Cope Genetics are cope

[Man]

Genetics have always been cope.


Two long ancestral lineages with only attractive people can produce unattractive phenotypes, despite possessing genes associated with attractive features; this is colloquially known as genetic recombination.


Genetic "re"combination is simply genetic combination.


We are not clones, we have two parents with different genetics, and the expressed combination (A.K.A. Phenotype) of those genetics in offspring is neither consistent or predictable.


Therefore, claiming that inherited genetics are the cause of an individuals unattractive features is COPE; the true culprit is chance.

To deny this is to deny evolution.


TL;DR

Even Chad/Stacy tier genetics do not predict attractive children because genetic expression is not predictable.

I.E. you can be incel with chad genetics or chad with incel genetics.

 

[subsworkd]

Fax that’s why my dad is 5’7 and my mom is 5’4 I’m 6’3 with subs before 5’7

 

[CantEscapeYourFate]

Diet and environment during developmental years also plays a large part.

 

[turbo_coper]

Truth with modifications. It's about probability. Chads and stacies have a higher probabillity of producing a Chad than a sub 5 and a sub tier Becky.

 

[mogger]

Diet and environment during developmental years also plays a large part.

 

[turbo_coper]

Diet and environment during developmental years also plays a large part.

Biggest cope of them all

 

[subsworkd]

Biggest cope of them all

My cousin is 6’4 no one in his family is above 5’10 his dad is 5’7 mom 5’4 keep coping with muh genes

 

[I want to believe]

Nice cope.

 

[mogger]

As a Professor In Blackpillosophy I see your point, its mainly just ‘rare’ I would say most attractive parents do produce attractive children. I might have seen the other way around since many chad and Stacies might not have Chad tier parents.

But since when’s the last time you have seen Chad and Stacies produce incel tier children? Prolly not this month I would say.

 

[I want to believe]

Attractiveness is bones in most cases. You inherit those fucking bones. JFL. If your parents don't have good bones, you won't either.
But yes, if both of your parents are normies with good bones but bad proportions, you have a chance to be born as a chadlite.

 

[turbo_coper]

My cousin is 6’4 no one in his family is above 5’10 his dad is 5’7 mom 5’4 keep coping with muh genes

That's just an outlier though.

 

[Cope or die]

Truth with modifications. It's about probability. Chads and stacies have a higher probabillity of producing a Chad than a sub 5 and a sub tier Becky.

Theres probably no basis for that either. A pair of sub 5s probably have equal chances of making good looking babies as chad and stacy do making sub human goblins.

 

[turbo_coper]

Theres probably no basis for that either. A pair of sub 5s probably have equal chances of making good looking babies as chad and stacy do making sub human goblins.

There's no way of knowing for sure though

 

[turbosperg]

Therefore, claiming that inherited genetics are the cause of an individuals unattractive features is COPE; the true culprit is chance.

Is it pure chance that most abos are ugly and most swedes/dutch are not?

To deny this is to deny evolution.

To deny my question above is to deny population genetics.

TL;DR

Even Chad/Stacy tier genetics do not predict attractive children because genetic expression is not predictable.

I.E. you can be incel with chad genetics or chad with incel genetics.

Yes, you can. But what are the odds?

Ugly people breed ugly kids as a rule, and good-looking kids as an exception.

Likewise, good-looking people breed good-looking kids as a rule, and ugly kids as an exception.

In the end, whether you're born deformed and non-NT is down to luck, but some tickets to the genetic lottery are better than others.

 

[Man]

Attractiveness is bones in most cases. You inherit those fucking bones. JFL. If your parents don't have good bones, you won't either.

What better example of bone inheritance than height, all bones are affected. Many incels on here can attest to having siblings/family members who are far taller than them.

 

[Deleted member 45467]

Better looks better odds

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Fax that’s why my dad is 5’7 and my mom is 5’4 I’m 6’3 with subs before 5’7

My father is 5'10. I am 5'3. My paternal relatives are 5'11+ and have degrees.

 

[Man]

Is it pure chance that most abos are ugly and most swedes/dutch are not?

Is it not possible that in 1000 years the abos will no longer be unattractive?

If you think it's possible then you are agreeing with me.

Yes, you can. But what are the odds?

The odds are speculative. I couldn't tell you. My point is more leaning to chance being the final determination in phenotype.

Ugly people breed ugly kids as a rule, and good-looking kids as an exception. Likewise, good-looking people breed good-looking kids as a rule, and ugly kids as an exception.

You make it sound like you know the statistics; neither of us do, but my point remains that genetics are principally cope.

In the end, whether you're born deformed and non-NT is down to luck, but some tickets to the genetic lottery are better than others.

Relative chance is still chance.

 

[I want to believe]

What better example of bone inheritance than height, all bones are affected. Many incels on here can attest to having siblings/family members who are far taller than them.

JFL. Height and facial bones are different things.
But again, if your parents and grandparents aren't tall, you can't be tall either in most cases.

 

[turbosperg]

Is it not possible that in 1000 years the abos will no longer be unattractive?

If you think it's possible then you are agreeing with me.


The odds are speculative. I couldn't tell you. My point is more leaning to chance being the final determination in phenotype.


You make it sound like you know the statistics; neither of us do, but my point remains that genetics are principally cope.


Relative chance is still chance.

You're so smart, you should bet money with a friend on which couple will produce the better-looking kid:
a couple of average abos
or
a couple of average swedes.

Or bet on who will be the 100 most subscribed online foid celebrities in 2023... an abo, a curry, or a good-looking caucasian? Young caucasian foids are like 2% of the world population but more than 90% of the faces in porn, onlyfans, tiktok and other places where looks count. For males it's even worse. Do you think this is all luck? That tomorrow by any chance, people all over the world will simply prefer to look at sheboons, currywhores and abos?



