Blackpill It's more SMVnovel to be elegantly androgynous than to be roughly masculine. The same way it's harder to sculpt/ craft a thin longsword than claymore.

[Pinpoint]

And women want to be around regality. The physioimplication females want to be a part of is because a few things.
Tyrannoluxury means that you are not around the earthiness of the world, and you are wanted/ feared/ respected from the get go; by novelty of your supernatural traits, and abilities, and power, etc. Reason women want a white guy is because they are the alpha race, regality. WHereas men are delighted to find boner fod, women want someone who fits more hoops, for instance, as a hero, or a god. No gruntwork. Being buff/ masculine means you still have the need to do gruntwork.
They think, in the lens of supernatural ideal, that a skinny/ effeminate guy (with the nonmalleable traits to be chad tier/ handsome) would not have to carry on the extra weight, and weaknesses which come with being masculine.
Women love the tyrannoluxuriant in that they get away with whatever they want. Women hate having to work hard or live non-regally. Being polished/ elegant is their desire.
Arising, and being emancipated from masculinity is a thing these girls who like androgynousness like. And there's more distinguishment to it these days evermore, and not masculinity.

So A. Because their nonmalleable traits, in a refined/ insulated/ modern sentiment world do not need to be rough and masculine, and it implies class/ sophistication/ removal from the rougher elements which will callus your physique to be rough as well. Shows familial, or filial sophistication. More room than ever for this.

B. Because women love Tyrannoluxuriance. Tyrannoemancipation/ luxuriance and freedom, or ascendance from having primally valued traits, or competitively competent traits. Such tyrannoluxuriance that he can be androgynous, and make it without following the generic pattern of masculinity except where he wants it. It's why a chad looks more refined/ pretty than rough and big bubba-ish. That's why chads are wanted more than black tyrones, more refinement... Where a man, because he is tyrannical/ dominarchal, has had the primal hierarchal value to be removed from the rawer elements of the world, and carries the essentials of being chad/ dominant/ refined with them. This means he wouldn't have a small dick as that would be a nonmalleable traits to be wanted even if he were androgynous (in most cases where androgynousness is valued; where they want someone with the essentials or dominarchal signals of chad or masculine guy, but they don't live by any restrictions a masculine life brings, but they DO have the advantages of it). Because of xenoestrogens/ and GMOs, then decaying in a lot of tissue is kind of.. semimalleable, but it's inconsquential for women to calculate that. A lot of them simply observe what is there, and disregard a lot of the context.

C. Women secretly want the filiational ego-gain of being around people with clever power, rather than solid power. So a person with clever power will be someone who relies on technique and has an athletic build rather than burly. They want a guy who thinks he can fight/ use his body to use more clever/ impressive/ intricate moves than power moves. It's demeanor/ personality value. And they love to destroy the power of masculinity men have for the underlying power women have.

D. The physioimplication is that someone has transcended masculinity when they're tall, and sculpted in the right way to be hot. Meaning they're above the gruntwork that masculinity implies. Masculinity: that is a cheap substance in the minds of many esoteric women for men to get SMV value because it's more attainable through changeable traits by gymceling. Like how it is easy to make a thick sand castle rather than one that has a sleek design to it (requires more intricateness/ mindfulness/ balance/ etc). And the sleekness is dependent on nonmalleable traits which might subcommunicate the tyrannoluxury/ sleekluxury/ classy physioimplication (if they could pull off survival in harsh past environments being elegant and not burly, and being burly is more obvious/ simple/ easy). That's why finding formliness/ shapeliness in a hard to reach/ hard to stay place will imply that someone's natural inclination defies what is natural most. Highermanarchy, vs lowermanarchy. Women are searching for the kind of regality that transcends the masculine.

