Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The logical extension of the black pill.....(you're NOT going to want to hear this)

Ryo_Hazuki

Ryo_Hazuki

Mythic
★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
4,797
I didn't want to put what the logical extension of the black pill is in the title as I don't want to come off as insulting...but what I am about to say is the truth, even though none of you want to accept it. It's a truth that I have realized only recently (last few weeks).

Warning: The dosage of this black pill is not fit for human consumption, may be fatal.

First, let's start with a basic black pill fact:

1) When it comes to a partner, women only care about things that have pragmatic value, which is mainly looks and money*

This is nothing more than blackpill 101.....moving on.

2) A man's affection and commitment, has absolutely zero intrinsic value to women. By themselves they are worthless to women.

3) A woman's affection and commitment has a lot of value to men.

4) Incels, generally speaking, lack looks, money or anything else that could have pragmatic value to women.

5) Incels desire a woman's affection and commitment.

Therefore...

6) Incels want something from women despite not having anything of value to women

7) Someone who seeks to get something from someone but has nothing of value to offer the other person, is a parasite.

8) Therefore, the logical extension of the black pill is that we are all parasites (or in the very least, wannabe parasites).

If anyone sees any flaws in this logic, feel free to point them out. But from what I can tell, this is rock solid.


*Yes, yes...women are attracted to men with good looks but are not attracted to men with money and just want them as betabux...but this doesn't change the conclusion at all.
 
Discordcels saw it first
 
I am valuable. If I get more money than her and we are in a serious relationship and on the verge of marriage I will be valuable because I will have to take up more responsibilities. It isnt betabuxx. Its you taking leadership and being the man of the house in that situation.
 
High iq tbh. It makes sense. I don't know what else to say tbh. I don't even care anymore.
 
7) Someone who seeks to get something from someone but has nothing of value to offer the other person, is a parasite.
and the logical conclusion of this will be incel concentration camps, parasites by their very nature are unwanted and despised
 
Shit...
This pretty much explains why normies hate us. Brutal post. I guess normies are right about us being entitled, just in a different sense.
 
I am valuable. If I get more money than her and we are in a serious relationship and on the verge of marriage I will be valuable because I will have to take up more responsibilities. It isnt betabuxx. Its you taking leadership and being the man of the house in that situation.
Tbh.
 
The problem is how exigent women are with looks. I'm a 4/10, so I have that to offer, and I'd be willing to accept a 4/10 girl, but one like that doesn't want me.
 
I mean, we can survive with our own bodies. Not entirely parasitical. But I see the point.
 
I didn't want to put what the logical extension of the black pill is in the title as I don't want to come off as insulting...but what I am about to say is the truth, even though none of you want to accept it. It's a truth that I have realized only recently (last few weeks).

Warning: The dosage of this black pill is not fit for human consumption, may be fatal.

First, let's start with a basic black pill fact:

1) When it comes to a partner, women only care about things that have pragmatic value, which is mainly looks and money*

This is nothing more than blackpill 101.....moving on.

2) A man's affection and commitment, has absolutely zero intrinsic value to women. By themselves they are worthless to women.

3) A woman's affection and commitment has a lot of value to men.

4) Incels, generally speaking, lack looks, money or anything else that could have pragmatic value to women.

5) Incels desire a woman's affection and commitment.

Therefore...

6) Incels want something from women despite not having anything of value to women

7) Someone who seeks to get something from someone but has nothing of value to offer the other person, is a parasite.

8) Therefore, the logical extension of the black pill is that we are all parasites (or in the very least, wannabe parasites).

If anyone sees any flaws in this logic, feel free to point them out. But from what I can tell, this is rock solid.


*Yes, yes...women are attracted to men with good looks but are not attracted to men with money and just want them as betabux...but this doesn't change the conclusion at all.
water is wet to be honest
 
6) Incels want something from women despite not having anything of value to women
The problem is, of course, that I can't really control the fact that I want a woman. If it were up to me, I'd never think about them again and I'd be at peace. Not to mention the obvious, that most of my obstacles to this weren't even created by me.

