I
This is not an oppression olympics thread, and in no way am I saying that looks or race doesn't matter.
The reason the heightpill is an important proof of the blackpill is because height can be OBJECTIVELY measured.
Can looks be objectively measured? Sure, somewhat. However there are an immense amount of variables that are hard to quantify. Also, even if you can quantify looks down to a science, there will always be the argument that looks are subjective, and that different people like different faces (just LOL at that tbh)
How about race? Again, you're bringing an even larger amount of variables that cannot be objectively measured. Does race matter? Obviously it does, no question. However, being of a certain race does not necessarily guarantee that you will be born attractive or unattractive. You can be born white and still be unattractive, and be born Asian but be 6'3" and have an attractive face.
Also, the racepill falls under the same argument that race preferences are subjective, and they definitely can be. There are Chads in every race.
However, the heightpill is the only one with an easily identifiable metric; the distance from the bottom of your feet to the top of your head.
Because of this, it is VERY easy to create, generate and prove theories that show the difference in quality of life, in life satisfaction, in income and in dating success, between short males and tall males. In fact, almost all blackpill science seems centered on the heightpill, because of how easy it is to back it by science.
Take a look at this photo:
When you ask which one would be more successful with women, most people instinctively know that the taller one is, it's no secret.
Yes, the guy on the left is Asian, but that still proves my point.
See, the race hierarchy seems to correlate almost entirely with height.
In most countries with white people, the average height is 5'10", perhaps higher. Same with SOME Sub-saharan countries where people are taller. Meanwhile, average heights in curry/sandcel countries are between 5'5"-5'7", about the same as the average heights in rice-cel countries. It's not a coincidence that the race preference of women seems to correlate entirely with whichever race seems to have the taller people.
Yes, looks and race matter, but the heightpill is the only one that shows metric proof of how we are right.
The reason the heightpill is an important proof of the blackpill is because height can be OBJECTIVELY measured.
Can looks be objectively measured? Sure, somewhat. However there are an immense amount of variables that are hard to quantify. Also, even if you can quantify looks down to a science, there will always be the argument that looks are subjective, and that different people like different faces (just LOL at that tbh)
How about race? Again, you're bringing an even larger amount of variables that cannot be objectively measured. Does race matter? Obviously it does, no question. However, being of a certain race does not necessarily guarantee that you will be born attractive or unattractive. You can be born white and still be unattractive, and be born Asian but be 6'3" and have an attractive face.
Also, the racepill falls under the same argument that race preferences are subjective, and they definitely can be. There are Chads in every race.
However, the heightpill is the only one with an easily identifiable metric; the distance from the bottom of your feet to the top of your head.
Because of this, it is VERY easy to create, generate and prove theories that show the difference in quality of life, in life satisfaction, in income and in dating success, between short males and tall males. In fact, almost all blackpill science seems centered on the heightpill, because of how easy it is to back it by science.
Take a look at this photo:
When you ask which one would be more successful with women, most people instinctively know that the taller one is, it's no secret.
Yes, the guy on the left is Asian, but that still proves my point.
See, the race hierarchy seems to correlate almost entirely with height.
In most countries with white people, the average height is 5'10", perhaps higher. Same with SOME Sub-saharan countries where people are taller. Meanwhile, average heights in curry/sandcel countries are between 5'5"-5'7", about the same as the average heights in rice-cel countries. It's not a coincidence that the race preference of women seems to correlate entirely with whichever race seems to have the taller people.
Yes, looks and race matter, but the heightpill is the only one that shows metric proof of how we are right.