D-2. The more exposure if you're svelte as a guy will reveal more about your nonmalleable traits. Peopel cover up their insecurities with muscle in a lot of ways. but you're exposing your frame, and thingsthat are not malleable at all. There's birth-based-malleability that virtually makes it nonmalleable unless you get it from birth, or from growing condition outside of action-based-malleability. BBM vs. ABM.
Women want value that is based on birth based malleability because when they have eceeding value in it then it stands as a near permanent, and highly novel trait in comparison with other men. Chances are, if it's rare, and if it's regal then guys will fear it as they can do nothing about your own non-malleable traits.
Highly regal nonmalleable traits speak volumes more than muscles about your race, genetics, lineage, maybe even all the thigns that also come from those traits like reflexes, demeanor, ornateness, disposition, behavior, motor skills, manneristic coordination, etc.
People feel a lot more from a tall lanky french guy with aquiline features than a buff filipino guy for that reason.

 

[Barry]

what the fuck is this shit

try and look regal when the captain of the football team flushes your head in the school toilets

then see what all the stacys think of your tyrannoluxuriant theories

 

[Pinpoint]

what the fuck is this shit

try and look regal when the captain of the football team flushes your head in the school toilets

then see what all the stacys think of your tyrannoluxuriant theories

Women think in the lens of ideal, rather than looking in the lens of the practical.
Some can be that way is all I'm saying. Not all, but there's gotta be a reason people with british accents and the right facial aesthetic for goth tim burton shit even if they stand below 6' can get laid.

Women prefer ornateness the more civilized the world becomes.
A thick sand castle holds better, but a thin sand castle looks more regal/ ornate/ built for an interesting, and advanced time. And the implication is that someone, if they're thin, looks like they've transcended the situation of needing to sacrifice grace for practicality.
I mean a woman is thinking, if that thing ornate sand castle were a person, then the person must feel it can get by being nongenerically practical. Maybe they're so powerful they're not needing to show out their power in the first place. I mean they're beautiful as is in the right places that are essential already, not some scrawny nerd, so maybe they do got it together in a sophisticated, agile, mysterious way.

 

[Michael15651]

Your threads are highly accurate and valid, but between vocabulary and length of them, I don't know how you do it.

 

[Darth Cialis]

Chad doesn't need to make up words.

 

[Tempus Edax Rerum]

Don't they have some Disney movies made on this central idea? ...or at the very least isn't this idea really prevalent in the sublte subtext of a lot of Disney films aimed at little girls.

Well, basically your father namely the King Great Skullcracker, and you the refined and cultured prince of the Skull Cracker who has never stepped on the battlefield... rather you like to ride horses, practices fencing, and read philosophy in your spare time...

They don't want the King who had to crack skulls, and fight for his royal position, they want someone who was born into royalty, and has the blood of a brute...yet is above and beyond the realm of brutes...someone that has evolved or ascended past that animal conflict. Women want someone with the qualities of the divine, the higher.

Aka: The Richard

Chad doesn't need to make up words.

Unironically that's what he said.

 

[Pinpoint]

Don't they have some Disney movies made on this central idea? ...or at the very least isn't this idea really prevalent in the sublte subtext of a lot of Disney films aimed at little girls.

Well, basically your father namely the King Great Skullcracker, and you the refined and cultured prince of the Skull Cracker who has never stepped on the battlefield... rather you like to ride horses, practices fencing, and read philosophy in your spare time...

They don't want the King who had to crack skulls, and fight for his royal position, they want someone who was born into royalty, and has the blood of a brute...yet is above and beyond the realm of brutes...someone that has evolved or ascended past that animal conflict. Women want someone with the qualities of the divine, the higher.

If the great king skullcracker has underlying reflexes/ motor coordination/ power that will be passed down after 10 generations of his rule securing peace to his people, and gathering the finest genes for his children, and they end up being androgynous male model abercrombie stars, then they will be more sexually desirable than the foot soldiers on the battle field who are sub7 by miles even if they never see a fight. People that high up have a ton of love/ sugar/ power from the inside and so they can play pretend power with the sensationalistic girls. until they get their ass handed to them by someone who actually has real field experience. Then women will be in doubt and want to go back to practical value. We live in the insulationarchy. The insulation of humanitarian heartful sensibilities makes people think the worst is behind us. The West has had the sweet arms of technology to secure this delusion.

Yes women want the divine and higher elements to power, and prosperity. Women want to capture a fantasy, and may someday hope to make it with someone with fantastical elements who can prevail over the practical/ real/ fortified.

