Which inequality is more brutal and eternal? Sexual or income?

AnonAutist

AnonAutist

bzzzzzt
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Posts
957
Online
29d 16h 47m
sexineq.png


Two interesting tweets I encountered today.

Is sexual inequality the most fundamental and important inequality in human history? More so than income, racial, gender etc etc? After all humans have had sex since the beginning of the species, owning assets, having formal claims to resources and enjoying things like 'income' are much more recent phenomena.

If so, are the Marxists and Socialists whose self proclaimed raison d'etre is to fight and oppose inequality, wrong and cowardly for not addressing this and only going after second order inequalities like income inequality?
 
Last edited:
Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Overlord
★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
5,207
Online
48d 9h 54m
Nobody shuts up about income inequality but no one talks about sex inequality

The gini coefficient of sex inequality is worse than the income gini coefficient of 95% of countries
 
metabuxx

metabuxx

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 21, 2019
Posts
9,198
Online
45d 20h 19m
Money is cope. Sexual inequality is the worst.
 
yeshuallah

yeshuallah

:panties:
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Posts
13,070
Online
97d 21h 5m
ded srs

thats why marxism-rodgerism(an amalgamation of Elliot Rodger’s and Karl Marx’s ideas) are becoming a thing.
 
Y

youthislife

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Mar 25, 2018
Posts
370
Online
8d 7h 51m
Nobody shuts up about income inequality but no one talks about sex inequality

The gini coefficient of sex inequality is worse than the income gini coefficient of 95% of countries
ded srs

thats why marxism-rodgerism(an amalgamation of Elliot Rodger’s and Karl Marx’s ideas) are becoming a thing.
 
AnonAutist

AnonAutist

bzzzzzt
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Posts
957
Online
29d 16h 47m
ded srs

thats why marxism-rodgerism(an amalgamation of Elliot Rodger’s and Karl Marx’s ideas) are becoming a thing.
But what would that even look like? Assigned partnerships in which an AI matches men and women based on looks, interests and temperament? And declare all types of intimate relations outside of these matchings illegal? Sort of like how the Soviets assigned people to jobs and careers?

Elliot Rodger's outlined vision (the manifesto part of his manifesto) was a global crusade on and intimacy itself under a totalitarian fascist-like regime, in which the female sex is removed from society, gradually starved to death in giant camps and a small pool of women is kept around segregated from men, and artificially inseminated to continue the species. Men could then continue to live free from the distractions and horrors of sex.
 
Johny.speiz

Johny.speiz

Incel revolution
★★★
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Posts
1,719
Online
7d 4h 10m
Both are bad when they are too much divergence/accumulation.

As Michel Houellebecq wrote in his book of 1994 wrongly translated in English as "Whatever", the original title is "Extension du domaine de la lutte", literally "Extension of the Domain of Struggle", referring to the Marxist class struggle, but not only, nothing but the truth.
First, come huge income inequalities gaps/wealth accumulation by a few Capitalists, then huge sexual inequalities/accumulation by a few chads. One can have one, but not the other, but if you have none, you know you're the real loser, that your place is not in this satanic earth.

You must also consider that Inceldom is a quite recent phenomenon, while income/wealth inequality is a thousand years old issue.
 
grondilu

grondilu

Mythic
★★
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Posts
4,649
Online
92d 22h 50m
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93tR96egox4


"We tried so hard to create a society that was equal,
where there'd be nothing to envy your neighbour.
But there's always something to envy.
A smile... a friendship.
Something you don't have and want to appropriate.
In this world, even a Soviet one, there will always be rich and poor.

Rich in gifts.
Poor in gifts.

Rich in love.
Poor in love."
 
Last edited:
yeshuallah

yeshuallah

:panties:
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Posts
13,070
Online
97d 21h 5m
But what would that even look like? Assigned partnerships in which an AI matches men and women based on looks, interests and temperament? And declare all types of intimate relations outside of these matchings illegal? Sort of like how the Soviets assigned people to jobs and careers?

Elliot Rodger's outlined vision (the manifesto part of his manifesto) was a global crusade on and intimacy itself under a totalitarian fascist-like regime, in which the female sex is removed from society, gradually starved to death in giant camps and a small pool of women is kept around segregated from men, and artificially inseminated to continue the species. Men could then continue to live free from the distractions and horrors of sex.
Blessed be the greatest mind of the early 21st century, the warrior intellectual Elliot Rodger.

After the great incel rebellion, which the oppressed sexless masses overthrow the sexhaving ruling classes, the nationalization and subsequent collectivization of the means of reproduction will usher a new era of sexual equality where all incels can have intercourse with a female whenever they want, in state-run brothels. Personal relationships are a NO since that means private ownership, which can lead to the degeneration of the incel communism.
Both are bad when they are too much divergence/accumulation.

