Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL normies and foids are losing their minds on twitter after finding out Franz Kafka was an incel/escortcel

  • Thread starter 67InchesSubhuman
  • Start date
Screenshot 20240204 025044
 
@rope infinity ♾️
 
Never began for Kafkacels
 
Egon Schiele still takes the prize for most perverted artist in early twentieth century Austria
 
Boys, we’re Kafkaesque. ROFL
 
why are they so shocked over this? lots of great minds were like this.
 
he had a fiance according to google
Screenshot 20240204 030956 Brave 1
 
images


Kafka was based, become Kafka pilled
 
339B71C9 10BD 45EA BA0C 4D4B77299A41

He was an incel but I don’t want that so he wasn’t :foidSoy:
 
Did he say something based on women?
When I meet a pretty girl and ask her: Please, come with me!' and she passes me in silence, then what she means is this: 'You are no Duke with a name to conjure with, no powerfully built American Indian with square-shouldered physique, with calm impassive gaze, with skin laved by the air of the prairies and the rivers that irrigate them, you have never been to the great lakes, or sailed on them, wherever they are to be found. So, tell me, why should a pretty girl like me go with you?' 'You forget that no automobile is carrying you swaying through the street in powerful thrusts; I don't seem to see a retinue of gentlemen pressed into livery attending you, murmuring blessings as they follow you in a pedantic semicircle; your breasts are stowed away tidily enough into your corset, but your hips and thighs make up for that parsimony; you are wearing a taffeta dress with plisse pleats of he sort that delighted us last autumn, and - garbed in this menace as you are - still you don't scruple to throw us a smile from time to time.' 'Yes, we are both quite right, and, lest we become irrefutably persuaded of the fact, why don't we now go to our separate homes.
it's from the rejection.
This is the only thing I remember.
 
Those that paved the way for inventions that enable women to have an easier life & more freedom were in many cases incel or "creepy". The irony is those that helped them the most went extinct & are only recognised for their contributions after they're dust with no living legacy to carry on the potential for more standout achievements.
 
Dude, it takes one reading of The Metamorphosis to understand not just the experience of being a undesirable joke of a human being, but what would motivate a man to write on it.
 
And why do normies care what Kafka did? Is there some new movie or some shit?
 
Dude, it takes one reading of The Metamorphosis to understand not just the experience of being an undesirable joke of a human being, but what would motivate a man to write on it.
Exactly. It’s the perfect book of how a man would get treat on if his low status and undesirable. Like legit how Gregory descend into self deprecation and how his family gradually lost love towards him is perfect represantation of how a man will be treated if they start neeting and such.

And the most brutal one when Gregor parent see how beautiful his sister was by the end and think about the plan of marrying her and how their lives as a family is gonna get better even when


. They still felt relieve about him
, because he don’t burden them anymore even afterall he has done for them, they still see their future going better and was relief. Which prove that woman had INTRSTIC value while men had to earn value and if he don’t well fuck him right?
 
Last edited:
And why do normies care what Kafka did? Is there some new movie or some shit?
Why do normies read kafka? It’s the book for incel and pessimist tbh
 
Not everyone can have sex. Besides, she's a nasty foid fuck.
 
But why do normies suddenly care what Kafka was... Like what's the reason of hype.
Because normies are cloud chaser. When their YouTuber said this book is good. They will cludchasing to say that they like it too.

Just as with pewdiepie with no longer human situation
 
When the book is the mentalcel book which normies and chad can’t never relate. Nt people mostly can’t relate with this book
 
I still don't understand what's so great about kafka, he seems huge in the female sphere for some reason.
no, I refuse to read any of his books btw
 
I still don't understand what's so great about kafka, he seems huge in the female sphere for some reason.
no, I refuse to read any of his books btw
just foids trying to look intellectual, cultured, 'not like other girls', etc.
 
Those that paved the way for inventions that enable women to have an easier life & more freedom were in many cases incel or "creepy". The irony is those that helped them the most went extinct & are only recognised for their contributions after they're dust with no living legacy to carry on the potential for more standout achievements.
brutal. this makes me wanna rope. i hate retards who have it easy. they dont even give credit or be a civil person.
 
