I judge you based on the many absurd assertions you have made plus, yes your teenage girl picture for your avi.
Yeah I know, that's the problem. You aren't able to grasp these sort of concepts. But yet you call many others "low IQ and autistic"
But that's you also. You are very dense.
You are the one abusing it. Take your own advice.
finally some honesty.
finally some honestYes but, there are other ways.
So you are finally admitting it? And btw, there are many lesser evils and using a non-foid worship or non make worship avi garners insults from many of the users here. Like if I choose to put a dog, they call that "autistic and lame". Translation being , they WANT to signal their superiority by saying "we got pfp that represent hot women who we think might want to be with us one day". It's pure delusional bluepilled thinking and it bites.
I don't believe that will stay the case. There are many existing users and grays who want to talk about things and who are against having anime avis. But it will always be a reoccurring issue I think.
False. Displaying any kind of image isn't necessarily advertisement. If you draw attention to the picture, like creating a thread about it, then it becomes advertisement.
No, advertisement is advertisement. Praise is praise. Some advertisement is praise, and some praise is advertisement.
As already mentioned, display is not advertisement, nor is advertisement praise, nor is praise inherently religious, and so display is not praise, and thus, not worship.
This may not be intentional halomaxxing, but the halo avi is certainly real. We know that from @subhuman's experiment.
No, we don't know that it's deliberate. You're letting your biases cloud your reasoning. Not everyone who uses an avi is some kind of Machiavellian maximizer. In fact, most are benign.
You again didn't understand it, making it very obvious that you are the one who is unable to grasp concepts.
I'm not "abusing" anything. I couldn't care less what some internet losers think of me. The fact that you think people would intentionally 'abuse' anime avis to get more clout online on a broad scale just shows how out of touch with reality you are.
well, almost all the types of avis get shammed here unless you have an object avi or a not an avi at all like based meme or waco.
Not what I understand that verb to mean. If a father says "good job" to his son after he mows the lawn properly, the father praising him for a job well down, but is not engaged in religion.
But I was agreeing with you. What is wrong?
Public praise is religion. We have forgotten that because most religion today is stealthy, like foid worship. It is blatant and nonetheless people deny it is worship. It is disingenuous religion, yet it is religion.
An edgy protagonist is a hero. A hero is a god (a super-human entity). Of course you want to be super-human. This is the fundamental urge behind all worship.
Realest user on here and an actual friend. Unfortunately he got permabanned
Displaying an image as an AV is like having it on a T-shirt you are wearing. That is advertisement.
Have you already seen an advertisement that is not praise?
As soon as you do it publicly, it becomes religion. Praising someone publicly is hero-worship. That is why most people do not like it and they reply: "I was just doing my job", when you praise them publicly.
Indeed
The quotes I mentioned above show that an awful lot of people know it is deliberate.
What about halomaxxing? I.e. using foids as AVs to try and mogg your brocels?
Your AV is Chad-worship
Respect for this post...1. Displaying the image of a foid is advertisement. Examples:
View attachment 767515View attachment 767517View attachment 767518
2. Advertisement is praise; Praise is religion.
Advertisement is praise of the product (of course) but also of the person, or category of person, being displayed in the ad. Hence sponsorship.
The oldest sacred text of India is the "Rig Veda", which means: "the praise songs we memorize". The book of Psalms in the Bible is called "Tehillim" in Hebrew. This word is the plural of "Tehillah", which means: "a discourse (or song) of praise". In all religions it is the same. The fundamental religious act is praise. Also, the word "worship" has the same root as "worthy". In effect, "to worship" is "to make worthy", i.e. "to praise".
3. Displaying a foid image as one's AV is praise of that foid, hence worship.
And don't argue that "2D foids don't exist". Do you think that Ganesh exists? Or Zeus? Yet they are (were) worshiped.
But there is more (worse)
4. Displaying a foid as one's AV is halomaxxing, i.e. trying to crush-mogg fellow brocels
A few examples:
As the last image shows, not only niggers do that ...
5. Everyone knows that having a foid AV is deliberate halomaxxing
Halo, Halo, Halo, ... Mogg, Mogg, Mogg, ...
And then this (context: the recent poll on foid AVs. The question was, in essence: do you want to allow foid AVs again?):
I agree 100%. Foid worshipers do not only worship foids, they also use the halo to play petty aggression games on each other.
Foid worship is the weapon of the Ersatz-Chad just like irl Chad uses foids to crush-humiliate incels.
So basically 1on1 simping isn't simping?
No, you are not. You are probably like the German exchange students I have seen in the Bachelors programs here in Universities where I taught as a guest faculty. They were bright guys on paper and grades, but didn't understand shit about how anything works. In their own country or in India, or in America. You are probably like them except Incel so you are cynical, like many of us. Justifiably so. But I know more than you, way more. Same with K9OTAKU, light years more. So I recommend you STFU and listen.
It's what everyone thinks of you internet or otherwise. They abuse it online yes, but more importantly they are abusing their own mind. Raping themselves. That's what I am helping to prevent. Or at least I'm trying.
That's not what advertising means. Wearing a T-shirt with some logo or picture is not looking to persuade or influence everyone who looks at your T-shirt to buy the product or service (I mean, it would be advertisement, if you were getting paid to wear the shirt). It is, however, showing partiality or preference to it.
Yes. They're quite common.
Advertisement is simply drawing attention to something with the specific purpose of selling. When you're listening to music on the radio or watching a TV program you get interrupted by advertisements. These are intended to draw attention to a product or service to try and persuade you to purchase them. Some adverts are practically information dumps for the viewer, while others use psychological manipulation tactics.
