"At least I'm not dumb" is a cope.
Higher IQ = more moneymaxxing prospects = more brainpower to ascend and to seek out foids = more intellect to think of copes
IQ = success is cope. Having "success" is more about the right life circumstances, environment and cuckoldry to follow the Life Script to a T and do all of the normie shit. It's not "high IQ" to be successful -- it's more about compliance, order, upbringing, connections/"luck" and beyond.
If you have a high IQ but are blackpilled you can technically intelligence mog many in higher life positions than you, including doctors and shit sometimes even, but that won't matter -- they "won" technically in a sense while you still "lost" regardless of brain potential or power.
Most who have "high IQs" actually have NORMALIZED IQs relative to their field of work (if they even do) -- so it's a chicken or egg 101 issue: are you smart because you became a doctor, or is a doctor "accustomed" to use their fluency/capabilities in said "field" or "specialized area" a certain way? Obviously if everyone follows a mold/code of conduct/"set of rules" you're bound to see similarities in said "brain power" because that's the whole purpose of it, i.e., to teach you A PARTICULAR RANGE OF THINGS that would then grant you your "IQ level" or "score."
Many praise or look at IQ in isolation as if it's any good, but when you look CLOSELY you see a trend among IQ and fields suggesting it's not that "high IQ" people lead to the "high IQ" fields but that each literal "field" encompasses the same requisites to "fit" said area of function. If it takes two twigs to build a cross of wood, wouldn't everyone who "knows" how to build a cross of wood have the same "IQ" or some other measurable brain function then? It's the same shit with docturds, legal cucks, etc. -- just different "rules" or "code of conducts" & shit in the end.
Many people don't become doctors because they are "dumb" but because they are DIFFERENT. I know many of you want to cope & say it's not this way, but almost every field has an average IQ because IQ is about SOLIDIFYING A USE of some measurable "intelligence" IN A PARTICULAR REACH, AREA OR FIELD rather than being some broad, generalized tool to determine inherent means/ability. Almost all of those "successful" who also happen to have "muh high IQ" are just circumstances of luck -- every "smart" person isn't successful & the simple fact of a higher number on a piece of paper by itself never gave anyone success without the myriad of other things necessary you can figure, i.e., luck/blackpill, connections, looks, upbringing, family "success" prior/money growing up or wealth, etc. "High IQ" bragging's very dumb when you really pick it apart.
