MarquisDeSade
Mephistopheles
★★★★★
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
- Posts
- 15,859
I like the action scenesthat movie was one of the most soy things Ive ever seen in cinema.
I regret spending money on it, but in my defense I was invited by family members and didnt know what I was getting into.
Now I always look things up beforehand.
The remake was alright, but nothing ever beats an original, I don't care what they say.I like the action scenes
Never seen the original, but I know it wasn't as apocalyptic as fury roadThe remake was alright, but nothing ever beats an original, I don't care what they say.
like when the strong independent foid character that looks like a troon steals the spotlight of the man the movie is called after and beats the ass of comical portrayals of chauvinist men?I like the action scenes
mad max got soyed pretty hard.The remake was alright, but nothing ever beats an original, I don't care what they say.
Sure the main female looks like a lesbian but the director didn't intend to make it a soy female impowerment movielike when the strong independent foid character that looks like a troon steals the spotlight of the man the movie is called after and beats the ass of comical portrayals of chauvinist men?
Guess he utterly failed then LMAObut the director didn't intend to make it a soy female impowerment movie
Ok thenGuess he utterly failed then LMAO
I think over all men were portrayed as the villain and femfailos are the heros.In the movie, it clearly shows that men are disposable and have it much more worse than the female protagonists.
feminist propaganda is often incoherent and contradicts itself, bc the very ideology is disingenuous, factually wrong and degenerate.And if Joe was such a patriarch, why would he let a disabled woman lead his army? That seems pretty progressive of him
I think this is going nowhere@Waco
I try to repress my memories of ever wasting time watching that movie so I have a hard time engaging with specific points tbh.
Also its been a long time.
I think over all men were portrayed as the villain and femfailos are the heros.
feminist propaganda is often incoherent and contradicts itself, bc the very ideology is disingenuous, factually wrong and degenerate.
It could be that the filmmakers wanted to have a mean mean man as the villain doing mean man things bc men are bad, but at the same time their fragile egos are not able to commit to coherent worldbuilding, not seeing a disabled woman leading an army f.e. would send them into cardiac arrest, regardless of context. Feminist propaganda is either very superficial and bland or an incoherent mess bc its dumb and cancer.
Way more apocalyptic bruh.Never seen the original, but I know it wasn't as apocalyptic as fury road
Hmm.Ok then
In the movie, it clearly shows that men are disposable and have it much more worse than the female protagonists.
The sex slave foids live with immortan Joe who allows them to read preserved books, listen to music, eat high quality food and breathe clean air. They also waste a lot of water and don't know how rare it is in the desert world they live in.
Meanwhile the men live either as slaves who are forced to open huge citadel doors, work as mechanics and work in dangerous environments.
Almost all warboys have cancer and require blood transfusions to stay alive.
And if Joe was such a patriarch, why would he let a disabled woman lead his army? That seems pretty progressive of him
Ye my nigga. Joe built a different civilizationWay more apocalyptic bruh.