wereq
Eugenics Lover Suffering From Unfixable Inequality
★★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2022
- Posts
- 23,757
Women are nothing more than fuck toys and breeding cattle. Women exist to improve the lives of men, not the other way around.
well We cant even have that so it is over for incel
tbhIndeed, but cucked retards fucked millennia of years of social engineering by giving them rights instead of just beating them harder
Yes, they aren't human
Indeed, but cucked retards fucked millennia of social engineering by giving them rights instead of just beating them harder
Tfw too late for screenshotWomen are nothing more than fuck toys and breeding cattle. Women exist to improve the lives of men, not the other way around.
Women must be enslaved again.Exactly.
The only purpose they have is to be bred and birth children... and they can't even do that.
Lots of foids these days refuse to have kids.
And the ones who do, have kids when their old, but they'll give birth to spastics.
Women should be slaves. Women exist to serve us.
Women are nothing more than fuck toys and breeding cattle. Women exist to improve the lives of men, not the other way around.
what a honestly pathetic trashcan self-serving GARBAGE hypocritical take, honestlyExactly.
The only purpose they have is to be bred and birth children... and they can't even do that.
Lots of foids these days refuse to have kids.
And the ones who do, have kids when their old, but they'll give birth to spastics.
So much You should be banned immediately!a female's purpose is not to serve your interests, nor should it be. they arent your FUCKING SLAVES you hypocritical retard. they choose their own purpose in life, just as you do
cope harder you illiterate retardSo much You should be banned immediately!
Everybody is self-serving you gigafaggot.this thread is a echo chamber of cowardly self-serving hypocrites
wrong. this is projection of the highest orderEverybody is self-serving you gigafaggot.
wrong. this is projection of the highest order
and even if everyone is self-serving, that doesnt mean we ought be self-serving
there is a divide between what is and what SHOULD be
SHOULD and OUGHT are a MORAL CLAIM. you made a MORAL claim in your op, which you entirely failed to justify, and just cowardly relied on a echo-chamber of other hypocrites to dickride you
Is–ought problem - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
the world shouldn't revolve around you and your needs at the expense of everyone else, because you are not the only being with moral status
by those standards, slavery and castrating nigger child slaves and beating them to death if they look at you funny is moral
Might makes right is based on master morality."might makes right" philosophy basically disregards the concept of moral status and basically morals altogether.
Its serious because as a bottom feeder, I understand the importance of wiping out subhumans given how our lives are agony. We are a hindrance and burden upon humanity.i just find it a bit funny how you embrace might-makes-right philosophy while simultaneously being on the bottom of the human hierarchy and probably the most subjugated group in our society, as a incels.is shitposter
@Master @Fat Link @The Enforcer @Dregster @SlayerSlayer @proudweeb @TheProphetMuscle ban this bluepilled soyboy right nowwhat a honestly pathetic trashcan self-serving GARBAGE hypocritical take, honestly
its stunning to hear people agree with such takes
a female's purpose is not to serve your interests, nor should it be. they arent your FUCKING SLAVES you hypocritical retard. they choose their own purpose in life, just as you do
your take would be the equivalent of a powerful politician saying "a average man's purpose is to be a female's slave, die in war, build society, and be nice cuckold husbands who raise chad's kids or get raped in jail"
you wouldnt accept other people choosing your purpose for you, and subjugating you because they are more powerful than you, and yet you advocate doing so to them, at your self-serving convenience. its stunningly hypocritical
i think you can make some arguments that women are bad people or act horrifically, but advocating for them to be slaves for your self-serving convenience, is just prime hypocrisy and a garbage take
the whole idea that its our purpose to have kids is outdated anyways because soon we will have genetically engineered children who wont be genetically related to any males. not to mention, we will have technology to prolong the lifespan for a long time, decades or even centuries, potentially ending biological death, thus in a way reducing or removing the need for children
Ban?@Master @Fat Link @The Enforcer @Dregster @SlayerSlayer @proudweeb @TheProphetMuscle ban this bluepilled soyboy right now
goodBan?
Ehh not yet.
50% warning however for blue pilled content? Yes!
@Master @Fat Link @The Enforcer @Dregster @SlayerSlayer @proudweeb @TheProphetMuscle ban this bluepilled soyboy right now
50% warning however for blue pilled content? Yes!
