Blackpill "Not all men were meant to reproduce"

[IsaaqYare]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/15gdsy1/not_all_men_were_meant_to_reproduce/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3


I see this argument being used as a justification for our inceldom and how it's actually a good thing that our genes are not being passed on. How would you respond to this?

 

[Nate Higgers]

How would you respond to this?

Subhuman genes still get passed on anyway because all women can reproduce regardless of their genetic quality, why does short shitskin foids get to reproduce and not shitskin manlets?
I'm fine with eugenics as long as it goes both ways

 

[bad]

That applies in both ways. Rape is always an option.

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

I'd probably just thank them for acknowledging the blackpill and ask them why do they have a problem with the undesirable men having their own spaces where they can talk about their issues.

Though, if I were in a sour mood or wanted to argue, I'd ask them why they think that just because nature doesn't intend for some men to reproduce then they actually shouldn't. After all, nature has also created a variety of dealy illnesses to regularly cull the human population, yet humanity has been fighting those illnesses for millenia. Likewise, you could make a very good case that the men who are enjoying reproductiry success shouldn't be enjoying it, and that we need to artificially make sure that more of the men women don't want to reproduce with have children as well, because those men reproducing might not be as good as it were if humanity was still primitive.

Traits are passed on to children, so the next generation will have more of the traits to the right of the dotted line, and fewer of those to the left. You can stop the video and look at this carefully. At the top, the traits most rapidly spreading in the next generation are ADHD, smoking, extraversion, high BMI, and large waist circumference. These last two are measures of fatness. Heart disease, depression, Alzheimer’s, and schizophrenia are also on the right. To the left are the traits that are being bred out, and at the bottom, being bred out most rapidly, are three measures of intelligence.

Evolution Goes into Reverse - American Renaissance

What to do about it.

www.amren.com

More psychopathic men tend to receive higher attractiveness ratings from women - incels.wiki

Antisocial, criminal and violent men have greater sexual access to women - incels.wiki

Male gang members have dramatically more female sexual partners - incels.wiki

Childhood bullies experience greater sexual success than non-bullies - incels.wiki

Misogynistic men are more sexually active than most men - incels.wiki

"Indeed, victims of bullying have been found to have reduced odds of dating over time"

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/14gxdcx/is_adolescent_bullying_an_evolutionary_adaptation/ "Relations with dating sometimes vary by gender and form of bullying: boys who employ physical bullying reported more dating partners than other boys" Alphas/Chads always win...

incels.is

Subhuman genes still get passed on anyway because all women can reproduce regardless of their genetic quality, why does short shitskin foids get to reproduce and not shitskin manlets?
I'm fine with eugenics as long as it goes both ways

Yup, that's true as well. They reproduce even more actually.

Children are more likely to inherit criminal tendencies from mothers, women are not "bettering the gene pool."

We've all seen the bullshit claims that women need to be picky, because they are "bettering the gene pool" by not having children with "low value males", the implication being that women can't be "low value" and that all of them have inherent value that means they deserve to have children...

incels.is

 

[Ahnfeltia]

Though, if I were in a sour mood or wanted to argue, I'd ask them why they think that just because nature doesn't intend for some men to reproduce then they actually shouldn't. After all, nature has also created a variety of dealy illnesses to regularly cull the human population, yet humanity has been fighting those illnesses for millenia.

This'd be the gist of my argument too.

In addition, I'd point out that there'll always be undesirable men, at least relatively speaking. Women choosing alpha males boils down to them choosing the best few of the bunch -- i.e., to adopt a relative as opposed to an absolute standard. I see no reason why this problem would've been any less pernicious in bygone eras without monogamy. This is in response to the second sentence of the Reddit post.

 

[Darkday]

Subhuman genes still get passed on anyway because all women can reproduce regardless of their genetic quality, why does short shitskin foids get to reproduce and not shitskin manlets?
I'm fine with eugenics as long as it goes both ways

Perfect answer

 

[Grim_Reaper]

Not all foids were meant to not get raped.

 

[Ahnfeltia]

Not all foids were meant to not get raped.

Succinct and witty.

 

[BrootalPill]

Something i firmly believe is that, 9/10 times it's the foid reason why there are genetically inferior men.

 

[Man]

They conflate sex love belonging and relationships with reproduction, which not all males accomplished, many intentionally (mouths to feed)

Historically, not all men produced children that lived until adulthood, but all men had sex, love, and belonging.

Basically a red herring.

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

This'd be the gist of my argument too.

