This is something I've thought of but now decided to put it into writing. Over the years I've seen this phenomenon over and over again, but I don't know the name for it so I'll call it the "Personal Experience Fallacy".
For example have you guys noticed that when you talk about female nature your critics will say things like:
"How would you know what women are like, you never had personal experience with women"
This always used to irritate me because I would back up my argument with facts and evidence. But these normies always use the "you don't have personal experience" card. This is the "Personal Experience fallacy". The easy way to defeat that fallacy is to use objective truth and common sense.
To show you how stupid this fallacy is, take a look at these following examples.
1. If I warn someone to not put their hand on a hot stove because it can burn your hand, imagine these normies saying:
"how would you know it burns your hand, you never had personal experience!"
2. If I warn someone not to jump off a skyscraper or else they'll die, imagine these normies saying:
"how would you know if someone will die from that jump, you never had personal experience!"
My point is you don't need "personal experience" for things that are common sense objective truths.
It doesn't matter if incels don't have "personal experience" with women, incels are just stating common sense objective truths about women/female nature.
For example have you guys noticed that when you talk about female nature your critics will say things like:
"How would you know what women are like, you never had personal experience with women"
This always used to irritate me because I would back up my argument with facts and evidence. But these normies always use the "you don't have personal experience" card. This is the "Personal Experience fallacy". The easy way to defeat that fallacy is to use objective truth and common sense.
To show you how stupid this fallacy is, take a look at these following examples.
1. If I warn someone to not put their hand on a hot stove because it can burn your hand, imagine these normies saying:
"how would you know it burns your hand, you never had personal experience!"
2. If I warn someone not to jump off a skyscraper or else they'll die, imagine these normies saying:
"how would you know if someone will die from that jump, you never had personal experience!"
My point is you don't need "personal experience" for things that are common sense objective truths.
It doesn't matter if incels don't have "personal experience" with women, incels are just stating common sense objective truths about women/female nature.
