On the impossibility of dominating the "fairer" sex

nessahan alita

nessahan alita

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Posts
36
Online
2d 18h 15m
Our dear and dangerous females try to tirelessly dominate the relationship to impose the standards that they want, which correspond to the frequency, intensity and quality in dates, phone calls, sex, in the affectionate treatment, in the speech, etc. The one who loves more, that is, who needs more the love of the other, will yield and submit for fear of losing the loved one. The one who loves less will be victorious and will dominate the relationship.

The power to exercise dominion or to be dominated is closely linked to physical beauty (although this is relative and varies in its meaning from one culture to another and even from one man to another. Regardless of his concepts of beauty, a man will tend to weaken more for those who, according to his criteria, find her beautiful. As far as I am concerned, I do not conform to the stereotyped criteria and standards of the twentieth century (youth, body shapes, etc), in the case of woman, and social prominence in the case of man, though not only to these elements.

If you have a girlfriend or wife you may have noticed that she tends to resist against almost everything you want, especially in giving sex just when you need it. This resistance is natural and we should not protest and much less force it. They are obstacles that their unconscious puts to us to see if we can overcome it and prove our masculine value.

Although they are never admitted or recognized by women, the resistance never ceases, not even after decades of marriage. When women are resisting, they are in fact, wanting to be charmed to a point of total emotional drunkenness. They want us to break the resistance, throwing them into a state of madness so that they can no longer resist. If we do not, we are considered incompetent and over time they put on us some beautiful horns because they need crazy and intense emotions (because they are beings of emotional orientation).

This is the reason why they try to dominate us instead of passively submit.

Some ignorant men, desperate for not being able to exercise the dominion over their wives (I refer to the consensual domination that results naturally from the renunciation of coercive domination), strike them physically or psychologically. This attitude is unnecessary, as we will see next.

The woman have sophisticated psychological mechanisms to circumvent any attempt of domination. They are refractory to domination. She resist continuously, even at brute force (the machiavelli's old and well-known phrase portrays this impossibility: "Fortune is a woman and, if you wish to keep her down, you must beat her and pound her". This is not a misogynistic or violent phrase, but a comparison between woman and luck, based on the fact that the first is not allowed to dominate. The intention of the comparison, however, is to show that luck can only be mastered when we beat it in the same way as did the ignorant men in Machiavellian times with women, driven by desperate fury. Machiavelli is not recommending that one should beat in woman, but that one should be lucky. He uses the woman in his sentence for comparison only in order to illustrate that the woman does not allow herself to be dominated), and can only be really influenced by the mastery of an superior emotional force to her. Not everything is lost...

There is a very effective way to protect ourselves and at the same time dominate the relationship without going mad: it consists in renouncing attempt to dominate the female, preferring to dominate our own feelings of possession, jealousy and other weaknesses through the death of our egos. This seems contradictory but really works because women are contradictory and illogical beings in essence, or rather, beings that follow a logic contrary to the one we imagine (this refers specifically to the love field and corresponds only to the formal (rational) sense of logic. However, feelings also have a different logic, distinct from the rational linear, which is the foundation of emotional intelligence and intuition).

Eliphas Lévi told to us that women chain us by our desires (it is the well-known and already quoted phrase: "The woman chains you through your desires. Be a master of your desires and chain the woman"). The desires to be together, to receive sex, affection and love etc, are weaknesses where females tame the males and bring them down.

I add that, besides the desires, they chain us through our feelings. Therefore, if we eliminate feelings and desires, we release them in their own mental dungeons. The shot will backfire due to the specular effect that casts the spell back to the one who sent it. The woman then will fall into the very mental-emotional hell in which she tried to throw us (which constitutes a legitimate emotional defense and works only in case the woman is a smart-ass who tries to cheat us in the love field. If the woman is honest and sincere in the relationship, there will be no spell to be returned and she will not be hit emotionally for anything because reason will be with her). The reason is very simple: as the smart ones need continuous prove that we suffer for them, they are forced to face their own frustration when they find otherwise.

From the beginning of the relationship, we should put more care in ourselves, in what we feel, than in the woman. This does not mean that we have to treat her badly, coldly etc, but only that we need to overcome her in the fields in which we are weak and she is strong (fighting against ourselves and not against them). Jealousy, fury, possession, etc, are weaknesses that are part of the ego and leave us overwhelmed.

Instead of dominating the opposite sex, it is better to dominate the relationship. But to dominate the relationship we have to dominate ourselves. Therefore everything is reduced to self-control. You can not dominate the woman, nor even by brute force. If you ask for something, your request will be kindly refused or delayed indefinitely. If you command, she will test you to find out how far you can go, curious to know how far the relationship is vulnerable; she shall refuse to your comply and shall observe your reactions to make sure your ability to displease her by getting important information about the depth of your attachment, of your degree of emotional dependence. If you physically assault her, you will have to deal with the police or her relatives, besides giving her reason. Therefore, there is no way out but to arm and retaliate emotionally with justice and self-defense. Never let her close conclusions and know how much of her you need.