 

[femalesentience]

@Tempus Edax Rerum
great point about disney. its no mistake why those movies have had such an enduring impact on our generation's psychology. women want a prince moreso than a warrior. and if they had to choose a warrior they would prefer a warrior prince.

simply puy women admire and desire elevation. men and women alike unequipped for elevation deride it out of butthurt of being implicitly rejected. they cope by calling it queer, effeminate, what have you, knowing full well they would relish in its experience if they possessed the qualities to do so.

 

[Pinpoint]

@Tempus Edax Rerum
great point about disney. its no mistake why those movies have had such an enduring impact on our generation's psychology. women want a prince moreso than a warrior. and if they had to choose a warrior they would prefer a warrior prince.

simply puy women admire and desire elevation. men and women alike unequipped for elevation deride it out of butthurt of being implicitly rejected. they cope by calling it queer, effeminate, what have you, knowing full well they would relish in its experience if they possessed the qualities to do so.

refinement desires refinement. it's the butch girls who want to avoid the archetype traits of a prince/ anime, vampire, etc.
they don't want a soft boy. they want a boy who has wit, charisma, power if it is in the state of refinement.
They want a tyrannocleared person. Someone who is dominant, but also someone who doesn't need to abide by any of the taxes of being dominant, yet still has the elegant/ beautiful traits that evoke the underlying impression of high lineage value.

Women want their man to make people feel weak and retarded to their natural/ inborn abilities. We all get an inception of the impact of life when we are born. Some are faster, spryer, hardy, quick-reflexed when we are at school/ gym class. Those who have to work out to feel secure away from their anxiety are weak to women. Women want those with sharp/ precise motor coordinations instead of people who are turtling strength at the gym to have power until the point they don't feel insecure anymore. It's the protoproficienarchy, where someone is valuable from the beginning of their experience/ life/ offhand abilities without any pause/ plan/ process for external refinement.
And those things are intuitively programmed within women to be looked out for keenly.

The penalty of being given a laborer life is probably equivalent to being born beta to women.
Women hate things that are callused, and only want those of high domineering posture in every area of life.
They want people pure, and implicative of protopower/ protoproficiency in areas of looks, money, and status. They hate anything un-virgin, and marginalized at any point in life. They want to keep the purity of the food chain, and the linkage of it KNOWN, because they want to be with highborns.
Women want the judgment all around them to be in the positive, and someone who is a newcomer to alpha-ry will be hated on because women want to look dominant from any scope, any memory span, and perception.
Women are dainty/ elegant and refined because they want to make a splash with their existence, and not just becuase they have a taste for finery, but because they have narcissistic natures.

 

[femalesentience]

the distance between someones desires and their reality is the extent to which they cope. men and women alike. although women desire tyrannoluxuriant elevation, indeed, crave and aspire to it, they are forced to contend with the reality of their nonmalleable smv insofar as it inhibits their upward potential. as such they'll cope by feigning admiration for hard work, traditional masculinity, blue collar values such that it secures them the best male in their league aka a mid tier beta or a high tier delta.

 

[IncelGenocide]

Many of those words do not exist.

 

[Pinpoint]

Many of those words do not exist.

nor did the word genocide b4 ww2, but here it is.
Incels are in a war, and so, term churning is necessary.

the distance between someones desires and their reality is the extent to which they cope. men and women alike. although women desire tyrannoluxuriant elevation, indeed, crave and aspire to it, they are forced to contend with the reality of their nonmalleable smv insofar as it inhibits their upward potential. as such they'll cope by feigning admiration for hard work, traditional masculinity, blue collar values such that it secures them the best male in their league aka a mid tier beta or a high tier delta.

tyrannoluxuriance they crave more from men than anything, and the finish line changes/ revolves around the state of civilization, and its envisionment of glamour.
They want people who have the power from the most protoproficiency which, by denotation is completely nigh nonmalleable (motor coordination, race, face, background, etc.)
They try to sniff out the produced from the blessed constantly. To fool them is near impossible but everything must pass in some extent.
women want the nice/ fancy sandcastles, and not the ones meant to withstand tidal waves, for those are not elegant, and thus not decorative for glamour.