This post was inspired from one of @SlayerSlayer ‘s posts where he explores the use of JBW through sitcoms, it dives into how liberalism is actually just a far more efficient way of purporting JBW because it possesses the duality of acting like holy creatures that care about shitskin ethnics whilst making JBW seem law at the same time, afterall it makes sense, promoting your views through masquerading it by any means necessary and using a shielded approach is far more efficient than outwardly going in there and promoting your beliefs out in brute force. Check it out here -
https://incels.is/threads/do-white-supremacists-watch-romcoms.572511/
Now onto the matter of this post. This film is relevant to discuss because it is the 3rd largest film ever grossed adjusting for inflation and the most popular movie amongst foids. But WHY do foids love it so much? Is it because it promotes themes of feminism such as rebellion and freedom which foids desire, or is it simply Chad worship as we are far more familiar with here. If you have been here long enough, the latter is of course the main reason but it is far more specific than simple Chad worship.
There is something more subtle and not so obvious here, the REAL meaning behind this movie is that JBW always has a higher probability of winning at the end. Think about it for a moment.
Why in the world would some rich foid abandon the richer, taller and better looking husband for someone who is poor and gets facemogged by him? This would make sense IF JBW wasn’t real and the film was universally hated by foids. JBW is the only variable Leonardo Di Caprio has over the Chad plus the film was not hated by any means, it gained popularity all across the globe, not only the Western World. The Chad/Chadlite in question here -
So what's going on here? The truth is, the Chad she is engaged to looks like an ethnic and thats why he lost to Leonardo Di Caprio, I’ve seen more sandniggers that look the Chad than Europeans. I’m not going to argue about genetics and the likes here because only the application of the real world matters when it comes to topics like this. Anyways what is happening in this film is that she replaces her Chad husband and cheats on him with a poor, worse looking blond hair blue eyed Leonardo Di Caprio. The only difference, the only upper hand Leonardo has on the Chad is that he is WHITER so it must've been the sole reason she decided to cheat on him, there is no other variable where he has an edge or another possibility on why it happened unless the deniers can point it out to me.
Clearly as you can see here the Chad facemogs Leonardo and is taller than him.
Foids love this movie because it is promoting JBW, whether they subconsciously know it or not, they love seeing the ethnic Chad getting cucked by some poor bum. In their eyes he is less worthy due to not being as white as Leonardo Di Caprio. Otherwise it makes logical sense for foids to hate this movie because which foid would want to see a taller, richer and better looking guy get cucked? But they don’t hate it because the whiteness of Leonardo Di Caprio was enough to be more worthy to foids than ALL of the Chad’s traits.
Furthermore, there is not a single nigger in the entire movie, there were some Arabs towards the end that appeared for 2 seconds but that’s it. Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing to blame for this as it's historically accurate that almost everyone who went aboard the Titanic was White. But they seriously tried to keep this as accurate as possible for a reason, unlike other films released in similar times that tried to put a Black or Chinese actor even if it were to be in the background shots. They made this film in a way so it could be visually appealing as possible to the target audience (foids), this way the producers can maximise the target audience’s enjoyment of the film and that means don’t put any ethnics. Even adding one or two ethnics for a couple of minutes into the film would subconsciously put the rating down, especially as it's on the romance genre.
This entire film is a JBW recount and promotion, this is the true reason why foids all across the globe enjoy this piece and got it to the 3rd most grossing film of all time, their enjoyment of the story serves as evidence of JBW.
https://incels.is/threads/do-white-supremacists-watch-romcoms.572511/
Now onto the matter of this post. This film is relevant to discuss because it is the 3rd largest film ever grossed adjusting for inflation and the most popular movie amongst foids. But WHY do foids love it so much? Is it because it promotes themes of feminism such as rebellion and freedom which foids desire, or is it simply Chad worship as we are far more familiar with here. If you have been here long enough, the latter is of course the main reason but it is far more specific than simple Chad worship.
There is something more subtle and not so obvious here, the REAL meaning behind this movie is that JBW always has a higher probability of winning at the end. Think about it for a moment.
Why in the world would some rich foid abandon the richer, taller and better looking husband for someone who is poor and gets facemogged by him? This would make sense IF JBW wasn’t real and the film was universally hated by foids. JBW is the only variable Leonardo Di Caprio has over the Chad plus the film was not hated by any means, it gained popularity all across the globe, not only the Western World. The Chad/Chadlite in question here -
So what's going on here? The truth is, the Chad she is engaged to looks like an ethnic and thats why he lost to Leonardo Di Caprio, I’ve seen more sandniggers that look the Chad than Europeans. I’m not going to argue about genetics and the likes here because only the application of the real world matters when it comes to topics like this. Anyways what is happening in this film is that she replaces her Chad husband and cheats on him with a poor, worse looking blond hair blue eyed Leonardo Di Caprio. The only difference, the only upper hand Leonardo has on the Chad is that he is WHITER so it must've been the sole reason she decided to cheat on him, there is no other variable where he has an edge or another possibility on why it happened unless the deniers can point it out to me.
Clearly as you can see here the Chad facemogs Leonardo and is taller than him.
Foids love this movie because it is promoting JBW, whether they subconsciously know it or not, they love seeing the ethnic Chad getting cucked by some poor bum. In their eyes he is less worthy due to not being as white as Leonardo Di Caprio. Otherwise it makes logical sense for foids to hate this movie because which foid would want to see a taller, richer and better looking guy get cucked? But they don’t hate it because the whiteness of Leonardo Di Caprio was enough to be more worthy to foids than ALL of the Chad’s traits.
Furthermore, there is not a single nigger in the entire movie, there were some Arabs towards the end that appeared for 2 seconds but that’s it. Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing to blame for this as it's historically accurate that almost everyone who went aboard the Titanic was White. But they seriously tried to keep this as accurate as possible for a reason, unlike other films released in similar times that tried to put a Black or Chinese actor even if it were to be in the background shots. They made this film in a way so it could be visually appealing as possible to the target audience (foids), this way the producers can maximise the target audience’s enjoyment of the film and that means don’t put any ethnics. Even adding one or two ethnics for a couple of minutes into the film would subconsciously put the rating down, especially as it's on the romance genre.
This entire film is a JBW recount and promotion, this is the true reason why foids all across the globe enjoy this piece and got it to the 3rd most grossing film of all time, their enjoyment of the story serves as evidence of JBW.