The woman will offer her treasures to the one who overcame her in her own domains:

"Let the woman be a pure and refined toy like a diamond, in which the virtues of a world that does not yet exist shine!

Shine in your love the glow of a star! Let your hope say: "Let me be the mother of superman!" (...)

May your honor subsist in your love! Usually the woman little understands about honor. May your honor be to love more than you are loved and never to be second." (NIETZSCHE, 1884-1885 / 1985)

She will not give away her treasures and will never love more than she is loved if she is not overcomed in her resistances. But she will not be overcomed unless she fear for something: the loss of a special and different man.

The women love the strong (in spirit) and despise the weak, only submitting it to a power demonstrated and unequivocally proven in their own domains: feelings (to be clearer: it is like a competition where each side tries to overcome the other in the capacity for self-mastery. The one who can bear more and overcome the inner emotional hell in greater depth is the winner). You have to beat them in two opposite fields: that of coldness and affection. We have to overcome them in (interior) force without letting ourselves be taken for their weaknesses, that is, we need to be more cold and indifferent than they are to us, but at the same time, more loving and affectionate than they are with us. Contradictory? Illogical? Yes! And efficient! There is no other way out: be dispassionate and, in certain extent, theatrical. Obviously, you will not dominate her directly, for coercion, but if you reward her at the right moments with certain affection, then you can "tame" her by her own instincts, as it does with wildlife (I return once again to the provocation of the writer Salmanshon). When she acts badly, disappears, does not call, delay sex, pay attention or be kind to another guy, etc, then be indifferent, despise her and disappear within yourself. She will resist, resist it too until it breaks the resistance. Then, when the female submits, reward her with some affection and other nonsense, love letters, flowers, etc, then returning to your distance. Never polarize in the distance or in the affection, switch.

When we treat them in a caring way, they become spoiled, rebellious and provocative rather than recognize the value of such wonderful treatment. When we treat them with authority (I refer to the protective and consensual authority), they are sweet and loving. It follows that her provocations and stubbornness are actually demands of a firm masculine posture, very little sentimental. The slightest opening or weakness is quickly perceived through animal instinct and then harnessed.

If you are not willing to be strong (in spirit) and is not inwardly brave, it is best to give up being a male and become a butterfly... or else change your mind and be willing to gain courage.

I see many guys thinking that women will fall in love with them just out of pity. They believe that it is enough to give them love and, therefore, the retribution will be automatic. They are lost.

If you think you just need to be nice to be recognized... you are lost. Throw your head in the toilet and flush it for the sake of future generations.

The main masculine weakness I have seen is the fear of loss. From it derives jealousy, sadness, discomfort and many quarrels.

They constantly evaluate our limits and the degree of power that they have on our will. They watch us and measure how far they can go. They play to the extreme. All with intent to dominate the relationship and not be dominated.

If we really ignore these games, what will be left is their own feelings. They will have played in vain and alone. They will feel lonely, afraid of losing us forever and perhaps come to us without we having to call them. But this is not even true in the world of these enigmatic, absurd, and illogical beings (I refer to illogicality in the love field and in the logical-rational sense of the word) (from the point of view that we have learned).

The most curious and contradictory is that, despite resisting how they can against domination, the females give themselves only to those who exercise domain (I refer to the protective consensual domain resulting from the renunciation of coercive domination), to the best.

Few things give the female much pleasure as knowing that there is a male who suffers for them. Paradoxically, this same male is considered uninteresting and weak, in not providing the strong emotions that leave them fascinated. It will serve, at most, to be a cuckold husband. The greater the suffering of the unfortunate, the greater will be her satisfaction and, contradictorily, her disinterest. This is why they do not feel sorry for those who commit suicide for a great pain of love. The man who kills himself for love is communicating that he is weak and, with this, his sacrifice is meaningless.

Instead of killing ourselves or killing them, it would be better to kill our feelings and desires. Then we can treat them as they treated us or are treating us.

The ability to treat the woman as she treats us allows us to act as if we were her mirror. Her behaviors, not her speech, will be the elements that will govern the relationship.

An big mistake that males make is to believe what women say. Another great mistake is to be fascinated by her affection, tears and fragility, believing that is it signs that the heart is given to them. From here our perdition begins. Let her say at pleasure that she loves you, let her cry to pitchers and believe only in the attitudes that you are witnessing. Above all be guided by concrete behaviors and not by useless and deceptive speech. Do not run after what they say because you will be observed while falling into this weakness.

The world of women we are dealing with is a pestilent den of lies, concealment, manipulation and deception. This is true for all, to a greater or lesser degree, and has its origin in a remote historical past. The space for sincerity with these females seems to be null or nearly null. Therefore, we have to treat them according to these laws, which they are accustomed.

To dominate the relationship, one must be superior to the woman in her forces. It takes cold blood to be more disguised and affectionate than they are with us. It is also appropriate to hide our history of relationships, as they do. This is how we become mysterious.

When we overcome them in their own realms, that is, in the fields of feelings and emotional intelligence, which are the fields in which the women move at will, they spontaneously surrender to us. They come to see us as the only ones, the best and consider us fit to guide and command them.

There are only two possible paths in establishing a prolonged relationship with a smart-ass partner: to dominate (provided she consents or requests, demonstrating this through attitudes) her completely, establishing rules, or leave it absolutely free to do what she wants to do, stimulating her to do everything that appear to be part of her trend. It seems more convenient to try first a patriarchal relationship, with full powers, especially with regard to contact with other males (it is just about an attempt to check whether it is this dominant position that they are wanting and seeking in us), and, secondly, in case it resists the domain, to move to the extreme opposite, throwing her to total freedom (responding thus to the newly discovered request). In both cases we can not be passionate and not even love (I am referring to emotional love, not conscious love) the woman very much. The idealistic is to like just enough to tolerate her company (over time, it may turn out to be a company as pleasant and important as a great friend or sister) and enjoy the benefits of sex. The love, in this sense (emotional love or romantic passion), is the worst degradation of man and a serious defect.

Some women submit easily when we exercise authority and let us guide their lives after testing and verify our firmness of purpose and security (for that is exactly what they were seeking in us). Others, more refractory due to feminist influences, tend to resist more and there are some which definitely do not submit. The latter should be pushed in the opposite direction because they have no vocation whatsoever for the function of wives and even to be permanent companions. They serve only to the casual and superficial sex, having no other use in our love life. They were born for casual sex and are not recommended to a serious relationship (it is the case of those who require man's emotional commitment and fidelity but instead, offer only contradictory behavior and doubts about fidelity. The doubt causes an emotional irritation and that is why we seek certainties).

What makes the smarts ones so refractory and difficult to control is the chaotic and unstable nature of their intense passions and feelings. Their states of mind change suddenly, without any warning. On a moment they are mad of passion and, suddenly, they simply do not want to see our face anymore. Therefore, they are beings in which one can not trust too much. Its dispositions are continuously alternating and automatically does not correspond to our objectives, which is why we must take advantage of the moments when they are "open", available and susceptible to influences to operate on their mood. When they are closed, we have to wait until they change.

Your girlfriend may be unpredictable but will try to induce you to mechanize yourself in the expectation of a behavioral pattern to surprise you with other patterns, driving you crazy. Resist to emotional storms. Be ready for anything. Do not let her contaminate your mind with absurd feelings alternations. Stay centered and do not let yourself be dragged to no one side.

Time is one of the greatest feminine allies. When you are resented with fair reason, and then you maintain yourself away, your partner will patiently count on the time for you to change. She will wait and wait patiently for the transformation. There is even a slang for such a trick: "to cook". It is another mode of domination over our mind.

Never forbid anything. The prohibition encourages disobedience (for prohibition has the effect of stimulating desire rather than restraining it) and provides arguments in favor of an supposed arbitrary authoritarianism on your part. Instead of forbidding, leave the little devil with no way out by creating situations that reverse the consequences of her undesirable attitudes. Comunicate, unilaterally, decisions that attain her starting on her own mistakes. Tie her up for her own ideas and attitudes.
 
Last edited:
Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
33,389
Online
112d 16h 35m
Are you the OG Nessahan Alita?
 
HueHueBr

HueHueBr

Allcel
★★★
Joined
Mar 16, 2019
Posts
1,209
Online
15d 14h 52m
You will probably be banned, and with good reason. Nessahan Alita's teachings only apply to those who have a relationship with women. In the case of those who are not even seen as human beings by them, there is no use. So please get out of here.
 
Emba

Emba

falling though the cracks
★★★★★
Joined
May 19, 2019
Posts
24,180
Online
90d 15h 0m
"If you have a girlfriend or wife you may have noticed that she tends to resist against almost everything you want, especially in giving sex just when you need it."

Can't notice something you don't have access too!
 
kampman

kampman

Irrelevant
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Posts
2,985
Online
92d 17h 37m
Very interesting read, based and high IQ. Foids are like children, the more you see of the world, the more you realize this.

However, like the brocels above me said, this wall of text is completely useless to us.
 
G

GermaniaIncelia

incel vortex
-
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Posts
2,845
Online
23d 14h 10m
 
ThoughtfulCel

ThoughtfulCel

G.O.R.I.L.L.A _M.A.X.I.N.G
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
16,621
Online
243d 7h 2m
I didn't read a single word.

After seeing that you're banned, I'm even more glad I didn't.