I resent the fact that my brain makes me feel loneliness more than I hate women for not wanting me tbh.
The problem is how exigent women are with looks. I'm a 4/10, so I have that to offer, and I'd be willing to accept a 4/10 girl, but one like that doesn't want me.
This as well.
 
Incels contribute to society though (At least if you're not a NEET), I also take issue with the idea of "looks" being a pragmatic value.
Roasties are not so logical and pragmatic, most of their preferences are shallow, attempting to justify their mating behavior as such is retarded.
 
I mean, we can survive with our own bodies. Not entirely parasitical. But I see the point.

1549649246141


It's a beautiful day outside. birds are singing, flowers are blooming... on days like these, incels like you. ...SHOULD BE ROTTING
 
1549361604095

Woman's logic 101.
 
Women are pragmatic. Men are the poets and romantics of the world.
 
We’re parasites if we want things that we cannot afford, because the social contract of western societies now is privileging women and putting women’s needs on a pedestal.

I’d say that for me the thing is like that: I want sex, I pay escorts and I pretend they give me sex if they accept to take my money.

Since all women are whores and there’s no difference between a civilian whore and the escort I have to pay for sex, then I want a clear deal. So, If I decide to be a betabux, then I don’t want to be divorce raped because of stupid feminist laws.

I’m not a parasite, because I’m offering only what is valuable to women: money. If a woman want my money, she have to respect her part of the the deal.

Since bullshits like “love” and “validation” are nonexistent concepts fostered by mentally ill incels, clearly the only value women have is the sex they are able to provide. And I refuse the worldview of cucked reddit users where you have to be a provider and a cuck accepting to be submissive towards foids.

If you pay, you have the right to pretend to have what you payed for.
 
That's nothing. I saw a very attractive jb today and was stunned. A few seconds later I realized: Holy shit, Chad has fucked her and ejaculated in her mouth
 
Basically correct I guess, except I would say:

1) Status should be added to looks and money.
2) This definition of incels would have to exclude those who can and would betabux. Very few incels can ever become chad or Chadlite, but a larger proportion can eventually buxx especially if willing to date outside their race / nationality.
3) In complex, individualistic Western societies, incel men, unless NEET, prop up welfare states from which women benefit. If another major armed conflict broke out, incels might additionally serve as cannon fodder. By means like that they can become useful on a societal scale.
4) Increasingly, as social media makes them a-list celebrities in their own little world, women seem to desire orbiters and other hangers merely for the validation they provide, even if these men are not judged worthy of sex or relationships.
 
great point if our money wasn't being taken away a gunpoint and given to foids
 
I didn't want to put what the logical extension of the black pill is in the title as I don't want to come off as insulting...but what I am about to say is the truth, even though none of you want to accept it. It's a truth that I have realized only recently (last few weeks).

Warning: The dosage of this black pill is not fit for human consumption, may be fatal.

First, let's start with a basic black pill fact:

1) When it comes to a partner, women only care about things that have pragmatic value, which is mainly looks and money*

This is nothing more than blackpill 101.....moving on.

2) A man's affection and commitment, has absolutely zero intrinsic value to women. By themselves they are worthless to women.

3) A woman's affection and commitment has a lot of value to men.

4) Incels, generally speaking, lack looks, money or anything else that could have pragmatic value to women.

5) Incels desire a woman's affection and commitment.

Therefore...

6) Incels want something from women despite not having anything of value to women

7) Someone who seeks to get something from someone but has nothing of value to offer the other person, is a parasite.

8) Therefore, the logical extension of the black pill is that we are all parasites (or in the very least, wannabe parasites).

If anyone sees any flaws in this logic, feel free to point them out. But from what I can tell, this is rock solid.


*Yes, yes...women are attracted to men with good looks but are not attracted to men with money and just want them as betabux...but this doesn't change the conclusion at all.
Not me, sorry, boss.
This is how femoids think, and if you confront their dumbass mode of thinking then(to them) you're comfirming you have a bad personality.
The kafkatrapping meme gender.
 
