Hate_my_life
Genetic Failure - Never began
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2018
- Posts
- 16,087
I was made aware of this study in the thread on reddit where normies begin to realise the dating reality for men. Link to thread.
First of all note that time period when this study was conducted. 1980. At this point female hypergamy wasn't bad, nor were there any dating apps. Men had a better chance of getting laid however NOT A SINGLE WOMAN would sleep with a man.
The important truth lies in the table:
In both cases 0% of women would comply to have sex with men.
Also these weren't ugly men:
They claim the attractiveness has no effect on the result, yet in the next paragraph state that they only both parties selected an attractive other (with women selecting a slightly higher PSL guy than a guy selecting the woman):
What would have happened if they had actually selected very attractive males I wonder....
I thought I'd share this topic as firstly it was shared by a normie on that reddit thread which I find hysterical but it highlights that women's sexual desire towards men can not be matched with man's sexual desire towards women. We see this ever so clearly on tinder with the huge imbalance and in reality. As a result, women shall only go for THE BEST man that approaches her hence why women consider 80% of men to be below average.
[Source](https://www.sciencefriday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gender-differences-in-receptivity-to-sexual-offers.pdf)
In these experiments, conducted in 1978 and 1982, male and Ie- male confederates of average attractiveness 'approached potential partners with one of three requests: "Would you go out tonight'?" "Will you come over to my apartment?" or "Would you go to bed with me?" The great majority of men were willing to have a sexual liaison with the women who approached them. Women were not. Not one woman agreed to a sexual liaison. Many possible reasons for this marked gender difference were discussed.
First of all note that time period when this study was conducted. 1980. At this point female hypergamy wasn't bad, nor were there any dating apps. Men had a better chance of getting laid however NOT A SINGLE WOMAN would sleep with a man.
The important truth lies in the table:
In both cases 0% of women would comply to have sex with men.
Also these weren't ugly men:
The physical attractiveness of both the female afHi male confederates varied from slightly unattractive to moderatel'. attractive.
They claim the attractiveness has no effect on the result, yet in the next paragraph state that they only both parties selected an attractive other (with women selecting a slightly higher PSL guy than a guy selecting the woman):
On a scale of I to 9 (1 = "Very unattractive"; 9 = "Very attractive"), female confederates rated the male subjects M = 7.30. Male confederates rated fe':llale subjects M = 7.70.
What would have happened if they had actually selected very attractive males I wonder....
I thought I'd share this topic as firstly it was shared by a normie on that reddit thread which I find hysterical but it highlights that women's sexual desire towards men can not be matched with man's sexual desire towards women. We see this ever so clearly on tinder with the huge imbalance and in reality. As a result, women shall only go for THE BEST man that approaches her hence why women consider 80% of men to be below average.
[Source](https://www.sciencefriday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gender-differences-in-receptivity-to-sexual-offers.pdf)