I still don't understand what's so great about kafka, he seems huge in the female sphere for some reason.
no, I refuse to read any of his books btw
What do you mean you STILL don't understand if you never even read him in the first place?
 
What do you mean you STILL don't understand if you never even read him in the first place?
I see him mentioned a lot but can't surmise what the big deal is from context.
even if you've never seen a pussy you can still get an idea why men like pussy just from context
 
I see him mentioned a lot but can't surmise what the big deal is from context.
even if you've never seen a pussy you can still get an idea why men like pussy just from context

Yeah, it's all about context, not looks.

Unlike pussy, or a nice car, or a bowl of ice cream, you can't just look at a reference to someone who had ideas you've never read and understand it based on "context." You'd actually have to read the ideas themselves. Context comes from actually reading his content, not hearing about him in passing.

It's much like bluepilled normies whose only context of blackpill inceldom is what they're told about it from third-party sources. They don't know anything about what actual incels are saying. Based upon "context," they know everything they need to know about us, even if they've never visited a site like this and refuse to, because the few things they've seen about inceldom seem bad.

If you don't want to read Kafka, no problem, but piss-poor example you gave here.
 
It's much like bluepilled normies whose only context of blackpill inceldom is what they're told about it from third-party sources
there's nothing IRL that disproves the blackpill so you're already wrong there. if kafka's ideas rang true to all these females then they can be seen IRL.
tell a bluepilled normie tall people fuck and all they have to do is look around them to verify, which of kafka's ideas reflect IRL?
If you don't want to read Kafka, no problem, but piss-poor example you gave here.
I won't
 
there's nothing IRL that disproves the blackpill so you're already wrong there.
I never said there was. I was comparing your rationale to a bluepill normie shying away from a blackpill site based on second-hand "context,"

"I don't see the appeal and have been told to stay away because those evil incels frequent those blackpilled sites, so I'll never read it and think for myself."

I'm not trying to advocate for Kafka, I just see the poor "logic" in play with you. By the way, who are ALL THESE FOIDS that love "muh Kafka" ?

It's also true that it's not WHAT you say, it's who you are while saying it. Many of the ideas expressed here probably would be approved by foids if either CHAD or a long-dead nobody said them. When we say them, they're suddenly EVIL because of who we are, what we look like, and the fact that we haven't been dead for 100 years.
 
By the way, who are ALL THESE FOIDS that love "muh Kafka" ?
reddit, goodreads and local book club facebook groups
It's also true that it's not WHAT you say, it's who you are while saying it
yeah? how's that stopping me from getting a read on kafka based on context? I can figure out harper lee didn't actually love niggers from online discourse about "To Kill A Mockingbird" and lovecraft was a proto-redditor from all the backtracking he did after his cat named nigger died. how's kafka exempt from this?
 
More infuriating is women acting like they can relate to him.
 
Kafka is based i remember i had a folder on my old pc full of his quotes.

Didnt know he was a kike tho brutal :feelswhat:
 
yeah? how's that stopping me from getting a read on kafka based on context? I can figure out harper lee didn't actually love niggers from online discourse about "To Kill A Mockingbird" and lovecraft was a proto-redditor from all the backtracking he did after his cat named nigger died. how's kafka exempt from this?

I don't care if you read Kafka or not. But I will say this...

To Kill a Mockingbird is the only thing that Harper Lee ever wrote. So, yes, based on context, you don't need to actually read Harper Lee. Anything and everything anyone says about her writing is based on that one book.

I don't know much about Lovecraft. Lots of people like him, seems he was a proto-science fiction writer. Though I thought most people who liked his crap were geeky men. Not sure. Also not sure if he was a proto-redditor. Could be, I don't know, but maybe you're actually taking things out of context with him.

Kafka is kind of exempt though, and here's why I say this: Kafka didn't write a whole lot, but he had more than just one book. It seems like most normies who "read Kafka" are almost always talking about only one of his works The Metamorphosis (or possibly The Trial). So, in a strange way, they're "Harper Leeing" Kafka. But unlike Harper Lee who really did have only one book, Kafka actually wrote a few novels that hardly anyone seems to pay attention to.