Please, enough with this "everything is a religion" nonsense again.
Let me get make sure I get this right. You're claiming that anyone and everyone with an anime avi is deliberately trying to halomaxx to try and get clout and influence users here?
Simping is a consequence of religion, not (foid) religion itself.
Hair splitting.
Examples? Again, here you have to mention an advert that is neither praise nor blame (like anti-tobacco ads)
Which means praise. How can you sell if you don't praise?
To "persuade you", one needs to praise.
These are just a little more deceitful (or plain incompetent). The goal is always to get the viewer to get a favorable impression of the product, i.e. it is praise.
Stealthy praise is praise nonetheless.
No ad will ever be that bare. There will always be at least an image or a backdrop music that will make you feel good about the product. Praise again, even if implicit.
An ad like this would be incompetent in the extreme. No manufacturer or retailer will ever accept to pay for that kind of thing. The ad agency that pitches ads like yours to their customers will go out of business in a day.
"Some people do not have a religion" is normie thought, and so is "religion is stupid" (we are all "stupid" and hence have a religion)
Yes. They are using the power of foid worship for their personal advantage.
Of course. All the more reason not to bring foid worship here.
You're claiming that a random person walking around wearing a T-shirt with a logo is the same thing as a corporation paying to have an ad with the same logo during a television program.
Millions of things get sold everyday without somebody needing to praise the things being sold You ever bought groceries? JFL
Oh, right. Reason and logic don't work in your worldview. Everything is a religion, and trust trumps science.
Yes, that's the goal of commercial advertising. That isn't the goal of putting up an avi on an internet forum.
I'm very aware that you and that other guy, who you keep mentioning 24/7 like he's your spouse for some reason, both think you know it all, but everything you say is incoherent bullshit. This is what makes you highly unlikeable and highly unfit for a first world society where people only prosper when they offer actual value and not just empty words. Your friend is currently getting torn apart by me and based_meme here in this very thread and he still thinks he's right, you two are fucked up.
Seek help. You are imagining things that don't exist. Nobody is "raping himself" or "abusing their own mind". We are good, delusional old men. Help yourself instead, it's very needed.
bro just pay like 10 dollars for a whore in kenya
Memes. That answers everything, doesn't it? At least when you are too lazy to think, ....You're claiming that a random person walking around wearing a T-shirt with a logo is the same thing as a corporation paying to have an ad with the same logo during a television program.
OK.
Extract from the above Wikipedia article:Non-commercial advertising - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Anything under this category.
Grocery products get advertised all the time. And the packages you see on the shelves are yet another form of praise.
Science is trust. Dixit Thomas Kuhn. Scientific revolutions are shifts in trust. The old theory goes bankrupt and the new one becomes widely trusted. No theory is ever "proven", they just get trusted, and then later rejected.
I do not see the difference. When people try to get validation by being popular on a forum, they are in effect "selling" themselves. They are fishing for praise.
My reaction to this entire thread. Will the foid worship debate ever end?
It is the core of Inceldom. Why should it end?
I'm not saying it should necessarily end. I'm just surprised the fire is still raging. Most people eventually get tired of having effectively the same discussion ad nauseam, esp. after it's been a hot item for a while.
PS the core of inceldom has to be not getting romantic/sexual attention from females.
You read Chapter 4., right? It describes how foid worship started. It is impossible to understand inceldom if you do not get how it came about historically. Few people are willing to put in the effort and this is why the "debate" never ends. If people were less ignorant, it would be obvious and there would be no "debate"
That is the symptom, not the cause of the illness.
If everyone who disagrees is immediately ignorant, than tautologically yes, but that position seems disingenuous. People's wetwares are hardwired differently. Reasonable folks can disagree. Even on seemingly obvious topics. E.g., I like to think us both reasonable, yet we have plenty of disagreements.
I think I see what you mean, but the illness is foid worship, not inceldom, right? Inceldom is a symptom and it boils down to not getting romantic/sexual attention from femoids by definition.
That is not what I said. What I meant is that on this forum, 99.9% of people know zero about history and especially history of religion. It is a fact.
That is not the problem here. The problem is that we are talking about "foid worship" while people have never heard of Ishtar and have zero clues how religions evolved. As a result, explaining what the word "worship" means takes 90% of the "debate" and we cannot move forward.
The reason I think it is a good idea that you read this book is because when you will have done so, at least you will have an idea about the material I am arguing from. I am not saying that you should take the book as revealed truth. As you probably noticed, there are plenty of links to Wikipedia in the footnotes. Every time a subject is mentioned, it is an invitation for you to make your own research.
Yes. Foid worship is the illness. Like Chapter 4 shows, foid religion is a cultural parasite that has a great number of harmful consequences that vary depending on the time and circumstances. Inceldom is just one of them that manifests in our era.
I know. It was a hypothetical. I was just ruling out the possibility.
Being on the same page when it comes to definitions is indeed of paramount importance for fruitful discourse. As regards the word "worship", there isn't just one valid interpretation thereof. Your quote made it sound like that.
This is just an ad hominem attack (and one in rather poor taste too might I add). Why stoop so low?
Impeccable word choice
A word like "worship" cannot really be defined. When I talk about "what it means", what I have in mind is the history behind it, i.e. all the ways in which people have worshiped this or that over the centuries and millennia. Having a decent understanding of that history is the only way to make sense when you use the word.
Let us talk about that again when you have read a little more of the book, let us say after Chapter 6.
Not at all. Are you even following what that fuck face Nice Try says to us? Come on man, go look. He is the Commander in Chief of Ad Hominem on this website !
HeheImpeccable word choice
Good for youMy avatar is bird worship
