No , you. In my post , I mentioned shitholes. Hong Kong is not a shit hole. And say it was an oxymoron was a hyerbole. It's a situation so rare that it's not worth mentioning
By % yes, but you are ignoring absolute numbers, and are also being led by migration bias.
Ignore Asians, they are essentially all the same like it or not just basically Han, except the ones who have a lot of austrolesian in them, like Filipinos, Malays, Indonesians.
If you take ethnic to mean the rest, then you are talking massive amounts of genetic variation, a large degree of latitudes covered, hence lots of different people. People from the belt that stretches from Armenia to Probably Delhi, and including Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India are all ethnics.
Then look at the people in this belt with large Aryan, pashtun, Punjabi, admixture, and there is probably a higher % of high PSL guys there than a lot of Anglo countries. There are probably well over 100 million people living in this belt, or a third of USA. You don't see as many in the west, and the ones you do see tend to be low caste Indian and Pakistani who do low class menial jobs, remember caste massively correlates to PSL in India due to the eugenics and lack of access to resources for thousands of years.
The migrant bias goes further because as well as those low class ethnics who migrated, largely because of commonwealth connection and English language, migration is refugee based (clearly low generic value ethnics because they are from the losing side), or skill based, and these skills are the ones high PSL people don't have, because instead of spending age 11-26 acquiring the skills (STEM, medicine, etc), those people in the west spend that time slaying and having fun, and ethnic land high PSL tend to have landed money so don't need to acquire those skills to get out of ethnic shithole.
Walk around Google campus, 90% of Indians there are STEMmaxxed Dravidian, even though only about 30% of India is dravidian.