Blackpill Cross-country evidence on the wage of people with above and below-average looks

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

Does it pay to be beautiful?

Physically attractive people can earn more, particularly in customer-facing jobs, and the rewards for men are higher than for women

wol.iza.org

Jfl. Every single time women get reminded of how much they benefit from their gender, the number one retort is that they are just seen as sex objects and that's horrible and men can never understand it and bla bla bla. Yet, despite supposedly not being always seen as "just a sex object", when it comes to one of the most important things in a person's life, how much money they earn, men are penalized harder than women.

Just look at those graphs above lmao. When it comes to good-looking people being paid more, there are countries where women profit so much more than men from that, that the study didn't notice any men profitting from this (they almost certainly are as well, it just didn't find them.) Specifically, in Brazil, Czech Republic and at least some parts of China (well, at least Shanghai), Stacies are happily profitting from their good looks getting them extra money while their Chad counterparts seemingly don't get anything, because even Chad's power can't compete with a Stacy's there. In China in general, unlike just Shanghai, both good-looking men and women have a wage premium, Germany has Stacies getting more than Chads, Luxembourg has Stacies getting more than Chads as well and actually has Chads punished for their looks and earning less because of that. Meanwhile, North American countries, Canada and the US, are the only ones where Chads have higher bonuses to their wages than Stacies.

Now look at the graph with wage hits unattractive people suffer. In Australia, despite supposedly not being seen as just a sex object and actually being seen as people or whatever, it seems to be only the unattractive men that suffer a large hit to their earnings due to being ugly. In the Czech Republic, in contrast to seemingly only Stacies profitting from their good looks, both unattractive men and women are penalized for their bad looks, but incels are hit harder than fem"cels", despite the latter supposedly being the ones who should be hated for not adhering to "societal standards for women." In China as a whole, just like all attractive people have a wage premium, so do all unattractive people get a wage penalty. In the UK and North America as a whole, there's a bigger wage penalty for unattractive men than women, while another source for the US alone has both incels and fem"cels" suffering equally for their shit looks.

Men "aren't seen just for their looks" holes say, yet when it comes to wage discrimination, something that had been one of their prime talking points despite the "gender pay gap" being completely refuted so many times over and over and over and over and over and over again that it's just sad at this point, it is the men that are clearly hit harder. And yet, women say that they are the ones suffering due to how society focuses on their looks.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/16yt62a/it_seems_like_men_fail_to_understand_that_the/




And that's not even talking about the fact that not only are better-looking people paid better in their jobs, they also naturally cluster in better-paid jobs in general, meaning that there's multiple self-supportinglayers to their economic priviledges.

Share of employees reported as having very good looks by occupation in Germany

Just looked for some fresh, 2022 and 2023 studies/articles on the importance of physical attractiveness, and found this graph in one of them:fuk:. Tfw people desperately try to convince each other that beauty is subjective when there's a clear relationship between being attractive and being in a...

incels.is

Tagging some high-IQ brocels who might be interested or participated in the above thread @Epedaphic @OutcompetedByRoomba @Copexodius Maximus @CopeHarderNow @lifefuel @NorthernWind @Robb97 @Celius @kointo @cvh1991

 

[Glerforpus]

The traditional normie response is that “life isn’t fair”. Fuck this earth.
Also lmao at that foid “ how is being desired a privilege?!!!”

 

[lifefuel]

I learned this first hand from interviewing for countless jobs and never getting a single call back when a female interviewer was present.

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

female interviewer

Oh.

 

[BornToLose]

Top-notch research, lad.

 

[Epedaphic]

I will begin reading this now.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

Tagging some high-IQ brocels who might be interested or participated in the above thread

I would be interested in participating, but I neither have the creators location nor am I in control of any nuclear warheads

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

maybe tomorrow when I feel awake enough to think again I try telling that person to hang herself in reddit friendly terms

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

I would be interested in participating, but I neither have the creators location nor am I in control of any nuclear warheads

maybe tomorrow when I feel awake enough to think again I try telling that person to hang herself in reddit friendly terms

Perfectly understandable, have a comfy sleep brocel.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

The traditional normie response is that “life isn’t fair”. Fuck this earth.
Also lmao at that foid “ how is being desired a privilege?!!!”

But when it comes to women being fucked over in any way “ThIs iS wHy We nEeD fEmInIsM” or “bUrN tHe SyStEm”

Does it pay to be beautiful?

