Feminism is a range of socio-political movements and ideologies that aim to define and establish the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes.
This is the standard definition of Feminism presented to us by Wikipedia.
In every given group there is an apparent or disguised power dynamic behind the curtains, running the scripts and setting up the cast system of each set of existing groups. Divided by sheer power and ability.
For thousands of years, humanity's thirst for Power has been the driving motivating factor for progress in Human Society. And they have been able to achieve this only through violence and even more barbaric acts of violence.
Violence and the given resilience towards that violence is what determines the power dynamic of any given group/society.
However, to apply such logic to the power division between man and woman is not only foolish but insanity. For one to deny this, is to deny evolution. And it is indeed a great sign of foolishness to think that women have been oppressed throughout mankind's history.
The mere idea is an oxymoron. Women's very ability is to show resilience to violence by compensation. Compensation down to it's very core is a feminine action. It displays virtues such as a willingness to show submission in return of security.
Women throughout human history have traded dominance in order for stability and security. It is not so much that they are wholly physically incapable of achieving dominance over Men. It is the fact that for the feminine virtues such as honour, dignity and self-esteem are secondary.
They are secondary to Security.
Providing a woman with security is the ultimate indicator that you have control over her. Not only over her actions but also over her thought process.
One way in which this security can be presented to the female is through above average human height.
Evolutionary biology has led us towards this fact. Not a "preference" that someone may often mention. Not an individualistic, sort of character defining, personal aspect of somebody's person, but rather a sheer biological bias towards bigger men.
This is perhaps the biggest challenge that the Feminist faces in her ideology. It is conflicting enough to believe that you are dominant and then look for a dominant man to make you feel submissive to compensate for your lack of power.
But we shall not let it get twisted and mess up our understanding of this phenomena. The feminist, as a woman, is a woman indeed. Therefore, she follows a set of scripts, which has been passed down to her from millions of years of bias. Her reasons for dating a bigger man is also obtainable perceived security. Which manifests itself in the form of above average human height.
It is often baffling to see people in such cognitive dissonance. Their justifications and outright willful ignorance is a laughing stock to the community who's well aware of this phenomena.
As the old saying goes "Actions speak louder than words". One might often say they will change their lives, but still keep themselves in the same place, out of conformity. Out of adaptability and genetic biases that keep us trapped in such viscous cycles.
Thus you will see many feminists, who are independent, strong and fulfilled yet they still have the same "preferences" for height as non-feminist women do.
The assumption that security as an obtainable perceived attribute manifests itself in above average human height is not only justified, but almost always definitely proved by the group
that tries its best to deny it.
This is the standard definition of Feminism presented to us by Wikipedia.
In every given group there is an apparent or disguised power dynamic behind the curtains, running the scripts and setting up the cast system of each set of existing groups. Divided by sheer power and ability.
For thousands of years, humanity's thirst for Power has been the driving motivating factor for progress in Human Society. And they have been able to achieve this only through violence and even more barbaric acts of violence.
Violence and the given resilience towards that violence is what determines the power dynamic of any given group/society.
However, to apply such logic to the power division between man and woman is not only foolish but insanity. For one to deny this, is to deny evolution. And it is indeed a great sign of foolishness to think that women have been oppressed throughout mankind's history.
The mere idea is an oxymoron. Women's very ability is to show resilience to violence by compensation. Compensation down to it's very core is a feminine action. It displays virtues such as a willingness to show submission in return of security.
Women throughout human history have traded dominance in order for stability and security. It is not so much that they are wholly physically incapable of achieving dominance over Men. It is the fact that for the feminine virtues such as honour, dignity and self-esteem are secondary.
They are secondary to Security.
Providing a woman with security is the ultimate indicator that you have control over her. Not only over her actions but also over her thought process.
One way in which this security can be presented to the female is through above average human height.
Evolutionary biology has led us towards this fact. Not a "preference" that someone may often mention. Not an individualistic, sort of character defining, personal aspect of somebody's person, but rather a sheer biological bias towards bigger men.
This is perhaps the biggest challenge that the Feminist faces in her ideology. It is conflicting enough to believe that you are dominant and then look for a dominant man to make you feel submissive to compensate for your lack of power.
But we shall not let it get twisted and mess up our understanding of this phenomena. The feminist, as a woman, is a woman indeed. Therefore, she follows a set of scripts, which has been passed down to her from millions of years of bias. Her reasons for dating a bigger man is also obtainable perceived security. Which manifests itself in the form of above average human height.
It is often baffling to see people in such cognitive dissonance. Their justifications and outright willful ignorance is a laughing stock to the community who's well aware of this phenomena.
As the old saying goes "Actions speak louder than words". One might often say they will change their lives, but still keep themselves in the same place, out of conformity. Out of adaptability and genetic biases that keep us trapped in such viscous cycles.
Thus you will see many feminists, who are independent, strong and fulfilled yet they still have the same "preferences" for height as non-feminist women do.
The assumption that security as an obtainable perceived attribute manifests itself in above average human height is not only justified, but almost always definitely proved by the group
that tries its best to deny it.
