Leftists go after wealth inequality but rarely sexual inequality. Funnily enough, sexual inequality is a lot worse. If Tinder was a country, it would have a higherGini Coefficient than 95% of country's on the planet, with the only ones surpassing it being failed shithole states where the population has gone totally bankrupt and starving so anyone who has a car now is in the top 0.001% (skewed results). Any functioning state has a Gini-Coefficient less than that of Tinder.
minhphan.substack.com
When it comes down to it, wealth inequality in the Western World is not even severe at all, you often hear phrases like "the top 1% of Americans have more wealth than the bottom 50% of Americans" as if there's a small group of wealthy aristocrats hoarding all the wealth. The truth is that the statistic reflects the ineptitude of the bottom 50% more than the greed of the 1%. Lets showcase my point with another example. Did you know that 40% of Americans have ZERO or NEGATIVE net worth? They have student debts, negative equity value, credit card debt, etc... that dwarf's their asset values. So, I could honestly say "I, Intellectual on Incels.is, have more wealth than the bottom 40% of Americans combined" and it would be a TRUE statement, but the statement could also be said about any highschooler with $5 to his name. Playing around with stats like that shows a meaningless picture of inequality.
If you took the aggregate networth of every billionaire in America and redistributed it to every American, it would come out to about $12,000 per American. Not totally insignificant, but a farcry away from the cause of the "declining middle class", as $12k is not lifechanging money to anyone ,and it it was, it is easily attainable, even with minimum wage.
The facts remain that we should focus our efforts exlucively on SEXUAL INEQUALITY, and ignore arguments from Marxists and other leftists who try to make it about income or wealth inequality.
Inequality on Tinder and more
How has the Internet created winner-take-all markets?
minhphan.substack.com
When it comes down to it, wealth inequality in the Western World is not even severe at all, you often hear phrases like "the top 1% of Americans have more wealth than the bottom 50% of Americans" as if there's a small group of wealthy aristocrats hoarding all the wealth. The truth is that the statistic reflects the ineptitude of the bottom 50% more than the greed of the 1%. Lets showcase my point with another example. Did you know that 40% of Americans have ZERO or NEGATIVE net worth? They have student debts, negative equity value, credit card debt, etc... that dwarf's their asset values. So, I could honestly say "I, Intellectual on Incels.is, have more wealth than the bottom 40% of Americans combined" and it would be a TRUE statement, but the statement could also be said about any highschooler with $5 to his name. Playing around with stats like that shows a meaningless picture of inequality.
If you took the aggregate networth of every billionaire in America and redistributed it to every American, it would come out to about $12,000 per American. Not totally insignificant, but a farcry away from the cause of the "declining middle class", as $12k is not lifechanging money to anyone ,and it it was, it is easily attainable, even with minimum wage.
The facts remain that we should focus our efforts exlucively on SEXUAL INEQUALITY, and ignore arguments from Marxists and other leftists who try to make it about income or wealth inequality.
