Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Incel-science: Mind blowing theory on female desire

C

CentipedeCel

Banned
-
Joined
Aug 20, 2023
Posts
70
If you think about natural selection; women actually desire 2 things. Only 2 things really 'reward' a woman's genes genetically be accelerating how quickly they are passed around and distributed:

1) Is the mate capable of providing/protecting/healthy
2) Is the mate desired by other women.


That's it. The second one is a surprising outcome, and is the reason for everything why looks even matter. Women actually have no idea what IS and ISN'T attractive. They are simply going off what other women tell them is attractive. And this makes perfect sense evolutionarily.

From a female perspective; You can have a daughter or a son. In terms of 'distributing your genes'.. a daughter is useless; At best shel'l have 2-3 kids. A son however has the chance to be become a gene-dispensary, and pass your genes on to tens even hundreds of grandkids. So we'll only consider what happens with male offspring and female offspring is non-significant in terms of genetic dispersal.

Well, what qualities do you want your male offspring to have, those are the qualities your going to search in your mate. Well, there's the obvious ones; physically healthy etc.. but the most obvious one is this: HE is liked well sexually by other women.

IF you mate with a guy that is liked well by other women; and your male child inherits that genetic 'trait'... then as a woman you have the golden ticket and your genes are now likely to be massively distributed. Thus the 'preference' for liking guys that are liked by other women ITSELF will get massively distributed; and that IS what's happened. That's it. That's the 'apex' of female desire. Height; Race; Face... all of this shit is just symptomic preference.

The only TRUE genetically re-inforced preference is women are attracted to men, that other women are attracted to. This explains a shitload. This explains why Marylin Manson has a whole bunch of wet teen girls chasing him despite looking like a homosexual facially deformed walking corpse. It explains the insane attraction to 'celebrity' men, as they simply see other women having sex with and enjoying that guy.
 
Last edited:
1) Is the mate capable of providing/protecting/healthy
Thats why manlets and facels are rejected, they have very low chance of getting hired or employed
2) Is the mate desired by other women
This is social validation that acts as a safety net. people dont want to take risk in decision making. For instance if majority people like a product then the individual is confiremed that the product is good.
 
This is social validation that acts as a safety net. people dont want to take risk in decision making. For instance if majority people like a product then the individual is confiremed that the product is good.

That's what I thought at first, but it's much deeper than that.

Women are not picking guys other women like because he has good reviews or something. Instead; the women that picked guys that other women liked... had chad son's that other women liked (just like their dad) and thus ended up giving her hundreds of grandkids.

Whereas the women that DIDN'T have this genetic preference. They just chose tall handsome guys, but didn't select SPECIFICALLY for men that other women like... THEY got sons that may be tall and handsome.. but other women DIDN'T like their sons; so they got a LOT less offspring, and their genes died out.

Pretty soon ALL surviving women specifically and on a genetic level like men that other women like. It's genetically hard-wired into them; like the instinctual fear of falling off a cliff. It's not a matter of trying to find a product that others like; It's pretty profound.

Now you mjight say tall and handsome; of course other women will like that; But my theory here is that those are actually SECONDARY characteristics; They aren't innate preferences. For instance if we had generations of humans raised in a giant warehouse with a rotating sawblade at 6ft height, and the closer to that height you got; the more chance you die...

EVEN IF all women started off prefering 6ft guys; those women's mate's and their son's will DIE due to the saw blade, and all that will be left is women who for whatever freaky reason love midgets; and to those midgets born in that world it will be a hard-fact: Women love short guys. Cos the ones that love tall guys went extinct.

(A similar thing MUST have happened to women who love short guys in this universe; Those short-guy loving women; had male kids; the male kids were probably physically killed by their taller peers, and thus the genes for preferring short guys... went extinct and we're left in a world where every woman is like 6'ft+ please... because the women with that preference.... they are the only ones who's son's survived to give her hundreds of grandkids).
 
Last edited:
1) Is the mate capable of providing/protecting/healthy
2) Is the mate desired by other women.


That's it. The second one is a surprising outcome, and is the reason for everything why looks even matter.
:yes:

That’s why even if someone were to give a manlet a chance, the pressure of their other foid friends judging her for it would eventually disallow and deter them. All women care about deep down is social status and looks. To be heavily reliant on them is to function on a human level. It’s in their survival instincts and there really is not much else to their character, if there is one.
 
I mean you're right but this is not a new ''mind blowing theory''. This has already been established.

On the bright side of things, this post alone proves you're higher IQ than 95% of your fellow graycels. Good job :feelsYall:
 
The only TRUE genetically re-inforced preference is women are attracted to men, that other women are attracted to

This is circular reasoning. If every single woman needed to know if other women were attracted to a certain male in order to feel attraction, they wouldn't be attracted to anyone since they all needed the external validation. It's an infinite loop.

I'm not denying that women care about the perception other women have of men (because they do), but it's obvious that there are universal traits that are considered to be attractive.
 

Similar threads

Logic55
Replies
9
Views
403
cripplecel
cripplecel
I
Replies
6
Views
343
Tacomonkey
Tacomonkey
TheJoker
Replies
5
Views
178
TheJoker
TheJoker

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top