As Michel Houellebecq wrote in his book of 1994 wrongly translated in English as "Whatever", the original title is "Extension du domaine de la lutte", literally "Extension of the Domain of Struggle", referring to the Marxist class struggle, but not only, nothing but the truth.
First, come huge income inequalities gaps/wealth accumulation by a few Capitalists, then huge sexual inequalities/accumulation by a few chads. One can have one, but not the other, but if you have none, you know you're the real loser, that your place is not in this satanic earth.

You must also consider that Inceldom is a quite recent phenomenon, while income/wealth inequality is a thousand years old issue.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_GzXcTkzNU

"We tried so hard to create a society that was equal,
where there'd be nothing to envy your neighbour.
But there's always something to envy.
A smile... a friendship.
Something you don't have and want to appropriate.
In this world, even a Soviet one, there will always be rich and poor.

Rich in gifts.
Poor in gifts.

Rich in love.
Poor in love."
Interesting how both replies complement each other
 
Last edited:
grondilu

grondilu

Mythic
★★
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Posts
4,649
Online
92d 22h 50m
As Michel Houellebecq wrote in his book of 1994 wrongly translated in English as "Whatever", the original title is "Extension du domaine de la lutte", literally "Extension of the Domain of Struggle", referring to the Marxist class struggle
I very much wonder what is the story behind this grossly different choice of title for the English translation.

"Extension of the domain of Struggle" is such a great title, it very well summarizes the main idea of the book, and it peaks curiosity much more than the stupid "whatever". Honestly "whatever" sounds like an almost derogative way to title a book. I wonder how Houellebecq could agree with that.
 
AnonAutist

AnonAutist

bzzzzzt
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Posts
957
Online
29d 16h 47m
Both are bad when they are too much divergence/accumulation.

As Michel Houellebecq wrote in his book of 1994 wrongly translated in English as "Whatever", the original title is "Extension du domaine de la lutte", literally "Extension of the Domain of Struggle", referring to the Marxist class strugle, but not only, nothing but the truth.
First, come huge income inequalities gaps/wealth accumulation by Capitalists, then huge sexual inequalities/accumulation to a few chads. One can have one, but not the other, but if you have none, you know you're the real loser, that your place is not in this satanic hearth.
Yes, St. Houellebecq is the original blackpill prophet. All hail Houellebecq.

sainthouellebecq.jpg
 
JosefMengelecel

JosefMengelecel

One who has nothing to lose has everything to take
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
Posts
2,508
Online
19d 12m
Sexual inequality is the worst of the worst. The income gap is kinda bad but the only people who actually care about it are communists
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Captain
★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
1,844
Online
7d 8h 43m
View attachment 306348

Two interesting tweets I encountered today.

Is sexual inequality the most fundamental and important inequality in human history? More so than income, racial, gender etc etc? After all humans have had sex since the beginning of the species, owning assets, having formal claims to resources and enjoying things like 'income' are much more recent phenomena.

If so, are the Marxists and Socialists whose self proclaimed raison d'etre is to fight and oppose inequality, wrong and cowardly for not addressing this and only going after second order inequalities like income inequality?
Do you have a source for the Zizek quote?
Sexual inequality is the worst of the worst. The income gap is kinda bad but the only people who actually care about it are communists
Nah, normal people will eat the rich and become more communist the wider the gap gets. (even tho communism is retarded).
 
Robtical

Robtical

Incel but not cuck
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Posts
24,231
Online
169d 43m
Rosties only care about the financial inequality, because they are more in control of the sexual market.
 
HyperVersager_4EVER

HyperVersager_4EVER

Mentally crippled by lonely coomer years
★★★
Joined
Nov 4, 2019
Posts
2,758
Online
32d 11h 41m
There is 0.001% chance that I might end up making good money some day
There is 0% chance that I will ever be attractive to any female
Both sucks but sexual is more brutal IMO
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. Counterintelligence
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
5,969
Online
65d 22h 53m
This thread is too high IQ to let it get buried.
 
A

AutisticMonstrosity

30 y.o. KHHV
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
473
Online
11d 17h 11m
View attachment 306348

Two interesting tweets I encountered today.

Is sexual inequality the most fundamental and important inequality in human history? More so than income, racial, gender etc etc? After all humans have had sex since the beginning of the species, owning assets, having formal claims to resources and enjoying things like 'income' are much more recent phenomena.