Last edited:
and the logical conclusion of this will be incel concentration camps, parasites by their very nature are unwanted and despised

It's here. They're called "John schools" where Landwhale leftist lesbians talk about patriarchy & the evils of white or just heterosexual males & their desires backed up by white knight cuck :soy: boy catamite cucks.


Agreed bro.


Unfortunately yes.

The belief that looks correlate with being good or moral is very recurrent in history, @Fontaine made some great posts about it.


100% accurate.

Halo Effect. 101.
great point if our money wasn't being taken away a gunpoint and given to foids

Incels contribute to society though (At least if you're not a NEET), I also take issue with the idea of "looks" being a pragmatic value.
Roasties are not so logical and pragmatic, most of their preferences are shallow, attempting to justify their mating behavior as such is retarded.

Agreed to both.
 
Last edited:
Don't agree.

Men support society, society enables women to survive, ergo women are the parasites.

Of course it's not that simple.

Life on earth is inherently symbiotic, you needed a woman to be born, and a different woman needed you later to survive, it's sort of like you're paying it forward.

Of course then the actual value of "birth" comes into question ie antinatalism, but generally speaking in a NORMAL/HEALTHY society, everybody can have a family.

Just because the govt or higher-ups have made this illegal doesn't make "humanity" at fault, it makes the govt and higher-ups at fault.
 
Massive ropepill tbh.

But well thought out and accurate
 
6) Incels want something from women despite not having anything of value to women
the flaw is that you didn't consider that we live in a society.
the day in which women will be completely independent from men hard work your argument will be correct.
 
i am not a parasite

so fuck off
 
7) Someone who seeks to get something from someone but has nothing of value to offer the other person, is a parasite.

why are you using womens judgement of value instead of some other metric of value?

Because
8) Therefore, the logical extension of the black pill is that we are all parasites (or in the very least, wannabe parasites).

yea then you judge incels by womens natural value system, to essentially insult incels

Could be that incels have things that would benefit women, that women dont think would benefit them
In other words, women are wrong about what makes them happy or useful to society, rather than incels being bad for not meeting womens natural value system
 
Last edited:
I'm a subhuman. The only way I can get one-sided sex is to either pay for it or get it by force both of which I don't want to do.
I'm unable to have genuine unpaid for consensual sex.
This is all that matters. No other blackpills needed. I'm already fully blackpilled.
 
I'm a subhuman..

NO. And this is why I pushed against this thread in the first place. Not meeting womens natural sexual desires does NOT make one subhuman (or a parasite or whatever). Thats a line given by feminists and far-right-wingers who think all incels should sui

Natural female sexuality is not a rational sorting mechanism for good genetic traits.
The evolutionary desires of women do NOT decide what is genetically inferior or superior. That is a non-sensical far-right-wing trad-con line, that assumes past evolutionary adaptations are some sort of rule book for the future.

All species die out, sometimes DUE to the females evolutionary desires. Also, our society went through a major shift during the industrial revolution that made a lot of our evolutionary impulses arguably actively harmful to the future of the human species.
 
Last edited:
You are absolutely correct.
 
NO. And this is why I pushed against this thread in the first place. Not meeting womens natural sexual desires does NOT make one subhuman. Thats a line given by feminists and far-right-wingers who think all incels should sui
Dogs all over the world have sex with human females. Think about that.
I'm not human, I'm below dogs.
 
Dogs all over the world have sex with human females. Think about that.
I'm not human, I'm below dogs.

Below in what sense? Why are you using the natural desires of women as a judgement on how good your genes are for propagating the species?
 
Women started parasiting on us first when they were allowed to vote and use up most of our taxes. We should have government funded hookers and sexbots to equal the playing field.
 
Why are you using the natural desires of women as a judgement on how good your genes are for propagating the species?
Because when you remove all the cope and muh iq bullshit you realize that it's all that matters. All of my good qualities will never make a difference. I'm good at music, drawing and other meaningless shit, but I'll never have children and my family name dies with me. It's how nature is and it's not just humans. All animals work the same way.
Trash gets filtered and I'm the trash. Women are dumb fucking cunts, but it's millions of years of evolution and it has no mercy.
 
Don't agree.

Men support society, society enables women to survive, ergo women are the parasites.

