Curries don't get bombed by a superpower but they are oppressed by their poverty and subhumanity. Sand nigs on the other hand are superior to curries but suffer from jewish western imperialism.
Southern Asian men, unfortunately.
@kay'
Curries hindus especially are genetically inferior to sand niggers, they dont even eat beef and are less aggressive and non intimdating compared to sandnigs. We all know who white stacies go to and which countries they travel to more
Sans nigs like people of the Levant and North Africans are more white looking than curries so they have it better.
Never expected such a braindead question like this from you.
You agree @kay' ?
No
Sand. Curries can trainrapemaxx. In Islamic countries the local elites hoard tons of women and you can't step outside of the line even in minor ways without risking severe punishment.
white women are turning moslem for BMC
Curries without a fucking doubt
Curries.
sands don't have it bad rofl
Curries for sure. At least sandnigs have superior physicality and can cope with their imperial history. Curries are the lowest of the low in every regard
Depends which, Levant Arabs like al-Assad are moggers, Assad himself even has blue eyes, Yemenis are all darker-skinned, then there are all the flavours of curry you can get, unless you mean in their home country. Since I'm neither I cannot comment on that
Obviously curries
Curries without a fucking doubt
You'd have to be on @Caesercel levels of cope to ever suggest curries are better in any way than sands
This idea is retarded so is the other option because the question itself is meaningless
Why is it meaningless? Ask anyone snd they'd sooner choose to be the average Arab as opposed to the average indian
That is not what the meaningless question is asking though
That's essentially what it is asking. It's asking who has it worse AKA who lives a better life, which we know is heavily influenced by looks?
No it isn't. The question "which race is better" is different from the question "which race would anyone rather be".
The first question is meaningless blabber. The second question is meaningful linguistically speaking but one for which no knowledge could be claimed
Curries
While curries may not be getting blown to smithereens they face the even crueler fate of living in india
While curries may not be getting blown to smithereens they face the even crueler fate of living in india
OK bro. Whatever copes your boat
There's also the fact that most arab countries sans Yemen, Palestine and Syria are decent. Morocco, Algeria, Iran, Turkey, and especially Saudi, Oman, and UAE. Even fucking iraq is safer and cleaner than India despite 3 decades of wars and american bullshit
Aren't both the same? Therefore the ones that live in the trash
Curries are made of shit
B
Curries, of course. How is this even a serious poll?
Saying "cope" to everything is not a valid response.
Obviously sands. Currys can run JBC game mang
Curries. Sands can run the muh Free Palestine game with SJWs.
Except that is exactly what you are doing
Curry's have lower SMV and are more mistreated by and hating by foids but curry's also have better living conditions in there home countries generally. It's close but I think I'm going to have to give it to curry's.
Kek no the fuck they don't. India is a shithole. Saudi, Oman, turkey, jordan, Iran, even fucking Iraq, have better living conditions that hindustan
You are the one who ascribed to me a postion on a question so meaningless that no coherent position on it could be held. And then you proceeded to make a statement tangential to that question. That too an assertion that may never be confirmed.
Yeah. I think its clearly you who are coping
is this even a question?
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
