MarquisDeSade
Mephistopheles
★★★★★
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
- Posts
- 15,859
Every once in awhile I like to see what's going on over there at IncelTear filled with beta orbiting feminist males on the prowl for pussy, homosexuals, lesbians, adolescent fifteen year old girls in high school, trannies, aging housewives, and lonely bitter old feminist shrews looking at their computers after feeding Mr. Bigglesworth Meow-Meow Mix. As I was turning the pages of that delightful cesspool over there something caught my eye and it was this book Female Choice that I just got an irresistible urge to criticize, mock, and deconstruct.
Let's explore this and some of the comments, we'll start with this below.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/lqor4b/evolutionary_biologist_many_men_will_no_longer/
Male patriarchy is nothing but a historical aberration they say and the new female matriarchy that will be global will save us all, they of course don't bother telling us how yet we're suppose to believe them at face value. You know, they talk about male sexual and social competition but notice they never speak about where that derives from. Of course it derives from females themselves and their sexual reproductive behavior that is capitalistic completely revolving around male social capital, the only way to lessen the severity of male sexual competition in the social atmosphere would be to make female reproductive sexual behavior less capitalistic itself, but you see, these cunts already know this as it is nothing more than just another female game, trick, and mental gymnastics a foot.
The elimination of monogamy, what a wonderful idea, so we'll go into a sexual sharing economy, is that right? Outstanding, the very wealthy top men at the pyramid of society can start by sexually sharing their wives, daughters, mothers, and female cousins with the bottom 80% of male incels worldwide where we'll all live happily ever after in one giant rapacious sexual orgy worldwide. P.S. I don't think the elites are going to like that with their global depopulation green energy initiatives.
Incels haven't always existed in large numbers throughout global history, this is nothing more than an empty historical revisionism. The reason why male incels are growing in population is because we've reached a pinnacle in history with complete concentration of money, technological specialization, and socio economic wealth at the top which now means a majority of men are barred out from the sexual marketplace where for many on a permanent basis. This kind of outstanding concentration of social or economic power at the top as it exists now did not take place in past history whatsoever as the magnitude that it does presently, of course this is the kind of rhetoric we can expect from a German female professor who probably grew up her entire life in a gated community of some type. Better to reduce men to aberrations than to challenge the current political status quo where your entire academic career is completely dependent upon that you don't.
Now, let's get back to a sexual socialized economy, as we all know in terms of economics everything revolves around supply and demand. Men outnumber women 5-2, so in other words, the demand for pussy outnumbers the supply of readily cunts available, but somehow the sexual socialized economy is going to figure out how to solve that riddle, right? Well, good luck!
Moving along, ah yes, the overall increase in male violence is inevitable. Yes, it actually is, it really fucking is.
You mean transforming the majority of men into existential neutered eunuchs without sexual relationships, children, spouses, or families forcing them to live like cyber digital Benedictine monks wasn't a recipe for greater societal stability? Wow, there's a real fucking news flash there, huh? Thank you captain fucking obvious.
You know there is that old saying, it goes something on the lines of, accept no substitutes, meaning, there is no substitutes for the real thing. And speaking of real calamities, the world will run out of natural resources to power technological industrial society long before artificial intelligence is even mastered, meaning, you can practically forget robotic girlfriends and wives as just another naive pie in the sky fantasy. Well, I'm certainly glad I've done this where I'll leave this first post here for now until I feel the need to add in more later.
Let's explore this and some of the comments, we'll start with this below.
In summary, she argues that patriarchy is an aberration in Earth's natural history and that a return to feminism will entail the elimination of monogamy (which unnaturally secures male sexual access, similar to how protectionism insulates certain economic sectors from international competition) and increased sexual competition between males where only a select few will enjoy the privilege of mating and reproduction. She goes on to say that "incels" (which according to her are those who wish to have sex but lack the necessary physical and mental characteristics to attract someone) have always existed in the animal kingdom and that the recent growth and exposure of the incel movement is an emergent phenomenon of a concrete societal shift away from male and toward female dominance. She says that unless society finds a way to satisfy the sexual urges of the majority of romantically hapless men, whether through virtual reality, sex robots or legalized prostitution, an increase in violence among those from their ranks is inevitable.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/lqor4b/evolutionary_biologist_many_men_will_no_longer/
Male patriarchy is nothing but a historical aberration they say and the new female matriarchy that will be global will save us all, they of course don't bother telling us how yet we're suppose to believe them at face value. You know, they talk about male sexual and social competition but notice they never speak about where that derives from. Of course it derives from females themselves and their sexual reproductive behavior that is capitalistic completely revolving around male social capital, the only way to lessen the severity of male sexual competition in the social atmosphere would be to make female reproductive sexual behavior less capitalistic itself, but you see, these cunts already know this as it is nothing more than just another female game, trick, and mental gymnastics a foot.
The elimination of monogamy, what a wonderful idea, so we'll go into a sexual sharing economy, is that right? Outstanding, the very wealthy top men at the pyramid of society can start by sexually sharing their wives, daughters, mothers, and female cousins with the bottom 80% of male incels worldwide where we'll all live happily ever after in one giant rapacious sexual orgy worldwide. P.S. I don't think the elites are going to like that with their global depopulation green energy initiatives.
Incels haven't always existed in large numbers throughout global history, this is nothing more than an empty historical revisionism. The reason why male incels are growing in population is because we've reached a pinnacle in history with complete concentration of money, technological specialization, and socio economic wealth at the top which now means a majority of men are barred out from the sexual marketplace where for many on a permanent basis. This kind of outstanding concentration of social or economic power at the top as it exists now did not take place in past history whatsoever as the magnitude that it does presently, of course this is the kind of rhetoric we can expect from a German female professor who probably grew up her entire life in a gated community of some type. Better to reduce men to aberrations than to challenge the current political status quo where your entire academic career is completely dependent upon that you don't.
Now, let's get back to a sexual socialized economy, as we all know in terms of economics everything revolves around supply and demand. Men outnumber women 5-2, so in other words, the demand for pussy outnumbers the supply of readily cunts available, but somehow the sexual socialized economy is going to figure out how to solve that riddle, right? Well, good luck!
Moving along, ah yes, the overall increase in male violence is inevitable. Yes, it actually is, it really fucking is.
You mean transforming the majority of men into existential neutered eunuchs without sexual relationships, children, spouses, or families forcing them to live like cyber digital Benedictine monks wasn't a recipe for greater societal stability? Wow, there's a real fucking news flash there, huh? Thank you captain fucking obvious.
You know there is that old saying, it goes something on the lines of, accept no substitutes, meaning, there is no substitutes for the real thing. And speaking of real calamities, the world will run out of natural resources to power technological industrial society long before artificial intelligence is even mastered, meaning, you can practically forget robotic girlfriends and wives as just another naive pie in the sky fantasy. Well, I'm certainly glad I've done this where I'll leave this first post here for now until I feel the need to add in more later.
Last edited: