From what I read the guy has messed with her before and was thrown out of the gym.
If he wouldve tried to say something normal im sure she wouldve continued to ignore him anyways.
Perhaps.
We'll never know.
But it would still be fine.
wasn't in this case was it?
The term 'acceptable' is subjective, I mean acceptable to me, regardless of whether this dude accepted it.
she also is. she had all the time of the world to tell him to fuck off.
He is the only one manufacturing the interaction.
This is blaming someone who is doing nothing at all to create an interaction, just doing some lifting.
well you said indefinite time, could be minutes long as well by your logic.
yeah I guess? I'm getting confused about this part of our conversation
realizing late that your silence won't get someone away in this context is, however.
People of average intelligence (ie higher than retards) can't be expected to have telepathic instincts into what sort of thing is most likely to get someone to fuck off.
Silence works well for a lot of people because it avoids the whole "she's playing hard to get, just flirting in banter" type of thing which can fuel some further PUA interactions.
Basically it's harder to misread a silent glare than it is to misread a verbal reply.
Not knowing someone's triggers and mannerisms, silence is a pretty good go-to for applying to various circumstances.
If you ever have to explain something which gets out of hand (ie the guy attacks her) you don't have to get asked "did you egg him on" or "did you reciprocate" because you can just honestly say "I said nothing" and not get trapped in cross-examination.
I think "emotional-romantic retards" was a poor choice of terms for me.
I intended this to mean "not having sexual experiences" which applies to us but not most foids.
But it might come across as "not being able to understate or evaluate" which of course is wrong, since despite our lack of experience I still think we might understand this shit better than foids with their serial relationships, because we can view them more objectively due to our separation and fixation on them
but not something related to an individual's intelligence
It might be in some ways: if you get chronically depressed from lax of sex and testosterone drops then IQ can drop because test boosts IQ.
I'm confident I'd be 20% smarter if I had a GF to coom w/ each week.
That said, despite our sometimes-lower IQ manifestation from test-drop from chronic-depression, i believe we apply our lesser intelligence to certain issues with more dedication than most normies would, which is why our end results is a better understanding despite a lack of talent: the pseudo-autistic fixation on analysis which normies don't bother with.
there's a chance of that happening but then they either leave or there's a small chance they'll double down, thing which will end in the moron getting in jail so unlikely to happen.
What state did this happen in? In a lot of dem-run places the prosecutors are getting lazy and tolerant and letting people off, especially ethnics.
I think we are not the only ones who know that male despair is growing: men are getting suicidal, reckless, and this would mean they wouldn't care so much about the potential punishment for attacking a woman who angers them.
In such an atmosphere it seems wise for a woman to be wary about a possible "double down" by giving an early "fuck off" instead of a prolonged silence.
avoiding making an scene to sacrifice your comfort is very low iq.
Would you do me the help of rephrasing (or elaborating upon) this point?
I'm not sure I completely understand your message here or the applications of your stance.
if he can't read her expressions then you'll tell him to fuck off. also, you have no other options, either cope and keep getting harrased or decide between declining politely or not.
Being bamboozled and hesitating for a minute is just too little of a delay for me to condemn.
It actually seemed like he was walking off in response too, so she might've thought it was working at that point before he doubled back and approached from her left side.
Also: do we know if this was being livestreamed? Maybe she was worried about seeming cruel by a premature "leave me alone".
Also: why does it seem like the start of the tape is missing? Like they cut some earlier scenes.
Maybe she actually did say something like "I'm busy" and that got cropped off where the film began?
i would be in shock too, but just for a very short period of time, like 3 seconds
That could depend on a lot of variables.
Say for example you were sleep-deprived, or you had a lot of other stuff on your mind.
it might even be possible you hear a guy talking but think he's talking to someone else and not you
Another possibility that just occurred to me...
...notice how her blonde hair is covering her ears?
What if she had ear buds in and was listening to music and that's why she didn't notice him until he came up close and shouted?
then i will react accordingly by saying ''not interested'' instead of staying silent for almost an entire minute.
but you're a big guy, despite her impressive curls she's still relatively a twig with a weak jawbone who is more prone to concussion from punches than we are
Womens only gyms would go out of business in a matter of months
This is silly, there are plenty of women-only gyms which have been going strong for years.
I know because I've been pissed off to fine some closer to me than intersex gyms.
because all the foids would have no men to squat infront of every day in attire so tight that one molecule less of fabric would shred it apart on the spot.
Ironic to mention this in a thread about a woman doing DB curls.
Also I haven't seen many women doing squats, it's too badass for them to bother with.
Even if they did: if you're squatting deep then the ass would get so low down it wouldn't exactly be 'in your face'. Stuff like good mornings or deadlifts keep the ass higher for viewing.
They go almost entirely for attention, but in a reverse form.
Explain what you mean by "reverse" form? Not understanding.
They enjoy men having to “behave” whilst performing erotic exercises in the vicinity.
Like... curls?
I've seen women doing lat pulldowns, it's not particularly erotic in any traditional sense except to ExRx fags like me who find ALL lifts erotic.
The women that wouldnt quit are either older foids trying to stay in shape or butches.
Or maybe just want to get fit enough to be able to fight off a rapist? *shrug*
Even though foids can't fully relate to our despair they still have "confidence" problems in relation to the confidence other foids experience, and could use fitness as an approach to try and improve that.
So true anything women do is for attention.
There's no need to exaggerate.
Women may more often than males do things with attention-seeking as a more predominant motive.
That's the more realistic way to put it.
The issue is how much more, and how do we actually measure what seems obvious?
IE how do we research to dispute reverse characterization that implies men do things for attention more often?
