Man
Ukraine is mine.
★
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
- Posts
- 4,566
Genetics have always been cope.
Two long ancestral lineages with only attractive people can produce unattractive phenotypes, despite possessing genes associated with attractive features; this is colloquially known as genetic recombination.
Genetic "re"combination is simply genetic combination.
We are not clones, we have two parents with different genetics, and the expressed combination (A.K.A. Phenotype) of those genetics in offspring is neither consistent or predictable.
Therefore, claiming that inherited genetics are the cause of an individuals unattractive features is COPE; the true culprit is chance.
To deny this is to deny evolution.
TL;DR
Even Chad/Stacy tier genetics do not predict attractive children because genetic expression is not predictable.
I.E. you can be incel with chad genetics or chad with incel genetics.
Two long ancestral lineages with only attractive people can produce unattractive phenotypes, despite possessing genes associated with attractive features; this is colloquially known as genetic recombination.
Genetic "re"combination is simply genetic combination.
We are not clones, we have two parents with different genetics, and the expressed combination (A.K.A. Phenotype) of those genetics in offspring is neither consistent or predictable.
Therefore, claiming that inherited genetics are the cause of an individuals unattractive features is COPE; the true culprit is chance.
To deny this is to deny evolution.
TL;DR
Even Chad/Stacy tier genetics do not predict attractive children because genetic expression is not predictable.
I.E. you can be incel with chad genetics or chad with incel genetics.