Atavistic Autist
Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
- Posts
- 9,338
A common excuse that roasties will give for dumping incels into the dustbin of genetic history is that we have "no personaliteehees." Otherwise they will say that we should get "better personaliteehees."
What they are doing here, of course, is revealing a personality preference for psychopathic and extroverted men at the expense of neurotic and introverted men; they basically dehumanize the latter group in preparation for genocide and either imply that they do not exist ("you have no personaliteehee") or are inadequate/subhuman ("get a better personaliteehee").
We all know that the reason for this is that psychopathic and extroverted men tend to enjoy a higher social status and better appearance than neurotic and introverted men.
And the concept for all this is to be found in the term "personage" :
When roasties critique male personality, what they're really doing is critiquing male personage (or lack thereof), and thus appearance and size/stature and how it relates to their social status.
I remember that when I was in high school and used to write essays, I would never use the term personality, but rather personage, because even in adolescence my autistic brain understood that when normies/roasties use the term "personality," they are merely employing it as a euphemism for hierarchical status.
What they are doing here, of course, is revealing a personality preference for psychopathic and extroverted men at the expense of neurotic and introverted men; they basically dehumanize the latter group in preparation for genocide and either imply that they do not exist ("you have no personaliteehee") or are inadequate/subhuman ("get a better personaliteehee").
We all know that the reason for this is that psychopathic and extroverted men tend to enjoy a higher social status and better appearance than neurotic and introverted men.
And the concept for all this is to be found in the term "personage" :
When roasties critique male personality, what they're really doing is critiquing male personage (or lack thereof), and thus appearance and size/stature and how it relates to their social status.
I remember that when I was in high school and used to write essays, I would never use the term personality, but rather personage, because even in adolescence my autistic brain understood that when normies/roasties use the term "personality," they are merely employing it as a euphemism for hierarchical status.
Last edited: