Gonna need an actual link and source for your studies so I can read them myself, because not only did
@verybasedindeed try this shit with me in another thread, only for all of his studies prove HIM wrong, but I have one RIGHT HERE that explicity affirms that Ashkenazis are overwhelmingly NE European, whiter than Italians/Greeks, and that Italians are closer to Palestinains than Ashkenazi Jews are.
>According to the autosomal polymorphisms the investigated Jewish populations do not share a common origin, and Eastern European Jews are closer to Italians in particular and to Europeans in general than to the other Jewish populations.
Keep in mind, here when they say "other Jewish populations", they basically mean Sephardic (brown) Jews. So this is basically outright confirmation that Ashkenazi/Eastern European Jews are closer to Italians and Europeans than to MENA Jews.
>The close genetic resemblance to Italians accords with the historical presumption that Ashkenazi Jews started their migrations across Europe in Italy and with historical evidence that conversion to Judaism was common in ancient Rome.
>Ashkenazi Jews are not at all close to the Adygei population, and similarly to what is seen in table table1,1, their smallest distance is to Italians and then to Greeks.
>Unlike the assertion of Need et al. [51] on the midway position, and again similarly to what is seen in table table1,1, Italians and Greeks are closer to the Middle Eastern populations than Ashkenazi Jews.
>North Italians (Bergamo and Tuscany) are a little closer to the (Sephradic) Jewish and Middle Eastern populations than Ashkenazi Jews.
>The Italians from Tuscany in Behar et al. [54] are also closer to the (Sephardic) Jewish and Middle Eastern populations than Ashkenazi Jews.
>When one compares the autosomal distances of Eastern European Jews (current study) or Ashkenazi Jews (in Atzmon et al. [53] and Behar et al. [54]) from the Jewish populations that were investigated in the current study, Iraqi, Iranian, Moroccan, Yemenite and Ethiopian Jews, one finds perfect agreement.
The study outright says Ashkenazis are closer to Europeans than they are to Iraqi, Iranian, Morccan, Yemenite Jews in THREE studies
"EEJ or Ashkenazi Jews are much closer to non-Jewish Europeans than to these Jewish populations in all three studies."
Also, I dont know why I need to say this, but anyone with fucking eyes can see that Ashkenazis very clearly have NE European features
Because a German or Pole is obviously fucking whiter than a Greek or Italian who has increased levels of Natufian, Iberomarusian, and even Iranian Neolithic Farmer DNA. There are studies that show that the Italian Peninsula has seen an increase in MENA dna since Roman times, let alone during the Arab expansion
Example:
In the last four centuries BCE, we identify a higher proportion than in the previous four centuries of individuals carrying nonlocal genetic ancestries, which show the greatest affinities to the Near East and northern Africa.
In addition, three individuals were found to carry recent genetic influences from Africa and the Near East, a further demonstration of Rome’s wide connections across the Mediterranean as far back as the Iron Age. Unexpectedly, almost all individuals from the later, Imperial period in the vicinity of the Empire’s capital carried large proportions of eastern Mediterranean ancestry
This suggests that this R1b Y-chromosome lineage spread into the Italian peninsula with steppe-related movements during the Bronze Age. In the first millennium CE, its frequency is reduced to ~40% with higher occurrence of Near Eastern–associated Y-chromosome lineages such as J
n central Italy, including around Rome itself (17), the incoming ancestry detected so far mainly originated from the Near East rather than other areas of the Empire. The genetic replacement of ~50% of the preceding Etruscan-related gene pool was likely influenced by the movement of slaves and possibly soldiers, along with a larger pattern of human mobility from the eastern Mediterranean toward Italy