Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News Update: Judge allows fakecel pedophile Nathan Larson to represent himself in federal child kidnapping, sex exploitation case

You think a 12 year old whore is a child? Cuck.
A 12 year old is just entering puberty so attraction to that would be a deviation from what’s considered normal. Also Nathan Larson had a shitload of cheesy pizza on his computer that he most certainly got off to sexually. If we are going to use words as they are defined, Nathan Larson was most definitely a pedophile.
 
Again, it depends on whether he was into prepubescent kids or not, as far as I know, he liked them as young as 12 which isn’t pedo by definition.
That's not going to matter :feelshaha:. Also majority of CP is with toddlers and pre-teens.
 
Last edited:
yea the law in most countries doesn’t differentiate between porn of teens filming themselves and getting the footage leaked, vs people filming themselves raping newnorn infants, they just group them all together under the guise of “child p0rn:soy:

didn’t know that, also how do you know?:feelshehe:

what? do u think a 12yo jb is a kid?
Yes. Are you sexually attracted to twelve yearold girls?
careful
 
He's not a "fakecel", I'm pretty sure that he was an Incel during both of his marriages. Sure he mogs most of us (simply for being White in many cases), but even the Pinay he got wouldn't touch him. Marriedcels are Incels too and we should welcome them. :blackpill:
 
It literally is you moron, a child by definition is PRE-pubescent, most 12 year old girls are pubescent and already have sexual urges and thoughts; therefore meaning they aren’t a child by all definitions. So thinking a 12 year old girl is a child, is indeed a deluded opinion.

Biologically an adult, in fact childhood only lasts a decade or so, biologically-speaking your teenage years are your first decade as an adult. Society changed how we view things, this is why child labour exists is less technologically developed groups.
 
View attachment 585064
Judge Thurston

Yesterday, on Friday, March 4th, 2022, U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston held a Faretta hearing and granted Nathan Larson's bid to go pro se (i.e. act as his own lawyer).

Background

Already covered extensively, but if you are new, here's a recap:

View attachment 585066
Nathan Larson

In December 2020, 40-year-old Larson (@Leucosticte) allegedly left his parents' home in Catlett, Virginia to pick up a 12-year-old girl in Fresno, California. They met on Larson's pro-pedophilia website, Rapey. Law enforcement intercepted both of them; Larson was arrested, charged, and indicted on five federal charges as a result.

If convicted on all counts, Larson would face a maximum of three life sentences plus fifty years' imprisonment.


Larson is the father of a young girl who he no longer has custody of. He has two ex-wives, one of whom was a tranny, and he unsuccessfully ran for the U.S. House of Representatives twice.

The hearing

View attachment 585067
Nathan Larson's ex-lawyer, Peter M. Jones

Yesterday's hearing comes after over a year's worth of pretrial motions and a mental evaluation of Larson, where he was found competent to assist in his own defense. As Larson is not vaccinated, objects to videoconferencing, and also objects to the federal courthouse's mask mandate, hearings were delayed multiple times.

Named after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Faretta v. California (1975), a Faretta hearing determines if a criminal defendant who wishes to represent themselves does so knowingly and intelligently. "Mr. Larson," Judge Thurston politely asked, "You are facing some very serious charges. Are you aware of that?"

Larson then started mumbling; Judge Thurston proceeded to read the Indictment to remind Larson of the potential penalties he would face if he was found guilty.

After Larson stated that he had no legal training or experience, Thurston patiently attempted to dissuade him from going pro se: "You would not receive any special treatment by the court. This is a valuable constitutional right to counsel that you are giving up...You would be going up against experienced criminal trial prosecutors, they would have experience in jury selection and court procedures that you don't."

Nathan's court-appointed counsel, Peter Jones, noted that he very strongly advised Larson against this, but accepted that it was Larson's right to represent himself, under the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian W. Enos, the federal prosecutor, raised concerns about the protective order, which prevents the parties in this case from sharing certain discovery materials (i.e. the evidence) with third parties. Since this case allegedly involves the kidnapping of a 12-year-old and a voluminous amount of child pornography, Enos noted that there would be logistical difficulties associated with Larson's pro se representation. The court would have to fulfil Larson's constitutional right to view and address the government's case against him ahead of trial, but also prevent Larson from disseminating or retaining any sensitive material. It is likely that the government will have to foot the costly bill for one or more third-party investigators to assist Larson in handling discovery materials.

In any case, Judge Thurston granted Larson's motion to represent himself. After several more minutes of wrangling over trial scheduling, she scheduled a status conference for early April to take place in the courtroom (instead of Zoom). Larson briefly argued with Thurston over the courthouse's mask mandate before the hearing concluded.

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Holy shit. I can't overstate how stupid (and rare) it actually is to represent yourself in a criminal case where you are facing life imprisonment. Like, it is plain suicidal. Against the feds? You will lose. Then again, Larson probably knows that he will never be released from prison, so I'm guessing he wants to use the trial to make some sort of political statement.

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Given the logistical difficulties of Larson's pro se representation, and because the Eastern District of California is one of the most backlogged federal district courts in the country, trial is not likely to start until early 2023.

@-BrettyBoy- @i_want_emo_gf @AwakenedArisen @Nebuchadnezzar @rope2cope @Transcended Trucel @watcher @FrothySolutions @Linesnap99 @LDARbeforeROPE @SparkLight @Arthas93 @solblue @ThisLifeKillsMe @ineedassistance @Restart80 @manlet cUnt @SchrodingersDick @Wizard32 @wgm24

Jesus PPEcel you are like, [UWSL]CNN + MSNBC+ FOX+NY Times (minus the cucked wokeness, of course) all roled into one. Are you really Tim Pool? [/UWSL]:feelsclown:

Anyway, yes I think you're right. The fact he wants to represent himself, to me, might reveal that he understands full and well that it's OVER for him in everyeay, so this trial he wants make into his Legacy. Every man wants to live on in some way or the other, and Larson may have thought he found his way to do just that. Though the constant and current preoccupations and masturbations of soyciety (toxic preoccupations) is impeding their actions and progress. Covid bullshit dictating the court's movements, terrible. I'm sure Larson may still find a way to make it into theater. If that was not his plan or he is unable to pull it off, then he's just plain dumb and he will burn. I don't know if there were any legal mistakes the police made or that Jones would have been able to find out during the course of prosecution, but now that he's been dismissed, we'll never know! Larson sure as hell won't be able to uncover prosecution mistakes on his own, so he's screwed himself.
 
Last edited:
Jesus PPEcel you are like, [UWSL]CNN + MSNBC+ FOX+NY Times (minus the cucked wokeness, of course) all roled into one. Are you really Tim Pool? [/UWSL]:feelsclown:

Anyway, yes I think you're right. The fact he wants to represent himself, to me, might reveal that he understands full and well that it's OVER for him in everyeay, so this trial he wants make into his Legacy. Every man wants to live on in some way or the other, and Larson may have thought he found his way to do just that. Though the constant and current preoccupations and masturbations of soyciety (toxic preoccupations) is impeding their actions and progress. Covid bullshit dictating the court's movements, terrible. I'm sure Larson may still find a way to make it into theater. If that was not his plan or he is unable to pull it off, then he's just plain dumb and he will burn. I don't know if there were any legal mistakes the police made or that Jones would have been able to find out during the course of prosecution, but now that he's been dismissed, we'll never know! Larson sure as hell won't be able to uncover prosecution mistakes on his own, so he's screwed himself.
Well, Jones got reappointed as Larson's lawyer, per my newest thread on the situation:

 
Well, Jones got reappointed as Larson's lawyer, per my newest thread on the situation:

Yes I saw that just now. Let's see what happens. Honestly, for being this openly stupid, he deserves to get into some jaip time. Of course this case will be debated on merits manufactured by Cucked Left and Cucked Right, alike.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top