[Blackpill] Posting here made me realize something about historical conflicts

Ethnic Natsoc

Ethnic Natsoc

Banned
-
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Posts
2,984
Online
35d 19h 57m
I don't know who it was exactly but I remember not too long ago, that someone made a thread where he described inceldom as the first movement/group to unite men of all races, religions and political ideologies. When I was contemplating this recently, I realized something about history: when you come down to it, every single conflict between men in history was caused by the hypergamous nature of women.

For example, nationalism generally arises in a society when women start intermixing with other races and the men of their own race start getting less chances at getting a sexual partner because of it. In National-Socialist Germany, propaganda posters and films depicted the relationships between Jewish men and German women (never the opposite) as evil and they of course had the Nuremberg laws which outlawed marriages between Jews and Germans. So nationalism arises when men lose the monopoly on women of their own race. The main concern among white nationalists in Europe and America as well is the interbreeding between women (again, never men) of their race with men of other races. This is not limited to whites though, there were news articles for example about Middle-Easterners in France who are frustrated with their women marrying/dating black men.

Socialism could be said to arise when lower-class men no longer have the financial opportunity to marry or otherwise gain a sexual partner. The wealthy elite get all the women for themselves. Something similar happened in Islamic countries where polygamy is legal, where the rich elite men married most of the women, leaving the lower class unable to find a partner thus leading them to joining terrorist organizations like Boko Haram.

On the subject of religion, religion's main purpose has in my opinion always been to legitimize the institution of marriage. As we see in the west, women generally don't feel like remaining loyal to their partner in marriage without a faith forcing them to. We see that religious uprisings often happen right after women get more rights and thus get more opportunity to be whores and not give sub-8 men a chance, just look up photos of Iranian women before and after the Islamic revolution.

So basically, all ideologies exist purely for sub-8 men to increase the chance of gaining a sexual partner and all ideological conflicts were essentially a struggle to regain control over women, who naturally lack any form of loyalty for men that aren't Chad. If women were inherently loyal and not hypergamous, many of the major wars of history would not have happened and men of all races and creeds could live together in peace.
 
FlyFace

FlyFace

Memento Mori
Joined
May 3, 2018
Posts
4,000
Online
18d 17h 15m
I remember the thread too.. and I agree with your conclusion about how conflicts arise when mating privileges are revoked.
 
FinnCel

FinnCel

Alcoholcel
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 13, 2018
Posts
31,639
Online
112d 16h 57m
High IQ post
I hate women
 
G

guaucel

Major
★★★★
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Posts
2,331
Online
48d 17h 25m
woman = whore
 
Teutonic Knight

Teutonic Knight

Mythic
Joined
Mar 2, 2019
Posts
4,595
Online
38d 5h 51m
I wrote that original thread.

 
Inline-g

Inline-g

Banned
-
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Posts
4,744
Online
22d 6h 59m
I disagree, this is reductionism
 
Ethnic Natsoc

Ethnic Natsoc

Banned
-
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Posts
2,984
Online
35d 19h 57m
I wrote that original thread.

Yeah, I had a feeling it was you who made it but I wasn't sure.
 
RREEEEEEEEE

RREEEEEEEEE

2/10 ogre who can't breed, my life matters!
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
33,896
Online
44d 10h 39m
We see that religious uprisings often happen right after women get more rights and thus get more opportunity to be whores and not give sub-8 men a chance, just look up photos of Iranian women before and after the Islamic revolution.
This is factually incorrect. The females in those pictures before the Islamic Revolution were only a minority; most dressed in a way that women in Iran do nowadays. You basically used the soyboy white cuck way of saying "See! This is what Iran looked like before Islam took over!" :feelskek:
 
DirtyCurryCell

DirtyCurryCell

Banned
-
Joined
May 12, 2020
Posts
2,749
Online
25d 9h 29m
I don't know who it was exactly but I remember not too long ago, that someone made a thread where he described inceldom as the first movement/group to unite men of all races, religions and political ideologies. When I was contemplating this recently, I realized something about history: when you come down to it, every single conflict between men in history was caused by the hypergamous nature of women.

For example, nationalism generally arises in a society when women start intermixing with other races and the men of their own race start getting less chances at getting a sexual partner because of it. In National-Socialist Germany, propaganda posters and films depicted the relationships between Jewish men and German women (never the opposite) as evil and they of course had the Nuremberg laws which outlawed marriages between Jews and Germans. So nationalism arises when men lose the monopoly on women of their own race. The main concern among white nationalists in Europe and America as well is the interbreeding between women (again, never men) of their race with men of other races. This is not limited to whites though, there were news articles for example about Middle-Easterners in France who are frustrated with their women marrying/dating black men.

Socialism could be said to arise when lower-class men no longer have the financial opportunity to marry or otherwise gain a sexual partner. The wealthy elite get all the women for themselves. Something similar happened in Islamic countries where polygamy is legal, where the rich elite men married most of the women, leaving the lower class unable to find a partner thus leading them to joining terrorist organizations like Boko Haram.

On the subject of religion, religion's main purpose has in my opinion always been to legitimize the institution of marriage. As we see in the west, women generally don't feel like remaining loyal to their partner in marriage without a faith forcing them to. We see that religious uprisings often happen right after women get more rights and thus get more opportunity to be whores and not give sub-8 men a chance, just look up photos of Iranian women before and after the Islamic revolution.

So basically, all ideologies exist purely for sub-8 men to increase the chance of gaining a sexual partner and all ideological conflicts were essentially a struggle to regain control over women, who naturally lack any form of loyalty for men that aren't Chad. If women were inherently loyal and not hypergamous, many of the major wars of history would not have happened and men of all races and creeds could live together in peace.

This isn't high iq.
This isn't even low iq.

It's a recurring minus iq.

Everything you just said is false. Correlation isn't Causation.

All the movements are forms of Chad worshipping. Or cope. Buddha was 6'7" giga chad prince who had his own harems. Which is why he was able to preach the white pill. If you're a non chad doing what he did, you're just coping. Muhammad was 5'11" , he had his tons of teen pussy, loli pussy and MILF pussy. On top of that he was statusmaxxed and moneymaxxed. Jesus, while likely a fabrication, was clearly a coping mechanism. It might've worked in the days before the internet where women didn't transform into whores. But now it's too left.

As for all the left wing and nationalist revolutions, JFL if you think it was over pussy. Sure sexual frustration might've been a factor. But there were other things at play. Natsocs are basically lefties who want left wing privilleges applied to solely to their own.

AND FURTHER MORE ! IF ALL HISTORICAL CONFLICTS ARE ABOUT GETTING PUSSY, THEN POINT OUT ONE ANTIFA INCEL JFL
 
Algeriancel

Algeriancel

Your striving is insignificant. Let your death be
★★
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Posts
5,110
Online
56d 23h 9m
Usama b. Zaid reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: I have not left after me any (chance) of turmoil more injurious to men than the harm done to the men because of women.
 
Tenshi

Tenshi

もういいよ
★★★★★
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
4,947
Online
37d 7h 42m
didn't read but you may have a point