How feminists can claim men have had it better historically is a joke: men have traditionally been canon fodder, have had really hard, shit jobs...

ItsACrazyWorld

ItsACrazyWorld

Recruit
-
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Posts
30
Online
22h 27m
...have been sent away from their family, etc. For example, the other day, I was watching a documentary on the Great Wall of China. Effectively every man in the army was drafted to build it. How many hours per day they worked, I have no idea, though you can imagine it's gonna be at least 12. The fucked-up thing though? These men were forced to stay there, work, no days off and were 1000s of miles from their families. Many soldiers had wives & kids (I guess people died by mid 30s then...so even a 20 year old soldier, would often have a couple of kids, probably), who they were forcefully separated from for an indefinite period of time. Allegedly the thing took 200 years to build - imagine that: you live in the south, are taken by the army, moved 1000s of miles North, working 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, until you die, never seeing your family again. And women want to argue that they have had it hard?

In reality, it did get better, since apparently when the general saw the moral of the men dropping, he allowed the wives and kids to move from their hometowns to where the wall was being constructed, effectively building villages along the route to accommodate the workers.

Likewise, look at human history - it's been nothing but fighting the entire time. Men would be sent out into the battlefield, outnumbered, knowing full well they were about to be slaughtered. They were literally worthless...nothing more than canon fodder...

In contrast, I wonder how women would react if they were conscripted and about to be sent into battle, sent over the top of the trenches, knowing they would be gunned down by the enemy? Would they want this form of equality?
 
Genetic Dead End

Genetic Dead End

Veteran
-
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
Posts
1,292
Online
28d 3h 34m
If ugly men didn't exist, feminists wouldn't have anything to whine about. They will gladly accept being cat called and "molested" by Chads.
 
Wagiecel

Wagiecel

Former Wagecuck. Now NEET master race...for now
-
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Posts
3,663
Online
54d 13h 7m
It's simple. In the eyes of foids, sub8 men don't exist. They're like background objects.

In the eyes of foids, only the Chad Qin Shi Huang and his generals exist. All those nameless solders are just objects not men.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
-
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
23,454
Online
28d 11h 55m
Only Chads, despots and millionaires are considered men in that context. Those are the ones they're comparing the average woman to, not average men.
 
TINMAN

TINMAN

Failure
-
Joined
Nov 7, 2018
Posts
4,740
Online
58d 16h 33m
It's apex theory, sub8 men and men with no status are invisible.
 
Speed

Speed

Veteran
-
Joined
Feb 12, 2019
Posts
1,331
Online
40d 9h 30m
Kings, Chiefs, Warlords, Chad's, and Presidents having a good time = All Men having a blast.
 
radishman

radishman

Captain
-
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Posts
1,724
Online
23d 17h 39m
It all makes sense when you realize they mean chad. The guys that own the world. The guys that never have to commit due to endless demand. When they say men they do not mean male population.

Oddly enough also the only men they want.
 
ThoughtfulCel

ThoughtfulCel

G.O.R.I.L.L.A _M.A.X.I.N.G
-
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
4,642
Online
57d 21h 50m
Any question that has anything to do with feminists or women In general only has one answer.

Women are adult children who dont have the same cognitive ability that males do.

That's it. Theres no secret hidden reason as to why women think the way they do.

images (2).jpeg
 
AlexanderTheGreat11

AlexanderTheGreat11

youngcel
-
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Posts
20,215
Online
105d 9h 2m
Just doing all the dirty work
 
Top