verybasedindeed
ㅤ
-
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2023
- Posts
- 2,824
I'm agnostic on the topic of evolution, as I'm not completely convinced that the description given by evolutionists entirely makes sense.
I kinda understand why incels would want to believe in macroevolution. If an amoeba can turn into a whale, the prospect of an incel becoming a Chad suddenly sounds like the easiest thing in the world.
How else do you explain it?
KikesHow else do you explain it?
ExplainKikes
this, so much this!No nigga, everything we see in reality is invented by the CIA, jews, and lizard people
Bruh, that’s not how it worksI kinda understand why incels would want to believe in macroevolution. If an amoeba can turn into a whale, the prospect of an incel becoming a Chad suddenly sounds like the easiest thing in the world.
True, an incel can't even reproduce wich is necessary for evolutionBruh, that’s not how it works
If anything evolution is actually pretty black pilledI kinda understand why incels would want to believe in macroevolution. If an amoeba can turn into a whale, the prospect of an incel becoming a Chad suddenly sounds like the easiest thing in the world.
I know, I was joking. Although the prospect of an amoeba turning into a whale still seems far-fetched with a shitload of generations between the two.Bruh, that’s not how it works
I reject both the idea that Chads are necessarily better than incels (being a Chad is more about looks than anything else - you can have great looks and poor health, low intellect, mental issues galore, etc) and the idea that good-looking people are taking over the world while ugly people are dying out.If anything evolution is actually pretty black pilled
All of evolution is that better creatures (Chads) from better genetics reproduce more and survive while shit creature ( incels) die out
evolution is single digit IQ garbage
Most traits Chads have are actually useful, like being tall which would make you better at hunting . There are some traits that aren't directly useful like good looks, however they would imply good health. A symmetric face would imply they were not malnourished during childhood and were able to develop properly.I reject both the idea that Chads are necessarily better than incels (being a Chad is more about looks than anything else - you can have great looks and poor health, low intellect, mental issues galore, etc) and the idea that good-looking people are taking over the world while ugly people are dying out.
Chad are the minority, so them being born is a small amount is no surprise the real questions is will more chads as a proportion of births get born in the futureEven nowadays, with all the influence feminism has (which makes looks even much more important than usual), you can't deny there are like 100 ugly people being born for each Chad being born. Particularly when you consider which countries have the biggest birth rates (India, African countries, etc).
The reason why african countries and India have the highest birth rates is because they don't have feminism. If they did their birth rates would be lower, in fact the places with the lowest birthrates aren't white countries they are east asian countries, South Korea has a fertility rate of 0.7 about 1/3 of the replacement rate. Meaning each generation is 1/3 the size of the lastFeminism, if anything, is causing birth rates to be low as shit in the most feminist countries and whites (which are the best looking race on average, I think this is not even controversial to say here) to slowly die out. Which is not what you'd expect considering the whole "let women free to choose" typical darwiniancel argument (not saying you propose this exactly though, I hope not).