FakeFakecel
PhD in Agony & Anguish
★★
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2023
- Posts
- 5,128
You really think a malnourished uneducated African is gonna score higher than a 70 IQ? Use common sense. Africans from Nigeria and Sierra Leone have higher average IQs than African Americans. What will 15-20% white DNA even do for IQ even if it WAS beneficial (which is a lie). 1-5 points maximum?This graph is for the USA though. How do you explain the data from Sub-Saharan African countries? They barely have ANY water in some places, let alone leaded water.
In fact, if I remember right results from Africa are even lover than the results of African-Americans. Maybe it's the 15-20% white DNA helping boost Afro-Americans?
Use common sense
You don't have to believe that part, but the bottom line is lead has been shown to decrease IQ, and American blacks mysteriously have disproportionately higher lead in their bodies other races. There are of course other factors that affect IQ, which are related to poverty:View attachment 1020903
Bro, you're the one saying that the government is secretly putting lead to black people's water
Find a local clinical psychologist and ask them if they administer IQ tests. Then ask them how to prepare for one.still something you train your mind to do. Of course you cant go above your natural IQ but if say a persons max IQ is 100 but given the test unprepared they only score 80 is thus inaccuraze because those scores are then used on research papers and articles. Like example rich normies are actually tutored on how to take tests whilst poorcels are not. Possibly some slum dwelling cel actually has an IQ similar to the rich normie.
like a small child. First crying about me saying we have god in us now reporting threads.Also,
Inceldom:
[]Discussed.
[]Not discussed.
basically genetically the same
Nigger, it's laughably ironic that you're claiming IQ tests are unreliable, while being unable to navigate the forum UI properly and placing your thread where it belongs.like a small child. First crying about me saying we have god in us now reporting threads.
i wish i could ban u for good from seeing any of my threads because u behave like a toddler
Why would I ask them anything like that? I will just ask which test they offer and research online how to prepare for it.Find a local clinical psychologist and ask them if they administer IQ tests. Then ask them how to prepare for one.
Oh just shut it mannnn. I want to discuss and I like the term "inceldom discussion" . Like it or hate I like the term so I post here and here comes this big baby crying and running to report to the daycare staff that I took his crayon. ShieeeeeetNigger, it's laughably ironic that you're claiming IQ tests are unreliable, while being unable to navigate the forum UI properly and placing your thread where it belongs.
Don't be so self-absorbed that you think every time I comment in one of your threads it's personal. It's not. Pull your head out of your dumb ass. You've been smelling your own shit for too long.
It unnecessarily clutters the forum, retard. It's why we have different sections instead of one giant forum with spam trannies flooding everything.Oh just shut it mannnn. I want to discuss and I like the term "inceldom discussion" . Like it or hate I like the term so I post here and here comes this big baby crying and running to report to the daycare staff that I took his crayon. Shieeeeeet
The point I was trying to get across was that IQ tests are designed so that the only preparation you can do is to have a good night's sleep. They're not domain-specific, which is the point, so that you don't need training to do them, since that would defeat the purpose. All you need is to be able to understand the language of the test.Why would I ask them anything like that? I will just ask which test they offer and research online how to prepare for it.
By the way I have no need for an IQ test, I am satisfied with my IQ. I always do well on anything I really find interest in or any exam I really want to pass, so I dont care about IQ because I have enough for what I like doing.
Google which tests physcologists use and you will see people actually prepare for them. Thats why I said they are inaccurate when researchers qoute them in studies and research papers. Obviously they serve a purpose such as the tests the US military use to place people in roles that best suit them. But the way studies qoute the results is unfair. Example private school kids actually get tutored on what to expect and how to navigate the test whereas public school kids are just thrown in the deep end. Like seriously some fool like George Bush is way lower IQ than many people on this forum but he would probably score better than a random person from this forum who would rather play video games than prepare for the test.The point I was trying to get across was that IQ tests are designed so that the only preparation you can do is to have a good night's sleep. They're not domain-specific, which is the point, so that you don't need training to do them, since that would defeat the purpose. All you need is to be able to understand the language of the test.
I don't know if there are any studies that show if there non-negligible differences in IQ scores due to previous IQ test exposure, but it would be interesting.
I didn't know South Asian meant Indian countries. I thought they were referring to South-east Asia.
