C
cookie33
cavemancel
★
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2019
- Posts
- 19
In particular this comment (I couldn't figure how to link it, but it has about 200 upvotes) is a very potent blackpill that summarizes the recent effects dating apps in turning a greater part of the population into incels:
We are the many.
I remember reading a few articles about this last year, and there's a theory that it mostly has to do with things like Tinder and the like being so commonplace in the dating world now. Basically there's a group of attractive people having sex with each other and leaving the average and ugly folks in the dust because it's so much easier for people to just 'date up'. People aren't settling with just anyone because there's so much opportunities for them to just play the numbers while also being very particular. Meanwhile, the rejected folks are so scarred by the heartbreak and rejection that they are apprehensive about trying to find someone for themselves.
As an ugly person, I can say that I can see how that could be part of the cause. Before online dating and especially Tinder, I could still have a shot with someone simply by being a good person. But the same people that might have once dated someone like me can easily find a dozen plus better looking people at the swipe of their finger. I pretty much don't even bother trying to talk to women now because I know that at any given moment, there are likely several other better men than myself who have already offered their romances.
With such posts appearing on the top of Reddit, it is safe to say that blackpilled beliefs are becoming mainstream. Tinder should not be blamed as the cause of inceldom, but viewed as a blessing: it is the biggest spreader of the blackpill among the young population, turning incels from a minority to a majority. Tinder is not been a surprise and source of disillusionment for truecels, but only for bluepilled normies.
A blackpilled majority would favor, as another comment mentioned, either (and most likely) a disinterest in sex in a great part of the population like in Japan (through copes at first, and then low libido at older ages), or in the other direction, the breakdown of human rights to close down its own loopholes: the attractive minority are validly using human rights and freewill as justification to deprive the majority of the human right to reproduce, genuine love and genuine sex. Is it a human right to deprive others of human rights? This is the first occasion a basic human right truly contradicts itself: it is only a question of logistics to evenly distribute water, food, freedom, and even to some extent, money, but sex?
Hopefully, a regulation of sexual market by a majority of frustrated patriarchs is the first step in destigmatizing once again the violation of human rights, like before the 1700s, and eliminating degeneracy.