Theory The Flower Power Tax: against hypergamy and sexual inequality

[unuser]

New controls on the sexual market afer the de facto fall of monogamy and religious mores [this applied to Western countries initially, but can be considered a world phenomenon with the surge of internet and dating apps], consisting of a toll to promiscuity (Flower Power Tax euphemistically) as percentage of personal income or net worth. In general terms, promiscuous men would pay it for hoarding and women for discriminating when exercising their hypergamy [explain this as 'with polyamory some people have diferent partners and others have none, so those who want to engage in it will pay a tax to compensate those who end up alone']. The tax will help in moderating the issues of growing inequalites in the access to sex, low birth rates, persistent violence and greed in men, growing economic inequalites, obsession with looks, bloated conspicuous consumption, and debt in the long run. Money would be used to compensate monetarily the growing number of incels and to
subsidize decaying motherhood, especially that o baby girls. Long-term goal of reducing the proporton of males in human societes as a way to reduce violence, sexual harassment and the likelihood of armed conflicts (Sexual Singularity).

This is the opening of a thesis written by the economist F. Artigues Cuyàs.

Very interesting and worth the read, I would post it on Must Read if I could.

Reducing the proportion of males may sound weird as it looks like what some radical feminists defend.

However, like I have been saying in replies to multiple threads here, it would in fact be an immense help for men and would take a huge chunk of sexual power out of women's hands. The low amount of males would force women to compete between themselves, greatly hampering their monopoly on the sexual market.

Artigues Cuyàs' work is an invaluable starting point for a structured program of demands by an incel movement.

Artigues Cuyàs' complete thesis:
https://www.academia.edu/44483022/Flower_Power_Tax_Academic_Supports_2020_

 

[Kamikaze]

Ive read everything and it would be utterly surreal if society began addressing the most fundamental social inequality(primordial even).

sadly l do not think we will ever see this acknowledged. Women are the ones that are running the social issues narratives in the world, and acknowledging this issue goes straight against their long established narrative of being the oppressed and discriminated, a lie repeated so many times that they themselves now believe.

Sadly there is no public discourse that can occur on this issue. Any change for men will come either from violent social instability or en masse male withdrawal from the economy(which women will not be able to replace since they never compete for the non glamorous, dangerous and dirty jobs that keep society afloat).