Show your sources for this. The chart showed that the amount of lead in blacks were rapidly rising. What reason do you have to believe it's on the decline other than your need to validify your white supremacist agenda.And the whole lead thing? Look at it man, the closer you get to today the less lead blacks have. It's almost equal to the whites now. Yet their intelligence is still the same old crap.
Prepare for what purpose exactly? Getting a high score or actually improving your true cognitive horsepower? I'm telling you that the usefulness and effectiveness of doing this is effectively nill for the purpose of actually boosting your IQ, as far as we know, and changes for the purposes of just upping the score is negligible.Google which tests physcologists use and you will see people actually prepare for them.
Show your sources for this.
Bro please read your own graph It shows it's declining for all races.The chart showed that the amount of lead in blacks were rapidly rising.
Brutal nigger IQ pill.Bro please read your own graph It shows it's declining for all races.
It seems @CantEscapeYourFate couldn't escape his fate.Brutal nigger IQ pill.
If you read my numerous replies on this thread you will see that I agree with your statement that ones IQ will never increase beyond their natural threshold regardless of how much one prepares for the test. If a person is born with an IQ of 80 then thats their limit end of story.Prepare for what purpose exactly? Getting a high score or actually improving your true cognitive horsepower? I'm telling you that the usefulness and effectiveness of doing this is effectively nill for the purpose of actually boosting your IQ, as far as we know, and changes for the purposes of just upping the score is negligible.
Look up Robert Haier and his work. Shit, you can even email and ask him yourself.
Your argument was this:My argument is that in many instantances their true IQ will not be reflected in their results due to poor preparation whilst for other participants their true IQ will be reflected in the results, thats all I am saying and I say this specifically for published "research papers" on which I am claiming are in many regards misleading. Do you understand me now? I never ever argued against the fact that a person can exceed their natural IQ
And I'm trying to explain to you those supposed inaccurate reflections in IQ studies due to people "studying" for them are not inaccurate at all in fact, because the tests are designed to account for what you incorrectly believe is a confounding variable.Google which tests physcologists use and you will see people actually prepare for them. Thats why I said they are inaccurate when researchers qoute them in studies and research papers.
Dude I have never taken any IQ test but one thing I do is that I can understand a topic really well and score average on the exam if I do not at least do some exam preparation. If I prepare then my exam results are much better.Your argument was this:
And I'm trying to explain to you those supposed inaccurate reflections in IQ studies due to people "studying" for them are not inaccurate at all in fact, because the tests are designed to account for what you incorrectly believe is a confounding variable.
But,Dude I have never taken any IQ test but-
If you haven't taken one, then you don't know your IQ and therefore there's nothing to be satisfied with. Simple as. End of that story.By the way I have no need for an IQ test, I am satisfied with my IQ.
IQ tests don't work like that, but if you genuinely don't care about your score that's perfectly fine. It's probably psychologically healthier overall anyway, even if it might be coping against the fear of possibly scoring lower than your ego and self-esteem would allow.I always do well on anything I really find interest in or any exam I really want to pass, so I dont care about IQ because I have enough for what I like doing.
An IQ test is not a school exam. The only things that they share in common is that they're both timed, written, and proctored.one thing I do is that I can understand a topic really well and score average on the exam if I do not at least do some exam preparation. If I prepare then my exam results are much better.
No, it can't. You seem to be incapable of understanding this, buddy boyo.Now same logic can be applied to IQ test.
I'm not doing either. JFLBut I now digress because I feel you are just cherry picking certain replies and qouting them out of context. If you do that you will numerous replies that contradict each other but in actuality what you are doing is ignoring the context in which that reply was qouted.
But anyway I believe that if anybody takes an IQ test without preparing for it will score just as an unfit athlete will have a slower sprint. Believe what you want because I believe a person better prepared fairs better when the end result is revealed. So thats why I do not agree with you at all and plus you just saying stuff instead of bringing evidence to back it up
Too brutal, tbh. KEKIt seems @CantEscapeYourFate couldn't escape his fate.
Dude do you think I am going to read through a whole book or paper that you qouted ? Post the relevant paragraphs here, thats how its done everywhere in the real world.But,
If you haven't taken one, then you don't know your IQ. Simple as. End of that story.
IQ tests don't work like that, but if you genuinely don't care about your score that's perfectly fine. It's probably psychologically healthier overall anyway, even if it might be coping against the fear of possibly scoring lower than your ego and self-esteem would allow.
