Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel "Science" claims that we, as in all of us, are too picky with online dating. And that persistence is key!

BlackOpsIIcel

BlackOpsIIcel

> > > > FAT GIRLS REJECT ME! < < < <
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Posts
3,018
I fucking swear, the bottom 90 % of men are invisible. Read this "science" article. They are open about it too. They only looked and took in to account the cases where girls responded to mens first messages! Right of the start they start ignoring 90 % of men when generalizing for 100 % of men. Then the blue pilled cuck stuff comes in. They tell people to not give up with online dating. Because it is hard for everyone! For that, they include 100 % of men and generalize it for both gender populations.

A massive new study of online dating finds that everyone dates aspirationally—and that a woman’s desirability peaks 32 years before a man’s does.

You’re at a party and you see someone cute across the room. They glance at you, maybe even smile for a second, then carry on with their conversation. You feel the room shrink, your heart rate quicken, your face go red: You’re crushing on this stranger, hard. But then the sensible part of your brain tells you to forget it: That person’s way, way out of your league.

Wait a second, you counter: Do dating “leagues” even exist?

At this point, Elizabeth Bruch, a professor of sociology at the University of Michigan, crashes in to your thought process (and this news article). Yep, she says. Leagues do seem to exist. But you’re not alone in trying to escape yours: “Three-quarters, or more, of people are dating aspirationally,” she says. And according to a new study, users of online-dating sites spend most of their time trying to contact people “out of their league.”


In fact, most online-dating users tend to message people exactly 25 percent more desirable than they are.

Bruch would know. She’s spent the past few years studying how people make decisions and pursue partners on online-dating sites, using exclusive data from the dating sites themselves. “There’s so much folk wisdom about dating and courtship, and very little scientific evidence,” she told me recently. “My research comes out of realizing that with these large-scale data sets, we can shed light on a lot of these old dating aphorisms.”

In the new study, published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances, Bruch and her colleagues analyzed thousands of messages exchanged on a “popular, free online-dating service” between more than 186,000 straight men and women. They looked only at four metro areas—New York, Boston, Chicago, and Seattle—and only at messages from January 2014.

Imagine for a second that you are one of the users whom Bruch and her colleagues studied—in fact, imagine that you are a very desirable user. Your specific desirability rank would have been generated by two figures: whether other desirable people contacted you, and whether other desirable people responded when you contacted them. If you contacted a much less desirable person, their desirability score would rise; if they contacted you and you replied,then your score would fall.

The team had to analyze both first messages and first replies, because, well, men usually make the first move. “A defining feature of heterosexual online dating is that, in the vast majority of cases, it is men who establish the first contact—more than 80 percent of first messages are from men in our data set,” the study says. But “women reply very selectively to the messages they receive from men—their average reply rate is less than 20 percent—so women’s replies … can give us significant insight about who they are interested in.”

The team combined all that data by using the PageRank algorithm, the same software that helps inform Google’s search results. It found that—insofar as dating “leagues” are not different tiers of hotness, but a single ascending hierarchy of desirability—then they do seem to exist in the data. But people do not seem universally locked into them—and they can occasionally find success escaping from theirs.

The key, Bruch said, is that “persistence pays off.”

“Reply rates [to the average message] are between 0 percent and 10 percent,” she told me. Her advice: People should note those extremely low reply rates and send out more greetings.

Michael Rosenfeld, a professor of sociology at Stanford who was not connected to this study, agreed that persistence was a good strategy. “The idea that persistence pays off makes sense to me, as the online-dating world has a wider choice set of potential mates to choose from,” he told me in an email. “The greater choice set pays dividends to people who are willing to be persistent in trying to find a mate.”


Of the study as a whole, he said: “I think its conclusions are robust and its methodologies are sound.”

Yet what also emerges from the data is a far more depressing idea of “leagues” than many joking friends would suppose. Across the four cities and the thousands of users, consistent patterns around age, race, and education level emerge. White men and Asian women are consistently more desired than other users, while black women rank anomalously lower.

Bruch said that race and gender often get mixed up, with a race having gendered connotations. “Asian is coded as female, so that’s why Asian women get so much market power and Asian men get so little,” she told me. “For black men and women, it’s the opposite.”

But “what we are seeing is overwhelmingly the effect of white preferences,” she cautioned. “This is site is predominantly white, 70 percent white. If this was a site that was 20 percent white, we may see a totally different desirability hierarchy.”

“Other people have done research using data from online-dating sites, and found similar racial and gender hierarchies,” said Rosenfeld, the Stanford professor.

And Bruch emphasized that the hierarchy did not just depend on race, age, and education level: Because it is derived from user behavior, it “captures whatever traits people are responding to when they pursue partners. This will include traits like wittiness, genetic factors, or whatever else drives people to message,” she said.

Here are seven other not-entirely-happy takeaways from Bruch’s study:

- In the study, men’s desirability peaks at age 50. But women’s desirability starts high at age 18 and falls throughout their lifespan.
 
I want to ER after reading that
 
Men's desirability peaks at 50? :feelswow: TRP looks borderline rational for saying it peaks at 35...
 
Men's desirability peaks at 50? :feelswow: TRP looks borderline rational for saying it peaks at 35...

They play with the statistics. Probably got to do with older women looking for safety. Since they are in debt and haven't saved for retirement.
 
You need to keep the masses in check cuz
 
The problem is that men and women are in different league. Only Chad is in the same league as women.
 
No the problem is that there’s only a small tiny percentage of men that are totally undesirable and that’s us. Most guys can get off at least a few times and then they end up settling down and getting married. Then there’s the elite group of men who never have problems getting dates period. The ones you refer to as Chads.
 
Cuck Tears "forgot" important parts. Such as playing with statistics.

 
Men's desirability peaks at 50? :feelswow: TRP looks borderline rational for saying it peaks at 35...

Peak doesn't mean anything when it's always low.

If you go from 1 to 1.5 it's a "peak"

Men at 50 have better social status/money and less selective women، it's not the 20 years old that contact them but the old single mothers, landwales etc, that's why they "peak". Without factoring in the type and age of women they attract the "peak" is meaningless.

It would be like a white incel saying that he "peaked at 30" without mentionning that at 30 he went to thailand lol.
 
Peak doesn't mean anything when it's always low.

If you go from 1 to 1.5 it's a "peak"

Men at 50 have better social status/money and less selective women، it's not the 20 years old that contact them but the old single mothers, landwales etc, that's why they "peak". Without factoring in the type and age of women they attract the "peak" is meaningless.

It would be like a white incel saying that he "peaked at 30" without mentionning that at 30 he went to thailand lol.

Yeah, I agree, a guy can "peak" and it's still shit. TRP thinks your looks and status reach a combined peak at 35 and 25 year old women are throwing themselves at you.
 
Peak doesn't mean anything when it's always low.

If you go from 1 to 1.5 it's a "peak"

Men at 50 have better social status/money and less selective women، it's not the 20 years old that contact them but the old single mothers, landwales etc, that's why they "peak". Without factoring in the type and age of women they attract the "peak" is meaningless.

It would be like a white incel saying that he "peaked at 30" without mentionning that at 30 he went to thailand lol.
This. Peaking is just a cope.
 

Similar threads

IncelGolem
Replies
47
Views
3K
The Darkcel
The Darkcel
AngryUbermensch
Replies
15
Views
577
IncelTill.idie
IncelTill.idie
gymletethnicel
Replies
35
Views
1K
Logic55
Logic55

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top