Wettinghose
Major
★★★
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2018
- Posts
- 2,257
Its even coming to thrid world countries that teenagers are taught about sexual prcatices and protection etc.
It’s only bad if the state pays for it, but there is also the other side of the coin, that less single mothers means more incels, because their standards are very lowprobably not a bad thing if it reduces the number of single moms and their cumspawns ngl.
The entire school system is built around women. After realizing this, you can easily fit in the rest of this puzzle.
It was never to benefit men, thats for sure.
Do you have sex ED in your school? When I was a teen, we only had one presentation about STDsFor women to not have consequences when they fuck with chad, it’s not like school system cares for non chad boys
Because those guys who would date them would turn into incels, that’s why I said that this would mean more incels in first placewats the point of having single moms with supposely low standards... they still wouldnt date incels, plenty of normies would date them these days if anything it reduces the dating pool of foids for incels since incels are much more resistant to the idea of sustaining a single mom and her kids.
Yes, but only three times, they were mostly about preservatives and sexual organsDo you have sex ED in your school? When I was a teen, we only had one presentation about STDs
It's not meant for them. It's meant for foids and normies and chads that are having sex. The life experience of foids and chads is taken as the standard that every other male is expected to meet.Its even coming to thrid world countries that teenagers are taught about sexual prcatices and protection etc.
It's not meant for them. It's meant for foids and normies and chads that are having sex. The life experience of foids and chads is taken as the standard that every other male is expected to meet.