Women pick partners only for their looks.
If they meet an aggressive and unstable guy and they decide to fuck him and have a relationship with him they deserve to be abused.
Every time i see in the news a hole that got beaten to death by their boyfriend/husband i get happy tbh
I won't embellish and say 'every' time.
Mandatory NAWALT white-knighting here, I'll cuckishly admit.
What you say is probably true more than 99% of the time though, I'll give you that.
There are rare exceptions where it would be hard to blame them, and I would resist doing so. Like for example:
1) a non-aggressive unstable guy suffers brain damage and changes
2) an aggressive unstable guy manages to be stable/sociopathic enough to hide his abusive tendencies initially until he's gotten her alone and vulnerable
The problem is that these rare exceptions get painted as the norm by feminist society so women can avoid accountability. To the point where the actual norm (women pursuing and tolerating unstable / aggressive guys) is basically ignored, which is fucked up.
I think a lot of us might actually witness this with our own mothers. Like for example, turning down gentlemen (who would make great stepdads for example) because there's "no chemistry" with them, while the guys she turns out to "have chemistry" with turn out to be drunks who constantly stomp around, slam doors, yell, play music loud, insult her kids, short her on bills, lie about being poor while buying expensive shit for themselves, etc.
Seeing foids tolerate this and put their fucking hamster-brain and pussy tingles about optimal child welfare can be very black-pilling. Gaining a healthy ability to hate women (no, that doesn't mean we hate all women, we just become more egalitarian and less inclined to pussy-pass or give benefit of doubt) compared to normies.
Normies who either had good moms (probably rare) or sheep minds (plentiful) lacked the ingredients for such a revelation.