ldarshortcel
Officer
★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2020
- Posts
- 779
Women should be pro incel breeding rights because half of their own offspring (i.e their own genes) could be incels.
By being chad-only, they threaten the continuation of their own genes. Especially with a birth rate of 1.4, many only have one kid (a son), so what they're doing is actually an extremely risky game. I thought they were risk averse? Too low IQ to realize this.
Of course, this will never ever happen, but from a purely evolutionary/biological view point, they should be.
Women always think it's our own fault that we're incels, but actually it's the fault of our parent's genes in equal parts, i.e. women are to blame to 50%.
Women think "my genes are flawless", when in fact they're average garbage. The only thing that saves their ass is the additional X chromosome, but this joker is gone with the next generation they raise.
Without the X they'd post with us alongside here.
By being chad-only, they threaten the continuation of their own genes. Especially with a birth rate of 1.4, many only have one kid (a son), so what they're doing is actually an extremely risky game. I thought they were risk averse? Too low IQ to realize this.
Of course, this will never ever happen, but from a purely evolutionary/biological view point, they should be.
Women always think it's our own fault that we're incels, but actually it's the fault of our parent's genes in equal parts, i.e. women are to blame to 50%.
Women think "my genes are flawless", when in fact they're average garbage. The only thing that saves their ass is the additional X chromosome, but this joker is gone with the next generation they raise.
Without the X they'd post with us alongside here.