Physically attractive people can earn more, particularly in customer-facing jobs, and the rewards for men are higher than for women

wol.iza.org

Jfl. Every single time women get reminded of how much they benefit from their gender, the number one retort is that they are just seen as sex objects and that's horrible and men can never understand it and bla bla bla. Yet, despite supposedly not being always seen as "just a sex object", when it comes to one of the most important things in a person's life, how much money they earn, men are penalized harder than women.

Just look at those graphs above lmao. When it comes to good-looking people being paid more, there are countries where women profit so much more than men from that, that the study didn't notice any men profitting from this (they almost certainly are as well, it just didn't find them.) Specifically, in Brazil, Czech Republic and at least some parts of China (well, at least Shanghai), Stacies are happily profitting from their good looks getting them extra money while their Chad counterparts seemingly don't get anything, because even Chad's power can't compete with a Stacy's there. In China in general, unlike just Shanghai, both good-looking men and women have a wage premium, Germany has Stacies getting more than Chads, Luxembourg has Stacies getting more than Chads as well and actually has Chads punished for their looks and earning less because of that. Meanwhile, North American countries, Canada and the US, are the only ones where Chads have higher bonuses to their wages than Stacies.

Now look at the graph with wage hits unattractive people suffer. In Australia, despite supposedly not being seen as just a sex object and actually being seen as people or whatever, it seems to be only the unattractive men that suffer a large hit to their earnings due to being ugly. In the Czech Republic, in contrast to seemingly only Stacies profitting from their good looks, both unattractive men and women are penalized for their bad looks, but incels are hit harder than fem"cels", despite the latter supposedly being the ones who should be hated for not adhering to "societal standards for women." In China as a whole, just like all attractive people have a wage premium, so do all unattractive people get a wage penalty. In the UK and North America as a whole, there's a bigger wage penalty for unattractive men than women, while another source for the US alone has both incels and fem"cels" suffering equally for their shit looks.

Men "aren't seen just for their looks" holes say, yet when it comes to wage discrimination, something that had been one of their prime talking points despite the "gender pay gap" being completely refuted so many times over and over and over and over and over and over again that it's just sad at this point, it is the men that are clearly hit harder. And yet, women say that they are the ones suffering due to how society focuses on their looks.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/16yt62a/it_seems_like_men_fail_to_understand_that_the/




And that's not even talking about the fact that not only are better-looking people paid better in their jobs, they also naturally cluster in better-paid jobs in general, meaning that there's multiple self-supportinglayers to their economic priviledges.

Share of employees reported as having very good looks by occupation in Germany

Just looked for some fresh, 2022 and 2023 studies/articles on the importance of physical attractiveness, and found this graph in one of them:fuk:. Tfw people desperately try to convince each other that beauty is subjective when there's a clear relationship between being attractive and being in a...

incels.is

Tagging some high-IQ brocels who might be interested or participated in the above thread @Epedaphic @OutcompetedByRoomba @Copexodius Maximus @CopeHarderNow @lifefuel @NorthernWind @Robb97 @Celius @kointo @cvh1991

Just another example of the halo effect. John Stossel’s video on lookism should blackpill 101 for normies. It showed experimentally attractive people got jobs way easier, were helped by people much more, and were seen more positively. It was brutal because everything we say was shown, and seeing it hits the point home more for most people.

 

[cvh1991]

Does it pay to be beautiful?

Physically attractive people can earn more, particularly in customer-facing jobs, and the rewards for men are higher than for women

wol.iza.org

Jfl. Every single time women get reminded of how much they benefit from their gender, the number one retort is that they are just seen as sex objects and that's horrible and men can never understand it and bla bla bla. Yet, despite supposedly not being always seen as "just a sex object", when it comes to one of the most important things in a person's life, how much money they earn, men are penalized harder than women.

Just look at those graphs above lmao. When it comes to good-looking people being paid more, there are countries where women profit so much more than men from that, that the study didn't notice any men profitting from this (they almost certainly are as well, it just didn't find them.) Specifically, in Brazil, Czech Republic and at least some parts of China (well, at least Shanghai), Stacies are happily profitting from their good looks getting them extra money while their Chad counterparts seemingly don't get anything, because even Chad's power can't compete with a Stacy's there. In China in general, unlike just Shanghai, both good-looking men and women have a wage premium, Germany has Stacies getting more than Chads, Luxembourg has Stacies getting more than Chads as well and actually has Chads punished for their looks and earning less because of that. Meanwhile, North American countries, Canada and the US, are the only ones where Chads have higher bonuses to their wages than Stacies.

