Post like the FBI is watching.
- May 6, 2018
- 103d 21h 50m
1. Their repetition ad nauseum prescribing us to do x,y and z is indicative of them telling us to earn it like its something that's guaranteed. Then they backtrack when it's inconvenient after their useless advice fails. That's what you're not taking into consideration. So if sex isn't something you can earn then what's the problem with us carrying on the way we are knowing that all our attempts meet in failure? In effect they want us to be slaves. Silent and docile.
"Repetition ad nauseum" is not a guarantee. And saying "I never said it was a guarantee" isn't backtracking, if that's what you're saying "backtracking" is. You MIGHT achieve sex if you improve yourself. MIGHT. No one said you definitely would. Just that you stand a better chance if you improve yourself, compared to lying down and rotting. And if you take your argument to Xpel Incels, he's gonna say the same. That I will guarantee. He's gonna say "I never guaranteed anything and I never backtracked."
2. These very same donors are likely to say Trans women are women. So that point is mute. They're actions in donating money based on the back of the woman saying she needs a vagina for sex is indicative of that. A woman is entitled to sex a man isn't by the looks of things.
4. See point 2. She wanted a vagina for sex. Others donated on that point. If they believe a man with a cock can be a woman or a castrated man be a woman then your point is mute about abnormality.
I think I'm explaining this wrong, so I'm gonna give you a question to focus on and answer.
Starving Guy wants a fish. He says he wants it because he thinks it tastes like vagina and he wants to taste vagina. He tells me this explicitly. Is it not possible for me to give him a fish NOT because I want to help him achieve his dream of tasting an approximation of vagina, but because he's starving and I believe he needs to eat some quality protein? Is it not possible for me to have my own reasons for giving him the fish, ignoring ENTIRELY his reasons for wanting the fish?
3. Nope. If a penis is too small then its non functioning for sex and reproduction. You're going to extremes.
I'm not going to extremes because "non-functioning" is an absolute. The "non" prefix stipulates it. It must not function at all. It must not achieve its goal. Even if the woman doesn't enjoy it, it the penis penetrates her and deposits semen into her, that's function.