If so, are the Marxists and Socialists whose self proclaimed raison d'etre is to fight and oppose inequality, wrong and cowardly for not addressing this and only going after second order inequalities like income inequality?
I have tried to ask communists for years about why they always talk only about economy and never sexual communism and equality.

Marx was a good guy as far as I know and can be forgiven because in his time barely any men who had economic things in order was a long-time incel.

It would be very interesting to know what Marx would say about the current situation. I think he would be on our side.

Procreation and sex can nowadays be separated. (EDIT: I am long-time unashamed eugenist, and it can be done so that all can have sex, but all don't have the right to have their own biological children)

Society should be planned so that women have higher libido and the gender ratio at birth must be altered so that the unfortunate male surplus is turned to female surplus.
 
Last edited:
Billowel

Billowel

Ed junior
Joined
May 28, 2019
Posts
3,500
Online
47d 8h 3m
the marxist can only make sexual scarcity a non existent thing by abandoning technology and giving money to the incels so that they can betabuxx a whore.Will the marxists ever care about some semblance of equality?fuck no.that's why they will never do what i said above.Make no mistake,the marxists are not on our side.If you remove wealth and lack of technology then the only way we man can 'pay' to fuck a whore is by having looks.looks is currency baby.We man are fucked since only the cream of the crop gets any attention.
 
FinnCel

FinnCel

Alcoholcel
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 13, 2018
Posts
30,195
Online
102d 10h 28m
Nobody shuts up about income inequality but no one talks about sex inequality

The gini coefficient of sex inequality is worse than the income gini coefficient of 95% of countries
High IQ observation
 
NoCopeNoHope

NoCopeNoHope

Just Replace Them Already
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Posts
3,579
Online
63d 3h 14m
richorchad.jpg


Its obvious which one is worse. You can't buy the memories chad made when he was young. You can't buy Chad's genes for yourself. Marxism and other forms of socialism fail to understand why humans actually seek to acquire resources. They do it so their children can have the best possible outcome of reproduction. One of those things is getting access to the best females possible. Most human activity can be boiled down to this truth. Why do men buy expensive but otherwise useless status symbols? To attract foids. Why do they work unquestioningly for hours on end? Better future for children.

The only acceptable ideology that will permanently solve this issue is incel transhumanism. Our humanity is what holds us back. We must eliminate females and replace them with machines. Every male who is judged to be sound of mind will get the opportunity to have one child. Rodgers didn't go far enough in his solution.
As a side note, Marxists are by and large not interested in actual equality. Many completely ignore inequality in social and sexual capital, or see it as more just than income inequality. The communists simply want to have other males pay for their children.
 
Last edited:
Linesnap99

Linesnap99

Recruit
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Posts
440
Online
4d 1h 18m
without sex everything is a cope.
 
RoboticSubHuman

RoboticSubHuman

Subhuman monstrosity
★★
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Posts
167
Online
1d 15h 42m
Income inequality is worse. Being a slave to capitalist Chad is even worse than LDARing. Sexual inequality is so ingrained in female nature that it seems impossible to fix.


Blessed be the greatest mind of the early 21st century, the warrior intellectual Elliot Rodger.

After the great incel rebellion, which the oppressed sexless masses overthrow the sexhaving ruling classes, the nationalization and subsequent collectivization of the means of reproduction will usher a new era of sexual equality where all incels can have intercourse with a female whenever they want, in state-run brothels. Personal relationships are a NO since that means private ownership, which can lead to the degeneration of the incel communism.


Interesting how both replies complement each other
Respectfully, that is never going to happen. Everyone here getting a girlfriend as a betabucks is more likely than that.
 
yeshuallah

yeshuallah

:panties:
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Posts
13,070
Online
97d 21h 5m
Income inequality is worse. Being a slave to capitalist Chad is even worse than LDARing. Sexual inequality is so ingrained in female nature that it seems impossible to fix.



Respectfully, that is never going to happen. Everyone here getting a girlfriend as a betabucks is more likely than that.
Yeah I know it. It was just an elaborate larp for the lolz.
 
mNFwTJ3wz9

mNFwTJ3wz9

Mythic
★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Posts
4,880
Online
23d 15h 1m
Income inequality is worse. Being a slave to capitalist Chad is even worse than LDARing. Sexual inequality is so ingrained in female nature that it seems impossible to fix.
 
Johny.speiz

Johny.speiz

Incel revolution
★★★
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Posts
1,719
Online
7d 4h 10m
Marx was a good guy as far as I know and can be forgiven because in his time barely any men who had economic things in order was a long-time incel.