Now look at the graph with wage hits unattractive people suffer. In Australia, despite supposedly not being seen as just a sex object and actually being seen as people or whatever, it seems to be only the unattractive men that suffer a large hit to their earnings due to being ugly. In the Czech Republic, in contrast to seemingly only Stacies profitting from their good looks, both unattractive men and women are penalized for their bad looks, but incels are hit harder than fem"cels", despite the latter supposedly being the ones who should be hated for not adhering to "societal standards for women." In China as a whole, just like all attractive people have a wage premium, so do all unattractive people get a wage penalty. In the UK and North America as a whole, there's a bigger wage penalty for unattractive men than women, while another source for the US alone has both incels and fem"cels" suffering equally for their shit looks.

Men "aren't seen just for their looks" holes say, yet when it comes to wage discrimination, something that had been one of their prime talking points despite the "gender pay gap" being completely refuted so many times over and over and over and over and over and over again that it's just sad at this point, it is the men that are clearly hit harder. And yet, women say that they are the ones suffering due to how society focuses on their looks.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/16yt62a/it_seems_like_men_fail_to_understand_that_the/




And that's not even talking about the fact that not only are better-looking people paid better in their jobs, they also naturally cluster in better-paid jobs in general, meaning that there's multiple self-supportinglayers to their economic priviledges.

Share of employees reported as having very good looks by occupation in Germany

Just looked for some fresh, 2022 and 2023 studies/articles on the importance of physical attractiveness, and found this graph in one of them:fuk:. Tfw people desperately try to convince each other that beauty is subjective when there's a clear relationship between being attractive and being in a...

incels.is

Tagging some high-IQ brocels who might be interested or participated in the above thread @Epedaphic @OutcompetedByRoomba @Copexodius Maximus @CopeHarderNow @lifefuel @NorthernWind @Robb97 @Celius @kointo @cvh1991

Good comment mate thanks for the tag. The delusion from women on purple pill debate is just ridiculous.

“Well akschully getting attention from the opposite and being able to get laid due to my looks is a bad thing”

Jesus fucking god it’s enraging to me. They really genuinely have no conception (or they’re willfully dishonest) of what their hellish lives would be like if suddenly all that attention disappeared. That one lad in the replies had it right when he said for men being valued for your body would be a big upgrade to not hiring valued at all. These delusional copes women come up with are just pathetic to be honest. It’s like comparing the suffering of a wealthy aristocrat to the suffering of the starving poor. Not even comparable on any level yet everyone acts like it is.

 

[Celius]

Looks are paramount. They’re the only thing that matters from the day you were born to the day you’re going to die, and if God forbid, the ugly man becomes cognizant of the lies he was told, of how good deeds will never guarantee reward, of how karma doesn’t exist, of how having a personality is meaningless, of how hard work and effort only come through at the cost of sacrificing your soul to a society that wants your kind to relinquish into nonexistence, he will only then see the world for what it is: a playground for natural selection in which only the superior gene pool is preferred and favored.

But in the end, is it really worth it? Ultimately, it comes down to a simple matter of would you rather live a lie and remain blissful or finally wake up and decide not to play a rigged game? And if it’s the latter, then the inescapable fallout could be potentially devastating.

Every single time women get reminded of how much they benefit from their gender, the number one retort is that they are just seen as sex objects and that's horrible and men can never understand it and bla bla bla. Yet, despite supposedly not being always seen as "just a sex object", when it comes to one of the most important things in a person's life, how much money they earn, men are penalized harder than women.

When you’re given tutorial mode, the only way to camouflage yourself amongst the common is to masquerade as the oppressed.

 

[Soulflayer]

Looks are paramount. They’re the only thing that matters from the day you were born to the day you’re going to die, and if God forbid, the ugly man becomes cognizant of the lies he was told, of how good deeds will never be rewarded, of how karma doesn’t exist, of how having a personality is meaningless, of how hard work and effort only come through at the cost of sacrificing your soul to a society that wants your kind to relinquish into nonexistence, he will only then see the world for what it is: a playground for natural selection in which only the superior gene pool is preferred and favored.

But in the end, is it really worth it? Ultimately, it comes down to a simple matter of would you rather live a lie and remain blissful or finally wake up and decide not to play a rigged game? And if it’s the latter, then the inescapable fallout could be potentially devastating.


When you’re given tutorial mode, the only way to camouflage yourself amongst the common is to masquerade as the oppressed.

take ur fucking meds, i dont wanna see none of ur loony ramblings on inceldom discussion