From a young age the genetically pacified "men" of today have been told to "leave their ego at the door" whenever they have any traces of self-respect, dignity or natural aggression in them.
One's ego, or better said, one's natural sense of psychosocial self-preservation, is seen as something bad, when at the same time so called "confidence" is espoused to be the end-all-be-all solution for everyone.
There is one major problem with this though:
As a subhuman male you simply can't afford to be seen as an easy target.
People already hate you for just existing, and you "not having an ego" is only beneficial to them.
Especially for sub-5s , autists, low-T-cels, and cripplecels, this gaslighting into social submission can and will be detrimental in the long run.
Let me tell you my story, so you hopefully can relate to me:
My whole life i was told that "having an ego" and "feeling entitled" was somehow bad.
On the other hand my parents thought me that being a risk-averse little bitch was somehow "smart".
There is even a german phrase for it:
"The smarter one submits!"
Not only did my parents decide to pass on my mother's shit genes onto me, but they also raised me to be a pussy.
And i got bullied because of it.
I already contemplated going E.R. at 16 years of age.
I fell into a redpill self-improvement obsession that got me into a psych ward.
I considered injecting trenbolone at some point in my life.
All that could be prevented, or mitigated at the very least if i learned to defend my social status.
As a sub-5 male your "honor" and your "ego" is more valuable than anything in life.
Not only for your social status, but also for your own mental health.
Those two things, social status and mental health are so correlated with each other that they are basically the same thing anyway.
Losing one's "face" is far more devastating than almost any injury, since it dooms you to pretty much lifelong depression and anxiety and is almost impossible to regain.
Remember that word i used earlier?:
"Psychosocial self-preservation"
To be fair i pretty much pulled it out of my ass, but it is really fitting for the thing i'm talking about.
It signifies the interconnection between psychological health and social status, and puts the preservation of oneself, not weakness or stupidity or god-forbid "fragile masculinity", as the main objective of aggressive behaviour.
It sure as hell is more fitting than "ego" or "pride".
If you are sub-5, you absolutely need to compensate for it.
It won't get you women, nothing will, but at least the normies will let you live in relative peace.
There is a reason why normies say that thugmaxxers and gymcels are compensating, it's simply because they more often than not need to compensate to not end up as doormats for normies.
Being lean-athletic, having some nigger haircut with the sides and back of your head completely shaved off, wearing nigger street clothes, having tatooes...
can make a load of difference in how much bullshit you have to deal with on a daily basis.
Gymcelling and thugcelling is truly underrated, especially if you combine it with weaponmaxxing, martial-arts-celling and other things that actually make you hard to hurt.
Looking hard is still way more important than actually being hard though.
Be warned: there is absolutely no need to be more thugmaxxed than you need to be.
Anything more than being "threatening enough" to not be a victim is counterproductive.
You just need to make the cut.
You just need to look threatening enough for normies to think that bullying you is not worth the risk.
No need to be a shredded 230lb monstercel or look like you just escaped from prison if you live in a rich white suburb.
You will just be a laughing stock if you do that.
One's ego, or better said, one's natural sense of psychosocial self-preservation, is seen as something bad, when at the same time so called "confidence" is espoused to be the end-all-be-all solution for everyone.
There is one major problem with this though:
As a subhuman male you simply can't afford to be seen as an easy target.
People already hate you for just existing, and you "not having an ego" is only beneficial to them.
Especially for sub-5s , autists, low-T-cels, and cripplecels, this gaslighting into social submission can and will be detrimental in the long run.
Let me tell you my story, so you hopefully can relate to me:
My whole life i was told that "having an ego" and "feeling entitled" was somehow bad.
On the other hand my parents thought me that being a risk-averse little bitch was somehow "smart".
There is even a german phrase for it:
"The smarter one submits!"
Not only did my parents decide to pass on my mother's shit genes onto me, but they also raised me to be a pussy.
And i got bullied because of it.
I already contemplated going E.R. at 16 years of age.
I fell into a redpill self-improvement obsession that got me into a psych ward.
I considered injecting trenbolone at some point in my life.
All that could be prevented, or mitigated at the very least if i learned to defend my social status.
As a sub-5 male your "honor" and your "ego" is more valuable than anything in life.
Not only for your social status, but also for your own mental health.
Those two things, social status and mental health are so correlated with each other that they are basically the same thing anyway.
Losing one's "face" is far more devastating than almost any injury, since it dooms you to pretty much lifelong depression and anxiety and is almost impossible to regain.
Remember that word i used earlier?:
"Psychosocial self-preservation"
To be fair i pretty much pulled it out of my ass, but it is really fitting for the thing i'm talking about.
It signifies the interconnection between psychological health and social status, and puts the preservation of oneself, not weakness or stupidity or god-forbid "fragile masculinity", as the main objective of aggressive behaviour.
It sure as hell is more fitting than "ego" or "pride".
If you are sub-5, you absolutely need to compensate for it.
It won't get you women, nothing will, but at least the normies will let you live in relative peace.
There is a reason why normies say that thugmaxxers and gymcels are compensating, it's simply because they more often than not need to compensate to not end up as doormats for normies.
Being lean-athletic, having some nigger haircut with the sides and back of your head completely shaved off, wearing nigger street clothes, having tatooes...
can make a load of difference in how much bullshit you have to deal with on a daily basis.
Gymcelling and thugcelling is truly underrated, especially if you combine it with weaponmaxxing, martial-arts-celling and other things that actually make you hard to hurt.
Looking hard is still way more important than actually being hard though.
Be warned: there is absolutely no need to be more thugmaxxed than you need to be.
Anything more than being "threatening enough" to not be a victim is counterproductive.
You just need to make the cut.
You just need to look threatening enough for normies to think that bullying you is not worth the risk.
No need to be a shredded 230lb monstercel or look like you just escaped from prison if you live in a rich white suburb.
You will just be a laughing stock if you do that.
Last edited:
