male circumcision:
en.wikipedia.org
lo, female circumcision:
en.wikipedia.org
Circumcision - Wikipedia
lo, female circumcision:
Wikipedia is open source tho. Anyone can write anything there.
Muslim copers on suiwatchmale circumcision:
Circumcision - Wikipedia
lo, female circumcision:
Female genital mutilation - Wikipedia
View attachment 605330
it's genuinely bizarre how normies turn a blind eye to this barbarism and they gaslight people who just want little boys to have a right not to get essentially raped right after birth 
ok, I get it, you're not mentally strong enough to admit that so many people are evil and participated in this shit more or less conscious of the evil of it, ok, I get you have a buyers remorse and find it hard to accept that you got mutilated for no real reason, ok, maybe you genuinely don't care about your own pp, I can imagine that, but don't fucking gaslight people who DO care and who want little boys not to be branded like slaves (that's pretty much the Biblical basis for the ritual, getting branded as Jewish God's property, slaves were also meant to be circumcised by Jews)
ok, I get it, you're not mentally strong enough to admit that so many people are evil and participated in this shit more or less conscious of the evil of it, ok, I get you have a buyers remorse and find it hard to accept that you got mutilated for no real reason, ok, maybe you genuinely don't care about your own pp, I can imagine that, but don't fucking gaslight people who DO care and who want little boys not to be branded like slaves (that's pretty much the Biblical basis for the ritual, getting branded as Jewish God's property, slaves were also meant to be circumcised by Jews)
I remember seeing bunch of radfem whores in soyyit arguing that how FGM is far worse than MGM and how male circumcision wasn't that bad at all. This reminded me of that ragefuel. Feminists being hypocritical cunts as usual.
Wikipedia is under control of a cabal of jannies who lock articles and remove any wrong think edits
They are no different than soyyit jannies
It is not fucking free in practice at all, especially for politics and history
There are a lot more biases in different conflicts as well
Just read talk pages of these articles, occasionally a few people will call their biases BS out, shills will come to perform mental gymnastics to defend it but then a janny comes and says "Y'all can't behave, locked!"
More news at seven, fuck normies
. Feminists being hypocritical cunts as usual.No, only in theory
Wikipedia is under control of a cabal of jannies who lock articles and remove any wrong think edits
They are no different than soyyit jannies
It is not fucking free in practice at all, especially for politics and history
To the surprise of nobody
There are a lot more biases in different conflicts as well
Just read talk pages of these articles, occasionally a few people will call their biases BS out, shills will come to perform mental gymnastics to defend it but then a janny comes and says "Y'all can't behave, locked!"
Normies have no original thoughts and are perfectly happy being hypocritical cuntsit's genuinely bizarre how normies turn a blind eye to this barbarism and they gaslight people who just want little boys to have a right not to get essentially raped right after birth
More news at seven, fuck normies
I tried to edit on kikepedia a few times and had to quit for the sake of my sanity. Not to mention wikipedia relies on (((academic))) sources which r cucked to hell
High IQ and based thread tbh.
Thank god I was older when they did it and sedated.
I don't remember much but IIRC I was confused and traumatized.
I still am disgusted by the look of uncircumcised penis tho.
Thank god I was older when they did it and sedated.
I don't remember much but IIRC I was confused and traumatized.
I still am disgusted by the look of uncircumcised penis tho.
Ok, but the real question is:
Why did you need proof in the first place to know this was the case? Is it not readily obvious?
Why did you need proof in the first place to know this was the case? Is it not readily obvious?
Wikipedia is open source and you live in a free and democratic society, goyim! Nothing to worry about.
yup completely neutral
Firehose of falsehood - Wikipedia
Biden and Hilary never used the firehose of falsehood amirite
Ukraine never firehoses its falsehoods either
they\re good peoples
It took you this long to realize that?
The content on wikipedia is incredibly heavily regulated by the mods, though. This can easily be seen by going to literally any political and/or controversial article on the site.
This. Try to edit any of those articles and ur shit will be undone in 1/2 hour by some faggot mod for some bullshit reasonIt took you this long to realize that?
The content on wikipedia is incredibly heavily regulated by the mods, though. This can easily be seen by going to literally any political and/or controversial article on the site.
It took you this long to realize that?
The content on wikipedia is incredibly heavily regulated by the mods, though. This can easily be seen by going to literally any political and/or controversial article on the site.
It's not that the mods actually do all the work, it's that the mods have people and attitudes they will always side with
So you have non-mods reverting your shit and you get into a revert-war trying to install the truth (they keep blanking the truth) and a mod intervenes and bans you and not the liar, that's how it works
Well, yeah, that's what I meant, and that's why I said regulated.
This is exactly what happens
Cuckpedia, the zog approved encyclopedia.
Founder of wikipedia is a kike so idk why is anyone surprised at this point
I don't see this in early life section of Jimmy Wales or Larry Sanger, which do you mean
founder IMO doesn't matter as much as who is currently in control
Some Jewish ‘Profiles’ behind the information on the Internet (3)
Wikipedia What is Wikipedia? Wikipedia is an Internet encyclopedia that anyone can edit and add information. Wikipedia claims its articles are based on a “neutral point of view” but a…
dagobertobellucci.wordpress.com
Jimmy Wales
www.foundationforjewishheritage.com
I remember my cousin had to get circumcision at 10 because of phymosis. He said that the recovery was the worst pain ever kek.
wikis me
T
FEMALE GENITAL MULITATION IS BASED
re your 2nd link the Foundation only lists Jimmy as a "friend" does not say he's Jewish himselfSome Jewish ‘Profiles’ behind the information on the Internet (3)
Wikipedia What is Wikipedia? Wikipedia is an Internet encyclopedia that anyone can edit and add information. Wikipedia claims its articles are based on a “neutral point of view” but a…Jimmy Wales
re your 1st Dagoberto Belluci does not list his sources for saying Jimmy is Jew
Sanger wrote he wasn't https://larrysanger.org/2011/01/nope-i-am-not-a-jew-nttawwt/ wondering what evidence we have to contrary
L
Until all forms of genital mutilation are banned with ZERO exemptions, a sociaty is morally irredeemable
It is what it is
kikepedia
Just the tip of the iceberg with these creatures
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
