D
Deleted member
Guest
temporary, temporary, permanentwhat's up with all these random bans?
@Insalsa @notafed @FiveFourManlet
temporary, temporary, permanentwhat's up with all these random bans?
@Insalsa @notafed @FiveFourManlet
copetemporary, temporary, permanent
so he maxed out his warning level?permanent
yes.so he maxed out his warning level?
How exactly did we artificially inflate his warning level?He was def a fakecel being that he uses discord, but then the mods shouldnt just artificially inflate peopels warning levels, its not right
Pretty sure that's a low IQ way of saying you gave him a warning.How exactly did we artificially inflate his warning level?
How exactly did we artificially inflate his warning level?
And catfishman.Now dont get me wrong these larpers and fakecels deserve to be banned and I couldnt care less but at least be consistent and ban weed then
we discuss among each other before punishing "big time" users, we've always said so. he broke the rules, we saw it, we talked among ourselves and decided that he wasn't interested in reforming himself before deciding to send off a permanent ban for his infraction (30% on 70% equals 100%). how on Earth is this anything but acting responsibly?According to his ban message it sounds like you guys meet up in your secret comfy discord room and legit conspire like a group of star of david people on who you wanna ban next
"FiveFourManlet,
You have a received a 30% warning from knajjd for the post Roof collapses on normies at a party....:
Shut the fuck up you stupid dread hair-ed monkey nigger
Additional comments: mindless personal attack. all of the last three warnings are for targeted attacks. the mod team has decided to send off a permaban with this."
Another recent example is VST, despite carefully timing his warnings you guys just randomly decided to inflate his warning level and call it a perma
Now dont get me wrong these larpers and fakecels deserve to be banned and I couldnt care less but at least be consistent and ban weed then
It's the opposite - when someone is approaching the % necessary for a permanent ban and commits an infraction, and is on top of that a veteran member of the site, the mod team discusses the issue so that it is decided as impartially as possible. In other words, we check in with the group to make sure that we aren't being biased in our decisions individually. Say I have a grudge against 5'4'', for example; instead of just issuing the warning/ban myself, I would confer with the rest of the team first. Personally I try to avoid moderating users I particularly don't like, because I know that I might be biased.According to his ban message it sounds like you guys meet up in your secret comfy discord room and legit conspire like a group of star of david people on who you wanna ban next
"FiveFourManlet,
You have a received a 30% warning from knajjd for the post Roof collapses on normies at a party....:
Shut the fuck up you stupid dread hair-ed monkey nigger
Additional comments: mindless personal attack. all of the last three warnings are for targeted attacks. the mod team has decided to send off a permaban with this."
Another recent example is VST, despite carefully timing his warnings you guys just randomly decided to inflate his warning level and call it a perma
Now dont get me wrong these larpers and fakecels deserve to be banned and I couldnt care less but at least be consistent and ban weed then
Another recent example is VST, despite carefully timing his warnings you guys just randomly decided to inflate his warning level and call it a perma
How do i know if i get a warning?
^^^^ This , Those who break the rules must suffer the consequences5' 4" was a pure fakecel. Bon voyage.
Im a good boy"Carefully timed warnings" lol wut? We warned him when he broke rules. Same with everyone else.
And when it comes to VST, in hindsight, we were extremely lenient on him. Hell, this is the guy who blatantly bragged about grabbing a girls ass and how she called him afterwards....and he only got a 20 percent warning for it. So don't act like he's a good boy that the evil mods conspired to get rid of for no good reason.
VST was the one who was engaging in "careful timing". He would brag (or otherwise troll) until his warning level got high, then lay low for a month until the warnings expired then go back to bragging/trolling.
You will automatically get a PM from the mod that warned you that will tell you the post you were warned for and how severe the warning was. I just checked, and wow, you have quite a number of warnings....
specifically, zero.
@Total Imbecile - The real question here is why you haven't been banned for that annoying obnoxious chad avatar. If anybody on this site I would think was a larper all the while, doing slick indirect trolling, ITS YOU. Chad avatars are just a slick way for larpers to rub it in our faces under the guise of "le ironic avatar".
Not to mention you are a low effort poster
We can report stuff from weeks ago? I always thought after a couple days it would be tasteless to do so. I wonder what the maximum timeframe we can report is?Because its not against the rules? I just got warned btw and the mods had to dig up something from weeks ago because Im actually legit
Also Im a higher effort poster than most of the prominent posters here, Ritalin being the best example, 10k+ posts of pure gifs, memes and quoting others, at least I can produce a sentence that reflects my original opinion, that alone makes me higher effort than at least 50% of the users
We can report stuff from weeks ago? I always thought after a couple days it would be tasteless to do so. I wonder what the maximum timeframe we can report is?
JFL if you are not reporting things that you see from 2017We can report stuff from weeks ago? I always thought after a couple days it would be tasteless to do so. I wonder what the maximum timeframe we can report is?
We can report stuff from weeks ago? I always thought after a couple days it would be tasteless to do so. I wonder what the maximum timeframe we can report is?
This post was a special case. Won't go into details but rest assured that it was an exception to the common practice.I guess, technically there is no statute of limitations on your posts
@Total Imbecile - The real question here is why you haven't been banned for that annoying obnoxious chad avatar. If anybody on this site I would think was a larper all the while, doing slick indirect trolling, ITS YOU. Chad avatars are just a slick way for larpers to rub it in our faces under the guise of "le ironic avatar".
Not to mention you are a low effort poster
This post was a special case. Won't go into details but rest assured that it was an exception to the common practice.
Not really, but your sig on the other hand..Do you consider my avi to be Chad?
I think SOMCEL asked to be banned.why are @Solitarian_Walker and @SOMCEL banned?
Why the sarcasm? I don't see how by any logic you could derive that we go around looking for old posts to warn instead of focusing on current reports and posts following guidelines.
Didnt save but yeah I've seen him.Did anyone had photos of 5'4"?
why are @Solitarian_Walker and @SOMCEL banned?
Face >everythingDidnt save but yeah I've seen him.
Great face but a childs frsme and a turbo manlet
CopeeeeeeFace >everything
You can be 5' 4'' but if youre good looking it doesnt matter
You can be 5' 4'' but if youre good looking it doesnt matter
I think face matters above all else but height is a dealbreaker for a lot of women.Face >everything
You can be 5' 4'' but if youre good looking it doesnt matter
JFL if you actually believe this. Face can only save manlets if they have a 11/10 face. You have to be Chad tier in all other aspects as a manlet to even get a girl to look at you.Face >everything
You can be 5' 4'' but if youre good looking it doesnt matter
No, man.Is @chudur-budur perm?
noWow is this the first time @chudur-budur has been banned?
Yes, I don't know who the hell this "gambler" gut is (if I'm remembering correctly) but that shit isn't "ironically funny", a chad avatar is nothing but an annoyance, I literlaly just came home from my job, saw a chad and stacey feeling eachother up in the open, and then I have to log in here to see chad's smug face again, could you guys keep your fucking masochism to yourself and just make your computer screen saver chad, the rest of us don't want to see that shit.Do you consider my avi to be Chad?