My favourite genre is "thrillers" for movies and books. Crime thrillers and action/spy thrillers. But very unnecessary sex-scenes in almost all movies you watch (really can't get around it), even in the books. I won't understand anyone who says these scenes or descriptions are necessary. Either way, they make me feel uncomfortable, mad.
I try to skip these parts.
I also listen to thrillers as audiobooks to distract me from the constant silence around me and also distract me from my dark thoughts.
Now I often notice that totally unnecessary sex or affectionate scenes are written. And characters are often described as attractive - females as 'very pretty' or 'hot body and very beautiful face' some shit like that. And unironically the characters who then have sex or become affectionate are BOTH described as attractive and often young (in books) or are attractive and young (in movies).
So... if the blackpill were sO fALsE, why is the personality never described as an attraction but almost always LOOKS are?
I mean, come on. Basically my question is, why are they trying to dispute the blackpill - when in fact the world and attraction, reflects it's ideas?
I try to skip these parts.
I also listen to thrillers as audiobooks to distract me from the constant silence around me and also distract me from my dark thoughts.
Now I often notice that totally unnecessary sex or affectionate scenes are written. And characters are often described as attractive - females as 'very pretty' or 'hot body and very beautiful face' some shit like that. And unironically the characters who then have sex or become affectionate are BOTH described as attractive and often young (in books) or are attractive and young (in movies).
So... if the blackpill were sO fALsE, why is the personality never described as an attraction but almost always LOOKS are?
I mean, come on. Basically my question is, why are they trying to dispute the blackpill - when in fact the world and attraction, reflects it's ideas?
Last edited:
