"Philosophy of Mind" hmm.
I agree.
There is certainly a risk for children to develop abnormally when fed improperly, I feel like the risk is higher among vegan children because a lot of vegan parents are low IQ narcissists who do not understand nutrition. It is also true that being fed a omnivorous diet does not exclude poor development. I do not know the risk difference but I believe veganism has a higher risk of poorer development.
Animal protein is calorie dense and nutrient dense; but with calories held equal, I believe brain development is the same among meat eating and meat-abstaining children, although this situation may be unrealistic in lesser developed countries.
Most people agree with vegan ethics, even if they are not vegan themselves. The optimal diet for human health is mostly, if not exclusively plant based, so long as calories can be held equal. Many people believe veganism to be nutritionally inferior but experts agree that plant-based diets have better long term outcomes for health. Having enzymes to break down animal protein does not mean that animal proteins are better for our health, some animals who are clearly herbivores, like deer, can digest animal proteins.
I will make a thread and post my blood test results soon, and ask users to post theirs along with what they eat, in order to find out which diet is more healthy.
He's still funny, in this new video he told bobby he'll accept his challenge to a street fight to the death, then kill him.
Humor me and do it anyway. I might learn something.
Below is a common talking point for vegans and vegetarians
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Interesting.Below is a common talking point for vegans and vegetarians
Position of the American Dietetic Association: vegetarian diets - PubMed
It is the position of the American Dietetic Association that appropriately planned vegetarian diets, including total vegetarian or vegan diets, are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases. Well-planned vegetarian...
Seems like a lot of work. The issue is (mostly) been decided
I was comparing my blood results with other famous fitness youtubers, and I mogged all of their blood test results naturally. They are all heavy meat eaters as well.
I know, but it's still funny.
Damn, you lucked out. My parents forced me to eat a shitty Indian vegetarian diet until the age of 19. Even after I don't eat it that often, though I was eating it every day for a year or two. Nowadays I am barely consuming meat at all, like a few times a week or month. I assume this is a potential reason for the cognitive issues I had and my facial features and bone structure becoming progressively uglier during puberty. Also, might have led to low testosterone due puberty. I might have grown to 6 feet, had even bigger frame, deeper voice and become good looking if I had proper diet and would not be rotting here.
NOooo! This is not what really happened to you man, well at least not for the facial features or cognitive issues. The height, yes maybe was effected but NOT by much. It's already written as code in your genes. Do not misquote and re-interpreter my writings as whatever you want to it to mean as part of your mental breakdown session.
Dude, my cognition substantially improved after I started supplementing and even more so after eating meat in addition. I was suffering numerous symptoms of malnutrition constantly such as weakness, numbness and tingling of hands and feet, feeling out of breath, headaches, body aches and such.
Your face is the product of GENERATIONS of genetics. And no eating meat earlier wouldn't have changed that. But regardless...
I'm done helping you...You have no idea what's been said to you. I didn't say what you think I said. And you are unable to understand basic shit. Goodbye.
Yes, probably that my blood tests are better than youtube influencers who eat lots of meat.
Yeah..eating lots of anything is bad, so that makes sense.
I mean most of their diet is meat instead of plants.
True. I'll never not laugh at the fad of brainlets thinking they're Henry Clay. It's why I can't take that Destiny cuck seriously.
No, I mean the subject itself, not any specific philosophers."Philosophy of Mind" hmm.
You mean like David Chalmers ?
Dude whoa bro hey man dude it's been A LONG TIME !
Just curious..on which premise would you put humans above animals?
Can you elaborate the question a bit? Are you asking a question about Natural order?
Clarification:Dude whoa bro hey man dude it's been A LONG TIME !
Philosophy of Mind is mostly a bullshit field today don't ya think?. With bullshitters shaking their ass and bullshitting about all sorts of bullshit which they then bullshit into more goofy bullshit.
Outside of Daniel Dennet's conclusions what is there left to do except wag your tail like David Chalmers? I mean all the scientific disciplines like physics, biology, cognitive science, computer science or cybernetics need any further examination in relationship to mind and body but... honestly the "hard problem of consciousness" is really an area of non-practical bullshit workin the humanities fields. In a way it is designed to keep academics with no skill in life employed forever.
Actually, sounds like I good deal, I want in !
Yeah you implied animals and humans are not on the same level. I wanted to know what's the basis of this reasoning. Is it based on Intelligence?
It's based on the observstion that humans are the dominant mammals and no other mammal is. And yes, I suppose Intelligence level is the deciding factor for how we govern over other mammals. If this were not true, my dogs would take me out to exercise instead of me taking them.
Hey bro.
I don't think any field of philosophy is bullshit.
The work has no practical applications, but it has very important implications, especially in the emerging areas of AI and the discussion of sentience and machine consciousness.Outside of Daniel Dennet's conclusions what is there left to do except wag your tail like David Chalmers? I mean all the scientific disciplines like physics, biology, cognitive science, computer science or cybernetics need any further examination in relationship to mind and body but... honestly the "hard problem of consciousness" is really an area of non-practical bullshit workin the humanities fields. In a way it is designed to keep academics with no skill in life employed forever.
Actually, sounds like I good deal, I want in !
Why not? Of course it can be bullshit. Why would the field of Philosophy (today especially) be impervious to bullshit man? Does it have men and women in it? Yes. So it can be bullshit. I will explain more below.
Look, I'm not any sort Philosophy success or even a particularly scholarly fellow on all of the related points which I am about to make but...your wrong.
We are above foids and more intelligent, but that's not a reason to eat them.
Ughmm no. But..I mean, the gap between a chicken and a human is far greater than the gap between femoid and Man. I mean come on Rob. Let's be serious here.
Sorry typo: "law" should be "AI". My phone is mega retarded. You can add to that Machine learning bullshit and Robotics talk, when they try to say something like "soon we will all be cyborgs" blaa blaa. It's 25% real talk and 75% seduction.
To me that still doesn't mean I can eat them and treat them like objects.
Objects? But all mammals treat other mammals like objects. That's exactly what it means to "objectify women", treat them like objects!
Other animals rape and kill, and do a lot of other messed up things. The difference between them and us is we have more options when it comes to food, and we have the intelligence to make the most moral choices.
Robitical, this is a twisting of words people use. The word "rape" applies in our cultural terms as civilized humans (even though, many foids actually prefere to be practically taken forcefully during the sexual acts) but I don't think it should be used for animals, because it implies the animal might enjoy what's happening to them. It's certainly impossible to say they don't like it. Forced copulation isn't rape in the animal kingdom is part of the evolutionary process.
Yeah and I submit that it's not "more intelligent" to claim that being a vegan makes you more moral than one who is not. Yes we have choices, and choosing to eat certain animal products is not a moral failire.
Here I'll explain it another way. Your're right, as the dominant species we can make intelligent choices. And being that way means we can make allowances for certain animals based on their behavior, instead of just having "one rule fits all" ways of behavior that other mammals have towards themselves.
maybe malnutrition and all the chemicals in the vitamins they have to takes makes them crazy
Basically this is exactly what happens when adopting any extreme diet & drug ideological positions. And then they will say "but I am vegan and I'm healthy". Yeah, it's rare but it happens, and one will start noticing the problems over time. Mihaela Peterson's bullshit is the same. It's absurd. Bovine only lol.
When they are raped by a member of their own species it's fine for them, like when we lived in cave it was permissible to rape human foids if you were a human male. Being raped by a different species is a lot worse.
It is a moral failure to kill and eat them when you can be perfectly healthy, or even more healthy, by not eating them.
Maybe you can say that about some fish and insects, but chickens are so smart, I have four and they like to be carried around and petted. They are almost like walking parrots but without the ability to talk or fly. I used to have dogs and cats and like chickens the same as them. I can imagine cows are also intelligent, and we already know pigs are one of the smartest mammals, even more than dogs.