Of course it's not that simple.

Life on earth is inherently symbiotic, you needed a woman to be born, and a different woman needed you later to survive, it's sort of like you're paying it forward.

Of course then the actual value of "birth" comes into question ie antinatalism, but generally speaking in a NORMAL/HEALTHY society, everybody can have a family.

Just because the govt or higher-ups have made this illegal doesn't make "humanity" at fault, it makes the govt and higher-ups at fault.

True. Men are parasitic in terms of sexual transactions, but women are parasitic when it comes to resources and wealth. At least for now. Until men are replaced by the state.
 
Last edited:
Because when you remove all the cope and muh iq bullshit you realize that it's all that matters. All of my good qualities will never make a difference. I'm good at music, drawing and other meaningless shit, but I'll never have children and my family name dies with me. It's how nature is and it's not just humans. All animals work the same way.
Trash gets filtered and I'm the trash. Women are dumb fucking cunts, but it's millions of years of evolution and it has no mercy.

Well perhaps you are an asset being disposed of like trash. If not you, then the incel reading this.

I dont tolerate incels calling other incels trash but if you call yourself that then ok, but I hope you realize you might be wrong. Your good qualities being meaningless to women does not make you fundamentally inferior.
 
Meanwhile jobless single moms want a rich betabux cuck while she fucks tyrone and chad while hes at work, fuck this logic and fuck this gay earth everything needs to burn.
 
The problem is how exigent women are with looks. I'm a 4/10, so I have that to offer, and I'd be willing to accept a 4/10 girl, but one like that doesn't want me.
In order to get a girlfriend in 2019 you have to mog her in all areas. So as a man, you have no chance with your looksmatch.
 
I dont tolerate incels calling other incels trash but if you call yourself that then ok, but I hope you realize you might be wrong. Your good qualities being meaningless to women does not make you fundamentally inferior.
They're only meaningless to stuck up western whores who have everything handed to them by the state. If he goes to SEasia the foids there will give him an extra 2-3 smv points.
 
Point #7 your definition of parasite is the issue, a parasite does not seek to get something when it has nothing to offer, but actually does get something while actively harming the party it benefits from without offering anything in return. Based on your example an ugly and poor incel that does manage to get a loyal female but abuses her to keep her in line would fit the label of parasite.
 
Last edited:
and the logical conclusion of this will be incel concentration camps, parasites by their very nature are unwanted and despised
We should flip it and reach a consensus to have the world's governments seperate the two genders or something.
 
Yes, we are parasites and that is a logical conclusion.

However, females are just as parasitic with their attempts to trap males as betabux once their value has begun slipping.
 
I read a post on braincels recently which referred to all men as parasitic because men impregnate women who then need to take care of the children. This is true enough in polygamous societies where men have zero paternal investment, but in modern societies, women are the parasites who siphon wealth and resources away from men, especially through childbirth.

I would say that something similar applies to looks/physical attraction. Sub-8 men aren't parasites; women on the cock carousal are the parasites for going after men above their league and expecting commitment from them instead of cultivating a mutual relationship with their looksmatch.
 
Last edited:
Over for parasitecels
 
We’re parasites if we want things that we cannot afford, because the social contract of western societies now is privileging women and putting women’s needs on a pedestal.

Exactly this. While I see that from a logical standpoint we could be classified as parasites, the fact is this classification derives from a complete subversion of the social contract. Without a central authority enforcing the (gynocentric) law, possibly under the implicit threat of weapons for the transgressor, we see that femoid actually do parasite men. We can appreciate that in the television realities a la "men vs women" set up on an island in the ocean.

I also noticed that femoids have been made more and more expensive over time and crappier in quality, like a commercial scam. I wonder for how long the speculation bubble on pussy price will go on, honestly...
 

Similar threads

IncelCream
Replies
29
Views
459
Confessor
Confessor
ItsovERfucks
Replies
18
Views
718
InceldianWarrior
InceldianWarrior
ItsovERfucks
Replies
10
Views
526
screwthefbi
screwthefbi
Incline
Replies
8
Views
322
Narcicel's Oneitis
Narcicel's Oneitis

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top