So, if you're trying to understand Kafka based on "context" from what normies say about him, you must realize that you can't approach him the same way you would Harper Lee (who really only had ONE novel).

The Castle and, even better, Amerika, have situations and dialogues that sound like they could have been written by a trucel on these forums. If Kafka wasn't an incel, he clearly knew how the incel mind worked (especially in relation to normies) 100 years before this website even existed. And in all the context I've seen, normies only talk about The Metamorphosis. So, I think you're basing everything you know about Kafka on normies' perception of the only Kafka book they've ever read. Normies will often sidestep that which isn't palatable.

To Kill and Mocking Bird and The Metamorphasis are normie-approved. The two more obscure Kafka novels have situations and dialogue that could have been written by a bluepilled KHHV as he becomes blackpilled.
 
Last edited:
I don't care if you read Kafka or not. But I will say this...

To Kill a Mockingbird is the only thing that Harper Lee ever wrote. So, yes, based on context, you don't need to actually read Harper Lee. Anything and everything anyone says about her writing is based on that one book.

I don't know much about Lovecraft. Lots of people like him, seems he was a proto-science fiction writer. Though I thought most people who liked his crap were geeky men. Not sure. Also not sure if he was a proto-redditor. Could be, I don't know, but maybe you're actually taking things out of context with him.

Kafka is kind of exempt though, and here's why I say this: Kafka didn't write a whole lot, but he had more than just one book. It seems like most normies who "read Kafka" are almost always talking about only one of his works The Metamorphosis (or possibly The Trial). So, in a strange way, they're "Harper Leeing" Kafka. But unlike Harper Lee who really did have only one book, Kafka actually wrote a few novels that hardly anyone seems to pay attention to.

So, if you're trying to understand Kafka based on "context" from what normies say about him, you must realize that you can't approach him the same way you would Harper Lee (who really only had ONE novel).

The Castle and, even better, Amerika, have situations and dialogues that sound like they could have been written by a trucel on these forums. If Kafka wasn't an incel, he clearly knew how the incel mind worked (especially in relation to normies) 100 years before this website even existed. And in all the context I've seen, normies only talk about The Metamorphosis. So, I think you're basing everything you know about Kafka on normies' perception of the only Kafka book they've ever read. Normies will often sidestep that which isn't palatable.

To Kill and Mocking Bird and The Metamorphasis are normie-approved. The two more obscure Kafka novels have situations and dialogue that could have been written by a bluepilled KHHV as he becomes blackpilled.
so you're telling me to read Amerika? I'm not falling for it kafkacel, I'll pick The Castle or Amerika if I find them at a book sale but that's it
 
so you're telling me to read Amerika? I'm not falling for it kafkacel, I'll pick The Castle or Amerika if I find them at a book sale but that's it

No, man. I'm not telling you to read anything. In fact, I flat out said, "I don't care if you read Kafka or not."

I'm starting to wonder if you actually have trouble with context in the first place. And I'm not saying that to be a jerk. I'm saying that because you're response here really misses the point.

You asked me what makes Kafka exempt from "context." My response is basically that normies side-step the more blackpilled Kafka, don't even acknowledge those works. All your "context" is based on a normie lens. That contextual lens may work fine for Harper Lee, and maybe even Lovecraft. With Kafka, your "context" is myopic, because normies will excise all that additional stuff that I just explained to you, and you wouldn't even know it was there. That's what makes Kafka exempt from your limited normie-sanctioned lens. I was trying to answer your question.
 
No, man. I'm not telling you to read anything. In fact, I flat out said, "I don't care if you read Kafka or not."

I'm starting to wonder if you actually have trouble with context in the first place. And I'm not saying that to be a jerk. I'm saying that because you're response here really misses the point.

You asked me what makes Kafka exempt from "context." My response is basically that normies side-step the more blackpilled Kafka, don't even acknowledge those works. All your "context" is based on a normie lens. That contextual lens may work fine for Harper Lee, and maybe even Lovecraft. With Kafka, your "context" is myopic, because normies will excise all that additional stuff that I just explained to you, and you wouldn't even know it was there. That's what makes Kafka exempt from your limited normie-sanctioned lens. I was trying to answer your question.
yeah you explained well the first time I'm just messing with you
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top