Good! If you continue to yap like the soy jewish autistic retard that you are, then we'll be forced to put you into a concentration camp.okay then! i suppose i wont speak up against slavery
Did you take the covid vax?wow!
i got a 50% ban warning level for arguing against slavery, because its blue pill, by fat link the moderator
okay then! i suppose i wont speak up against slavery
Do they really? If you look at human history, women were almost always subordinate to men. Thus women have always had to rely on men for their own economic and social security. It's one thing to be able to make your own choice, but it's another thing for your choices to be steered by evolutionary survival mechanismsa female's purpose is not to serve your interests, nor should it be. they arent your FUCKING SLAVES you hypocritical retard. they choose their own purpose in life, just as you do
It must be known this is not a matter of "choice", but rather a matter of "evolutionary survival". The optimal course of action isn't always necessarily the desirable course of action. The activities of natural world mostly revolve around power relations between predator and prey - The predator hunts, the prey stays clear of the predator. Humans are also noted to have power relations in their own artificial constructs (aka society) - The rich own the resources of production, the poor do not own the resources of production; the rich offer resources in return for labor, the poor work to fulfil the interests of the rich; the rich take most of the profit from economic production, the poor take least profit etc.you wouldnt accept other people choosing your purpose for you, and subjugating you because they are more powerful than you, and yet you advocate doing so to them, at your self-serving convenience
Now this is what I'm talking about! Sexy and hot girls are meant to be used for pleasure by men. I grew up watching Peter North use them over and over for his personal gratification and to make him blast his huge loads.Women are nothing more than fuck toys and breeding cattle. Women exist to improve the lives of men, not the other way around.
Of Chads you mean.Women exist to improve the lives of men
what a honestly pathetic trashcan self-serving GARBAGE hypocritical take, honestly
its stunning to hear people agree with such takes
a female's purpose is not to serve your interests, nor should it be. they arent your FUCKING SLAVES you hypocritical retard. they choose their own purpose in life, just as you do
your take would be the equivalent of a powerful politician saying "a average man's purpose is to be a female's slave, die in war, build society, and be nice cuckold husbands who raise chad's kids or get raped in jail"
you wouldnt accept other people choosing your purpose for you, and subjugating you because they are more powerful than you, and yet you advocate doing so to them, at your self-serving convenience. its stunningly hypocritical
i think you can make some arguments that women are bad people or act horrifically, but advocating for them to be slaves for your self-serving convenience, is just prime hypocrisy and a garbage take
the whole idea that its our purpose to have kids is outdated anyways because soon we will have genetically engineered children who wont be genetically related to any males. not to mention, we will have technology to prolong the lifespan for a long time, decades or even centuries, potentially ending biological death, thus in a way reducing or removing the need for children
Get the fuck out of our forum, ITwhat a honestly pathetic trashcan self-serving GARBAGE hypocritical take, honestly
its stunning to hear people agree with such takes
a female's purpose is not to serve your interests, nor should it be. they arent your FUCKING SLAVES you hypocritical retard. they choose their own purpose in life, just as you do
your take would be the equivalent of a powerful politician saying "a average man's purpose is to be a female's slave, die in war, build society, and be nice cuckold husbands who raise chad's kids or get raped in jail"
you wouldnt accept other people choosing your purpose for you, and subjugating you because they are more powerful than you, and yet you advocate doing so to them, at your self-serving convenience. its stunningly hypocritical
i think you can make some arguments that women are bad people or act horrifically, but advocating for them to be slaves for your self-serving convenience, is just prime hypocrisy and a garbage take
the whole idea that its our purpose to have kids is outdated anyways because soon we will have genetically engineered children who wont be genetically related to any males. not to mention, we will have technology to prolong the lifespan for a long time, decades or even centuries, potentially ending biological death, thus in a way reducing or removing the need for children
Yet it's the same philosophy that modern women use to rationalize their hypergamous behavior when someone tells them about the large excess of young, healthy men who are excluded from the sex / dating market as a result of hypergamous behavior in women"might makes right" philosophy basically disregards the concept of moral status and basically morals altogether
No, it is not. It's quite silly for you to even write this. In fact, the scientific method that has guided scientists and mathematicians in America & Europe for the past 400 years, is quite based on the philosophy of nihilismnot to mention, nihilism is a joke philosophy
It is impossible to prove or disprove that "objective morality" exists, because it involves the impossible task to prove that morality exists outside of the conscious individual. Thus moral realism can always be doubted from a reasonable standpoint. If "moral facts" can be proven to exist, a proof of "moral fact" would not prove to the conscious individual that "objective morality" exists, but a proof of "moral fact" may be applied to a universal context (e.g., the human consensus). Moreover the impossibility of proof that "moral facts exist as objective morals" doesn't prove that "moral facts" don't exist as "objective morals". The impossibility of proof only means it's not possible to prove that "moral facts" exist as "objective morals"theres quite a lot of powerful arguments for moral realism. some of the arguments for moral realism are quite new, developed in the last 25~ years, and are not reliant on god