AsiaCel
卐Mongoloid National SocialistϟϟTKD TTD▐┛
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2017
- Posts
- 18,723
Anyone who's autistic about military weapons?
Like tanks, jets, helicopters, ships and etc
Like tanks, jets, helicopters, ships and etc
Abrams is good if you got good infrastructure and can afford running it (very expensive)What do you think about Abrams? Why America does not produce new model tank?
if it works - dont touch it doctrine)Abrams is good if you got good infrastructure and can afford running it (very expensive)
Ammo (M829A4) and armor is first rate according to CIA documents.
Anyway, America is making new tanks, but I don't think they'll be as heavy as the Abrams, as heavier tanks are just not worth it.
pretty much. ballistics are more complicated than what video games showsif it works - dont touch it doctrine)
I got an interesting (in my opinion) subject to discuss. You, no doubt, played some shooter games on pc/mobile, havent you?
Why is guns over there got scaling damage!!!! This is bullshit, you cant do more damage with an AK instead of M4 - you are going to die either way, if bullet hits your vital organs
What do you think about this? Do comparable guns irl deliver different amount of damage to human body? By comparable, i mean AK vs M4, for example
Isnt battlefield work like that? If you got shot - you are done for, you cant fight now, and you must retreatpretty much. ballistics are more complicated than what video games shows
5.56 rounds can range from fragmenting inside the body (extra damage) to simply going through (limited damage) depending on type of ammo.
If you want more guaranteed kills, you'd pick anything above a 7.62 (hence sniper rifles are chambered in them)
I think the more important point is about penetration of body armor rather than "damage" which isn't like in video games. Hence, FMJ ammo are pretty much standard