In addition, I'd point out that there'll always be undesirable men, at least relatively speaking. Women choosing alpha males boils down to them choosing the best few of the bunch -- i.e., to adopt a relative as opposed to an absolute standard. I see no reason why this problem would've been any less pernicious in bygone eras without monogamy. This is in response to the second sentence of the Reddit post.

Exactly.

 

[Blackpill Monk]

Enforced monogamy and the limitation of female mate selection is what allowed mankind to create advanced civilizations in the first place. Since they were no longer forced to spend their time competing for women, men could now start focussing their efforts towards inventing technologies that would allow our species to move forward and create modern society. Without all those "genetically inferior" men being allowed to reproduce thanks to monogamy there would be no internet for you to spew your nonsense onto, so sit down and check your privilege whore.

Giving freedom to women is the destruction of society

 

[Trannydestroyer]

Subhuman genes still get passed on anyway because all women can reproduce regardless of their genetic quality, why does short shitskin foids get to reproduce and not shitskin manlets?
I'm fine with eugenics as long as it goes both ways

Right

 

[LeFrenchCel]

Rape is always the option.

 

[wastedTime]

That applies in both ways. Rape is always an option.

but wont she simply remove the child if you rape her ?

 

[mcmoohyun]

Not all the women were meant to be avoided from the danger of getting raped and killed. Period.

 

[REEject]

Not all foids were meant to not get raped.

 

[Kamikaze]

meanwhile subhuman foids shit out kids. okay fam.

 

[dolph99]

I agree that it's not as simple as the poster suggests. For example, I'm a doctor, son of engineer, and I get nothing from women, while killers and criminals swim in pussy. Maybe not the pussy I would prefer, but pussy nonetheless.

Huge variations in humankind now that we have gotten to 8 billion. It's all unnatural. Maybe I wouldn't have been born in the past, but neither would all the criminals and chads, because they exist and often gain their fortune in an industrial, scientific world created by past incel tier men in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Nobody really fucking knows. I know for sure the worth of foids and chads is hyperinflated.

 

[Drakul]

By her logic if I beat her bf I can rape her

 

[FakeFakecel]

Subhuman genes still get passed on anyway because all women can reproduce regardless of their genetic quality

 

[NigerianCel.]

Not all foids were meant to not get raped.

this lol

 

[JudeoBiden]

If this is true, then laws still need to change radically. If reproduction is going to be a game of musical chairs, then I have the right to use my strength to take someone's chair away. If it's okay that some men can't attract women, then it's okay that some men can't hold on to women because they're weak. But, as usual, it's a double-standard. So no, every man has the right to reproduce, and if some sexhaver disagrees, I'm knocking him out and fucking his bitch.

 

[futureprettyboy]

"Pre-civil action era". They love to bring up the ancestral environment, in which men were chosen to be protectors and providers of women, like we no longer live in an industrial society. You don't need a broad-shouldered, tall, and strong man as much as you would need them back then because those times are long gone.

Guess what happened to women back then? They were raped. Men killed each other for crumbs of pussy. There were no laws. If the person who wrote this wants to go back, fine! Give up everything: the Constitution, technology, Reddit, and Tinder.

"Just let women genocide the majority of men because of nature."

It is a naturalistic fallacy that something is right because it is natural. Rape is natural. Incest is natural. Abandoning defective babies are natural. Polygamy is natural. Promiscuity is natural.

Many wicked things can be found in nature, yet we don't see that cunt defending it. I wonder why.

Also, there are more to men than stature and broad shoulders. What about intelligent men that are ugly? Isn't intelligence necessary for the survival of the species? What about hardworking men that are ugly? What about empathetic men that are ugly? Resourceful ugly men?

Fact: Mediocre and ugly men have contributed to society more than highly attractive men. Most inventors and discoverers were average to below average in looks.

 

[BlueCore]

meanwhile subhuman foids shit out kids. okay fam.

 

[RegularManlet]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/15gdsy1/not_all_men_were_meant_to_reproduce/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3


I see this argument being used as a justification for our inceldom and how it's actually a good thing that our genes are not being passed on. How would you respond to this?

The stuff females select for is primitive and pointless in our current society anyway.

 

[asdfghjqbbbb]

Does the guy who posted this consider himself genetically inferior?

 

[wereq]

Subhuman genes still get passed on anyway because all women can reproduce regardless of their genetic quality, why does short shitskin foids get to reproduce and not shitskin manlets?
I'm fine with eugenics as long as it goes both ways

 

[Cletus Longthing]

Ugly men were meant to rape