Because of the stereotypes. But are the stereotypes true? Surely race is only skin deep and cranial volume isn't actually higher among Rice Brothers and Noodlewhores right? The smart nerdy Asian is a harmful stereotype that needs to be eradicated, we have to portray Asians as absolute buffoons in the media, thanks to people like Brenda Song the new stereotype is that Asian toilets are dumb.
So, yeah, obviously I didn't mean the NEW stereotypes that Hollywood subversive morons try to promote. So are the OLD stereotypes of Asians true? Now, let's have a look...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016028960200137X
"A review of the world literature on brain size and IQ by Rushton [Rushton, J. P. (1995). Race, evolution, and behavior: a life history perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction] found that African-descended people (Blacks) average cranial capacities of 1267 cm3, European-descended people (Whites) 1347 cm3, and East Asian-descended people (East Asians) 1364 cm3. These brain size differences, containing millions of brain cells and hundreds of millions of synapses, were hypothesized to underlie the race differences on IQ tests, in which Blacks average an IQ of 85, Whites 100, and East Asians 106. The validity of the race differences in brain size, however, continues to be disputed. In the present study, the race differences in brain size are correlated with 37 musculoskeletal variables shown in standard evolutionary textbooks to change systematically with increments in brain size. The 37 variables include cranial traits (such as jaw size and shape, tooth size and shape, muscle attachment sites, and orbital bone indentations), and postcranial traits (such as pelvic width, thighbone curvature, and knee joint surface area). Across the three populations, the “ecological correlations” [Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger] between brain size and the 37 morphological traits averaged a remarkable r = .94; ρ = .94. If the races did not differ in brain size, these correlations could not have been found. It must be concluded that the race differences in average brain size are securely established. As such, brain size-related variables provide the most likely biological mediators of the race differences in intelligence."
So the stereotypes are 100% true, while the difference between Europeans and East Asians is minor, the difference between Sub-Saharan Africans and peelers is huge.
An Asian toilet can birth you better offspring.
I don't get how someone can read studies like the above and still want to reproduce with a Sheboon. That's why I'm an anti-afronatalist.
So, yeah, obviously I didn't mean the NEW stereotypes that Hollywood subversive morons try to promote. So are the OLD stereotypes of Asians true? Now, let's have a look...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016028960200137X
"A review of the world literature on brain size and IQ by Rushton [Rushton, J. P. (1995). Race, evolution, and behavior: a life history perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction] found that African-descended people (Blacks) average cranial capacities of 1267 cm3, European-descended people (Whites) 1347 cm3, and East Asian-descended people (East Asians) 1364 cm3. These brain size differences, containing millions of brain cells and hundreds of millions of synapses, were hypothesized to underlie the race differences on IQ tests, in which Blacks average an IQ of 85, Whites 100, and East Asians 106. The validity of the race differences in brain size, however, continues to be disputed. In the present study, the race differences in brain size are correlated with 37 musculoskeletal variables shown in standard evolutionary textbooks to change systematically with increments in brain size. The 37 variables include cranial traits (such as jaw size and shape, tooth size and shape, muscle attachment sites, and orbital bone indentations), and postcranial traits (such as pelvic width, thighbone curvature, and knee joint surface area). Across the three populations, the “ecological correlations” [Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger] between brain size and the 37 morphological traits averaged a remarkable r = .94; ρ = .94. If the races did not differ in brain size, these correlations could not have been found. It must be concluded that the race differences in average brain size are securely established. As such, brain size-related variables provide the most likely biological mediators of the race differences in intelligence."
So the stereotypes are 100% true, while the difference between Europeans and East Asians is minor, the difference between Sub-Saharan Africans and peelers is huge.
An Asian toilet can birth you better offspring.
I don't get how someone can read studies like the above and still want to reproduce with a Sheboon. That's why I'm an anti-afronatalist.
