Theory Autism is the future of mankind

[K9Otaku]

I've never seen any clear answer to why autistic genes remained in the gene pool, we probably have some small niche to fill, maybe having one of us in your tribe is useful to have someone speak out the uncomfortable truths no one else wants to say before your entire tribe let's mob mentally lead it into extinction,

Look at this:

Lawspeaker - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In the image below (taken from the article),

You see the local sperg recite the law to the whole Viking tribe. He is reciting, verbatim. That is his job.

And yet Viking society was one of the most Chad-centric ever. Even doing magic was considered gay for a man to do. Only female magicians were tolerated. You also have this guy:

What this shows is that even among the Vikings, some aspies were needed. But this barely scratch the surface. In every society, Law and Religion are the two sides of the same coin. That is why the Roman senate was both a legislative assembly and also the group of people who had the monopoly of priestly office (originally).

The mild autist is the one who repeats things. Repeating as in ritual (religion) and repeating as in "the law does not change on a whim". If this repetition disappears, the human group reverts to a hunting-gathering primate band.

As you've said so yourself, autists filled niches and got laid once in a while.

Spergs do not need to get laid to be useful. This is what the Western Medieval Church demonstrated.

 

[D.R.]

Some traits of autism like lower susceptibility to social pressure can definitely be good.

The researchers made the discovery after testing 31 children with autism spectrum conditions and 30 typically developing children who were matched for verbal mental age.
On each of five trials, each child was asked to watch carefully as a demonstrator showed how to retrieve a toy from a box or build a simple object. Importantly, each demonstration included two necessary actions (e.g. unclipping and removing the box lid) and one unnecessary action (e.g. tapping the top of the box twice).

The box was then reset behind a screen and handed to the child, who was instructed to “get or make the toy as fast as you can.” They were not specifically told to copy the behavior they’d just seen.

Investigators discovered almost all of the children successfully reached the goal of getting or making the toy, but typically developing children were much more likely to include the unnecessary step as they did so, a behavior known as overimitation.

https://psychcentral.com/autism/autistic-kids-tend-to-imitate-efficiently-not-socially

Dr Kristine Krug of the University of Oxford asked 155 children aged 6-14 to play a game where they were told they were learning to be spaceship pilots. They were then shown a turning cylinder with moving black-and-white dots and told these represented black holes. To navigate their spaceship around the holes, they needed to determine its direction of spin, which was made difficult by optical illusions.

The game was chosen because children have been found to be as good as adults at assessing optical illusions like this. During the game, an advisor – which for half the children was an adult and for the other half a child their age – told them which way the hole was turning. However, these advisors often got it wrong.

Among the 125 neurotypical children, an unusually clear age pattern emerged. Children under 12 exercised their own judgment, ignoring the advice they received, irrespective of the source. From 12 onwards, neurotypical children were strongly influenced by advice, be it from an adult or peer, even when they were told something contradicting what they could see. Wrong advice both slowed responses and led to incorrect decisions.

On the other hand, the autistic children, who had been matched for age and IQ with the neurotypical sample, were only very slightly influenced by advice, and this didn’t change as they aged. Once past age 12, they did better on the test than neurotypical participants because they were not swayed by the bad advice.

https://www.iflscience.com/children...-like-kids-without-disorder-study-finds-51343

However, I don't think that means autists are going to outnumber non-autists, evolution doesn't really ''care'' about any kind of higher intellectual goal, just replication, it would seem like being a mindless social norm copying machine is more conducive to reproductive success overall.

 

[Robespierre]

@Atavistic Autist thoughts?

 

[incelized ricecel]

Everybody but the people who have perfectly toned bodies (less than .1 % of the population) are scared of sex because they have body insecurities.

It’s easy to get toned/lean max t

 

[Aspergcel]

No it’s not

 

[Kselectedvirgin]

Think about this. Autists are people whose brain devotes less power than average to the decoding of emotions and therefore has more spare power for other things.

This appears clearly in Rain Man (1988). The character played by Dustin Hoffman is unable to process emotions and, as a result, is a so called "savant". He can count hundreds of matches on the floor in a single glance and perform other extreme feats of mental power.

Of course, the Rain Man situation is impractical. Someone like the character played by Dustin Hoffman cannot possibly function.

But what about people "on the spectrum", the spergs, the "high functioning autists"?

These people represent the future of humanity. They are the people who will solve new challenges because they have the mental resources to do so.

Of course, this requires a culture that is friendly to them, i.e. something that is exactly the opposite of what we have today. Our current culture values Chad/Stacy behavior, i.e. the basic mate selection process common to all mammals. In effect, our culture values the past (our most animal instincts) over the future.

As a result, our current culture will pass because it will self destruct. It is too much in opposition to the general thrust of human evolution.

What will replace it is up to us.

Science need a bit of autism to develop

 

[gummybearcel]

Nope, autism is not the future, not at all. Massive cope.
Autistic men are being snubbed out en masse. The breeding rates for autist men are in the gutter. Where in the past they could survive by maxxing out their knowledge and working as religious leaders/scholars and tacticians - now autists are drawn like flies to honey into some of the most degenerate niches. Due to their typically addictive personalities, most autist men are going to be addicted to porn and videogames whether they like it or not. This just means they can't focus their energy on actually productive pursuits.

Lower susceptibility to societal pressure used to have merit. Now, it's cool to be asocial whilst also being social. This means being a quirky trailblazer whilst also presenting as neurotypical - this is something autists often cannot do. Most cannot mask properly, especially men. This means that the 'autists' who are cool and quirky are often just normies trying to upsell their achievements by donning the autist label. IN AN AGE OF SOCIAL MEDIA, HOW YOU LOOK MATTERS MORE THAN ANYTHING. TO NEUROTYPICALS, AUTISTS LOOK 'OFF' AND 'CREEPY'. THIS IS ACCEPTABLE GROUNDS FOR DISCRIMINATION IN THEIR EYES.

Autistic men in particular are overwhelmingly unemployed, college dropouts, suicidal and self-loathing. Sound familiar? It should. I conducted a survey on this forum a while ago and according to the replies, 75% either had a diagnosis or thought they were autistic. Society is more hostile now to autistic men than it has ever been. Hypergamy hurts male autists more than anyone else, as it puts female instincts and opinions on a pedestal - which means that the universally-agreed-upon creepiness of autists are prime for discrimination (they are the opposite of dark triad, we all know how much women like bad boys). Incel hate is acceptable because most incels are autists. There are even certain physical traits associated with autism, which turn normie foids off.

 

[Nemesis]

I don't think so. Autists won't be a future, because they can't spreed they genes. It's a dead end