Dude, you can play the powerball lotto and win. It is definitely POSSIBLE. But the odds are so overwhemingly against you that I don't even know what to say. Just do it, and see it for yourself.

 

[DryDick]

Cope. I wanna see the day two dumb rednecks produce an MIT magna cum laude

 

[Reclusemaxxer]

If genetics are cope then couldn’t I have been a 6’0 Chad instead of a subhuman

 

[Man]

You're so smart, you should bet money with a friend on which couple will produce the better-looking kid:
a couple of average abos
or
a couple of average swedes.

Dude, you can play the powerball lotto and win. It is definitely POSSIBLE. But the odds are so overwhemingly against you that I don't even know what to say. Just do it, and see it for yourself.

Do you honestly think I believe any two mongrels can produce a fucking white chad?

Two average abos can produce a chadbo and two average swedes can produce an incel.

Keep stretching for fringe cases while my point applies to 95% of the planet.

I am arguing for principle anyway, so you're missing the point man.

 

[Man]

Cope. I wanna see the day two dumb rednecks produce an MIT magna cum laude

Cope. I wanna see the day when two healthy people produce a child with down syndrome.

The inverse of what you just said is obviously stupid.

 

[CantEscapeYourFate]

Biggest cope of them all

What's the cope?
1. Believing that you played zero part in your inceldom because it's all controlled by genes, which completely removes your accountability for being an incel or
2. Knowing that you could have prevented your inceldom if you had a better diet and lifestyle during your developmental years, which makes you partially responsible for your inceldom.

You tell me what the bigger cope is.

 

[Man]

But again, if your parents and grandparents aren't tall, you can't be tall either in most cases.

Height has steadily increased over time, did those people not have shorter grandparents?

 

[RandomGuy]

What better example of bone inheritance than height, all bones are affected. Many incels on here can attest to having siblings/family members who are far taller than them.

 

[Izayacel]

Truth with modifications. It's about probability. Chads and stacies have a higher probabillity of producing a Chad than a sub 5 and a sub tier Becky.

 

[turbosperg]

Two average abos can produce a chadbo and two average swedes can produce an incel.

Yes, they can. Just like all the furniture in your room can spontaneously combust. Que question is: what are the odds ?

Bro, get this: mate choice is highly relevant in the outcome of breeding.

If it were not so, then all female animals would just pick males at random and we wouldn't have all these complex mating rituals.

Bro, when you imply that looks is all pure chance and has nothing to do with mate choice, you're so off reality that I don't even know where to begin. Maybe just go watch birds, or animal planet, or something.

 

[I want to believe]

Height has steadily increased over time, did those people not have shorter grandparents? 

You can have a 5'8 mother whose father is a 6'3 and a 5'9 father and end up being 6'2-6'4 tall, for example. "Short" parents, but tall son.
There are many combinations when children "magically" end up being taller than their parents.
Sexual selection can make us a bit taller or shorter gradually.

 

[Man]

Yes, they can. Just like all the furniture in your room can spontaneously combust. Que question is: what are the odds ?

Bro, get this: mate choice is highly relevant in the outcome of breeding.

If it were not so, then all female animals would just pick males at random and we wouldn't have all these complex mating rituals.

Bro, when you imply that looks is all pure chance and has nothing to do with mate choice, you're so off reality that I don't even know where to begin. Maybe just go watch birds, or animal planet, or something.

Your point has deviated too far from the meaning of my post and I don't understand the second half of your comment.

In almost every case, incels have the genetic potential to be average or attractive but because no specific phenotype is guaranteed, chance has played a part in their inceldom.

 

[turbo_coper]

What's the cope?
1. Believing that you played zero part in your inceldom because it's all controlled by genes, which completely removes your accountability for being an incel or
2. Knowing that you could have prevented your inceldom if you had a better diet and lifestyle during your developmental years, which makes you partially responsible for your inceldom.

You tell me what the bigger cope is.

Unironcally the second one. It implies that just about everyone has a chance in life, and that they get to reap the benefits of that only if they do xyz (i.e "muh diet and lifestyle"). That is massive cope, some people will have a shitty looking face no matter what they do in childhood and vice versa.

Removal of accountabiltity is a good thing btw. I don't think anyone here should feel guilty for being unattractive.

 

[Cope or die]

Gigantic cope. So there is equal chance a 5’1 and a 5’4 spawn a 6’7 mogger as a 6’4 7’2 couple spawning it. Two couples with non-existent jaws, small heads, low ipd, terrible skin and small cheekbones is likely not gonna spawn someone with these features.

Low iq. It applies less to height than bone structure or whatever the fuck. Yeah two people 6 feet something are mostly gonna have kids 6 feet tall or close. But two people with perfect jawlines probably won't have chad and stacy kids 100% of the time. Gtfo.

 

[Man]

Nice cope.

Am I coping? How

View attachment 658524View attachment 658523

yeah it was a bad example but it doesn’t mean my post is incorrect.

 

[Man]

Pure semantics. The unattractive genes you get through (re)combination are still your genes and still responsible for your unattractiveness.

You can have “attractive” genes but an unattractive phenotype, genetic expression isn’t 1:1 to your genome

 

[Lonelyus]

I just want a son but if i was able to produce one he wouldnt have a good life because he be ugly too

 

[Man]

But it's still your genes making you unattractive. Whether they are inherently unattractive or just manifest that way in a specific combination makes no practical difference.

Yeah maybe, i posted this last year and the point I was making had to do with people assuming their children will be ugly because they are, or assuming chad will have attractive children because of “genetics”

 

[Man]

I just want a son but if i was able to produce one he wouldnt have a good life because he be ugly too

How do you know he wouldn’t be attractive? Do you come from a long lineage of unattractive people?