It would be very interesting to know what Marx would say about the current situation. I think he would be on our side.
It would be very interesting to know what he would say about the hundreds of millions which died in a very cruel way, it would be also interesting to ask him what he thinks about the other hundreds of millions that were tortured, were forced to labor in concentration camps or gulags in the most dreadful conditions, suffered forced famine, and the most of all cruelties mankind knew, for his ideology. The biggest genocides in such a short time, of all time. All for nothing, in the end.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
26,509
Online
51d 16h 38m
Sexual, definitely. No such thing as redistribution in that realm.
 
Solo Disident

Solo Disident

Recruit
★★
Joined
Jun 30, 2020
Posts
199
Online
1d 18h 38m
Sexual inequality is the worst of the worst. The income gap is kinda bad but the only people who actually care about it are communists
The thing I cannot stand about the communist is they rant and rant about the income inequalities but they never say anything about sexual inequalities. Not even if they have it in front of their eyes. I was with a group of comunists like 5 years ago and it was so pathetic. The foids there where hypergamic as fuck, I'am meaning like only going for supergigachads with big cars adn so on and the males never stated once that ovbious inequality there. Just so bluepilled loosers tbh...
 
JosefMengelecel

JosefMengelecel

One who has nothing to lose has everything to take
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
Posts
2,508
Online
19d 12m
The thing I cannot stand about the communist is they rant and rant about the income inequalities but they never say anything about sexual inequalities. Not even if they have it in front of their eyes. I was with a group of comunists like 5 years ago and it was so pathetic. The foids there where hypergamic as fuck, I'am meaning like only going for supergigachads with big cars adn so on and the males never stated once that ovbious inequality there. Just so bluepilled loosers tbh...
Communists are very hypocritical. They claim to want to solve the inequality between people of different incomes but support sexual inequality. I also hate communism in general just because of its leftist nature. Stalin was the only good leader of the Soviet Union. He prevented degeneracy from taking over the Soviet Union and was more nationalistic. Other than that communists are degenerate faggots
 
Robtical

Robtical

Incel but not cuck
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Posts
24,231
Online
169d 43m
Income inequality is worse. Being a slave to capitalist Chad is even worse than LDARing. Sexual inequality is so ingrained in female nature that it seems impossible to fix.
Rich guys aren't usually chads, they're ugly old guys. Foids not having access to men's tax money means the cost of pussy will be lower. I don't care if some rich old guys have more money than me if pussy is cheaper.
 
oldcel75

oldcel75

Captain
Joined
Jun 19, 2018
Posts
1,520
Online
5d 16h 41m
I am a good example of a person who came from poverty and now is doing good. If you are study hard and work hard you can get nice economic results. But there is absolutely no way for me to become a chad and to sexually attract foids. Yes, I may be able to betabux, but this is just long term escortceling.
 
AnonAutist

AnonAutist

bzzzzzt
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Posts
957
Online
29d 16h 47m
EeXHPQjWsAANyJX.jpeg


Speaking of eternal inequalities... is Chad and the essence of Chadness eternal? Is regression toward the mean a lie by social scientists?
 
A

AutisticMonstrosity

30 y.o. KHHV
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
473
Online
11d 17h 11m
It would be very interesting to know what he would say about the hundreds of millions which died in a very cruel way, it would be also interesting to ask him what he thinks about the other hundreds of millions that were tortured, were forced to labor in concentration camps or gulags in the most dreadful conditions, suffered forced famine, and the most of all cruelties mankind knew, for his ideology. The biggest genocides in such a short time, of all time. All for nothing, in the end.
I almost responded to this with "low IQ" but restrained myself. Now that what you have written in the other thread a moment ago, I really should have. And I already saw yesterday from your OP regarding NEETdollars that you were quite dense.

I can say that I have voted in every elections (not not voted in any election that I was eligible to vote) and that I have always voted for the most far-right candidate there has been. As much economic freedom as possible.

I still don't have a problem saying that "Marx was a good guy as far as I know".

Have you read Capital?
 
Johny.speiz

Johny.speiz

Incel revolution
★★★
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Posts
1,719
Online
7d 4h 10m
I almost responded to this with "low IQ" but restrained myself. Now that what you have written in the other thread a moment ago, I really should have. And I already saw yesterday from your OP regarding NEETdollars that you were quite dense.

I can say that I have voted in every elections (not not voted in any election that I was eligible to vote) and that I have always voted for the most far-right candidate there has been. As much economic freedom as possible.

I still don't have a problem saying that "Marx was a good guy as far as I know".

Have you read Capital?
Yes, quite a long time ago, and btw. it's incomplete, as Marx died before finishing it. Have you read it?
 
Top