Serious What literature do you use to study math? Currycels GTFIH

[racoon4]

srs. Fucking limits are kicking my slavic ass What do you use to study for JEE?

 

[racoon4]

not a curry, but I use physical books.

name names, bhai. I need all of it

 

[Transcended Trucel]

use brilliant.org if u have money. otherwise Khan academy. Either way interactive courses > (((books)))

 

[racoon4]

Not a curry but use online resources tbh

like what? I really need to get good at derivations

 

[Transcended Trucel]

like what? I really need to get good at derivations

u need just spam the problems till they click. Also space out concepts. some concepts u will need revisit a second/third/fourth time to understand. you just have to accept it.

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

like what? I really need to get good at derivations

Try this:

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/33283/33283-pdf.pdf

 

[thespanishcel]

Fortunately the last time I studied math "math" was in the 1st year of my bachelor's degree. The rest has been applied math or statistics where exercises were more important than theory.

 

[Deadgeneration]

I'd rather smash my face against concrete than solve complicated math shit

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

I'd rather smash my face against concrete than solve complicated math shit

It is simpler than you imagine. I bought this book:

Off-Topic Logic Game

Unintelligent_Anon Join Date: 2016-02-24 Post Count: 361

#185501144Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:07 PM CDT Greetings, Off-Topic. On this particular occasion, I have decided to have an entertaining discussion with all of you by composing a simple game based on logical-reasoning. Firstly, while utilizing mathematics, we have objective statements such as "x = 5" Those particular type of statements are properly known as "predicates", given that they equate to either the Boolean values of true and/or false. within the above premise, it merely defines the quantity that variable 'x' represents. Therefore, it is "true" predicate. Although I used "x = 5", we could use symbolic notation such as this: E(x) = 5 Where uppercase "E" refers to the word "Equal", and the input variable 'x' receives the quantity described on the opposite side of the "=" operand. --------------------------------------- Recognizing the above objective explanation, the goal of the game is rather basic: to derive logical expressions to be interpreted by other users. I have devised a minimal list of logical symbols below: "-->" - The logical "if-then" operator. "If certain cookies are delicious, then some grapes are bluish"(Note that the premise predicate and the conclusion predicate do not necessarily need to be related. They merely need to have an obtainable Boolean value. '~' - The logical "NOT" operator. It merely negates "true"/"false" Boolean predicates into the opposite Boolean value. ~"I decided to traverse the area" becomes "I decided not to traverse the area." "^" - The logical AND operator. "(1+1 = 2) ^ (2 + 2 = 4) --> (5 + 5) == 10", which is true, given that "1 + 1 = 2 ^ 2 + 2 = 4" are both (true ^ true) respectively. Disregarding all of the other logical operators for the current moment, this is a sample expression that I have devised below: Suppose that we have variables 'a' and 'b': a = 100 b = 50 Firstly, let us define a predicate to determine whether the first value is a factor of the second value: R(a,b) = (a % b) This will retrieve the remainder of the division operation "a/b", using the difference between 'a' and 'b' as a referent. Likewise, R(b,a) would also retrieve the remainder of the division operation "b/a", using the difference between 'b' and 'a' as a referent. If I had an expression such as this: (R(a,b) = 0) ^ (R(b,a) = 0) It would be an expected case of a true/false pair. This is due to the mere fact that the (100 % 50) does not have a remainder, whereas (50/100) does indeed have a remainder of fifty itself. Hopefully the above descriptions provides a rather wholesome and otherwise precise discussion involving mathematical logic.

Re: math help!!!! !!! help!! ParadigmaticAnon Join Date: 2016-01-25 Post Count: 182 #183008674Thursday, February 04, 2016 5:55 PM CST Ah, here you go: http://math.stackexchange.com/ LaTeX formatting is also included.

 

[racoon4]

Try this:

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/33283/33283-pdf.pdf

thanks, brocel. seems like a decent book

 

[Sexless incel]

Not a curry but a calculator

 

[racoon4]

I'd rather smash my face against concrete than solve complicated math shit

I don't have a choice. I need to get into a stem college if I want to have a decent life + the only way to ascend is to get into college in a big city as there's the most toilets there so my odds are the best there

 

[racoon4]

Not a curry but a calculator

duh

 

[CountBleck]

try principles of mathematical analysis by rudin

 

[rhinestonecowboy]

I got rid of math in highschool. Getting a degree in hotel management now haha

 

[Pareg]

Various shit from the internet lol, tbh reading books was not my cup of tea
I would watch videos and try math by myself, like spending hours over stupid calculations
At the end it actually helped me I think

 

[Deleted member 42309]

name names, bhai. I need all of it

Book names? When i used to JEEmax i solved the entire 11th RD sharma objective and PYQs

 

[Deleted member 42309]

@trying to ascend

 

[Deleted member 42309]

RD Sharma Objective Volume 1:-
View: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0d-UkWYmTPhZkZBV0ppbjU5dmc/view?resourcekey=0-MJzbrvRoLbu0Q_oq6asSqg

RD Sharma Objective Volume 2:-

View: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0d-UkWYmTPhVzI1WFcwTDFQT1E/view?resourcekey=0-1p5KKJJ3su8hju9I55bd2Q

 

[ilieknothing]

Khan academy or YouTube videos

 

[satou]

Try this:

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/33283/33283-pdf.pdf

Going to try and brainmaxx and learn calculus after failing it in highschool due to me not paying any attention in class, thanks.