An IQ test is not a school exam. The only things that they share in common is that they're both timed, written, and proctored.
No, it can't. You seem to be incapable of understanding this, buddy boyo.
I'm not doing either. JFL
My brother in humanity, I literally GAVE YOU THE NAME of one of the world's top IQ researchers several posts above for you to look into.
I'm not going to spoonfeed you AND move your jaw to crush the food for you. Holy fuck.
If you can't be arsed to read the point-by-point replies to your own shit, then you might be leaking brain tissue. JFLDude do you think I am going to read through a whole book or paper that you qouted ?
You're at the summit. The funny and sad thing is that you can't realize it.
Abstract
THE few studies1,2 in which the effects of inbreeding on cognitive performance have been examined revealed that offspring of first-cousin marriages had lower IQ scores than offspring of unrelated parents. These studies were, however, performed in societies where the population engaging in such marriages is a small (1%, 6%)2,3 and unrepresentative proportion of the total population. Possible confounding of the effects of inbreeding with the effects of other intelligence-related variables such as socioeconomic status may lead the effects of inbreeding to be overestimated2. Unfortunately statistical control may either over- or under-correct for the correlates of the independent variables, leaving one in doubt about the true effect of inbreeding. I have now examined the effects of inbreeding on cognitive performance in an Arab population with a high rate of consanguinous marriage which minimised the distortions due to non-genetic variables. I show here that offspring of unrelated parents performed better than offspring of first-cousin marriages in intelligence and achievement tests administered at grades 4 and 6. The lowest level of performance and a higher variance were found for offspring of double-cousin marriages. The inbreeding depression found in this study is consistent and cannot be explained by the effects of socioeconomic status. I drew a nationally representative sample of 3,203 children in grades four and six (approximate ages 10 and 12 yr) of the Arab educational system in Israel. This sample constitutes about 10% of the total population in these grades and includes only normal (not retarded) children. Column 1 in Table 1 shows the division of the subjects according to grade level and consanguinity of the parents. A first-cousin marriage is between children of siblings. Children of first cousins have, on average, 1/16 pairs of genes by common descent. Double first cousins are children of siblings married to unrelated siblings. When they marry, their children have, on the average, 2/16 pairs of genes by common descent.
I grew up in a secular household, dumbass. I don't have any religion. Your dick must have gotten so fucking hard from making that post.
The official one.official IQ test says 128, online says 139, no clue who or what to believe
I grew up in a secular household, dumbass. I don't have any religion. Your dick must have gotten so fucking hard from making that post.
And btw, that verse you quoted is also absolutely braindead.
the official one was not mensa or approved by anyone at allThe official one.
Why? So that you can be a better emotional tampon?I think emotional intelligence is more valuable than a high IQ.
What's the official one? From a psychologist?the official one was not mensa or approved by anyone at all
yes, from years back, I was interned in a mental hospital for some problems I was havingWhat's the official one? From a psychologist?
Because I'd rather be neurotypical, emotionally mature and low or below average IQ than emotionally unstable and have a high IQ. You'd be a happier personWhy? So that you can be a better emotional tampon?
High IQ + being a psychopath = unstoppableBecause I'd rather be neurotypical, emotionally mature and low or below average IQ than emotionally unstable and have a high IQ. You'd be a happier person
Then it's not official. JFLthe official one was not mensa or approved by anyone at all
that’s true I feel stupid sometimes, even if on paper im a succcesful student or am socially im behind like most unclesThen it's not official. JFL
For fuck's sake.
It's normal to feel stupid at times. We all go through it when we find something we can't understand the first time around or when we make mistakes we believe we could've avoided.that’s true I feel stupid sometimes, even if on paper im a succcesful student or am socially im behind like most uncles
@CantEscapeYourFate made a IQ challenge thread where High Intelligencecels mogged the fuck out of low iqcels hence they are seething nowThis is the third IQ thread today. Did something happen in these past three weeks that increased the obsession of IQ in users here?
When did this happen?@CantEscapeYourFate made a IQ challenge thread where High Intelligencecels mogged the fuck out of low iqcels hence they are seething now
It is. The only people who say IQ scores aren't accurate are Niggers and other ethnics who have sub 80 IQ.Sounds like ethnic cope