[Serious] It’s unnatural for women to choose men based on their looks

S

Silverandgold

Recruit
Joined
Jul 14, 2019
Posts
53
Online
7h 51m
It's UNNATURAL for women to choose men based on their looks

MEN are the visual ones that have to choose women based on their looks since looks determine a woman's fertility and her likelihood of surviving childbirth (i.e. if she has wide enough hips, etc). Not only that, but a man needs to be sexually attracted to a woman to achieve an erection so he can penetrate her and thus impregnate her.

WOMEN, in nature, choose men based on their intelligence, bravery, work ethic, and their ability to protect and provide. Women are not visual like men. They do not need to be sexually attracted to their partners to have sex and get pregnant.

Life goes on if a woman is not sexually attracted to her partner. For most of our existence as a species women were either raped, forcefully married off in arranged marriages, or they chose men based on their resources and ability to provide. We did not multiply to 7.5 billion people because women chose tall men with attractive faces. Now is the first time in history that women are focusing on looks and thus we are having a major decline in birth rates.

Women choosing men based on looks = extinction of humans.
Men choosing women based on looks = the continuation of the human race.

When I was young, it made me angry that women were gold diggers. I just wanted a woman who was my equal and wanted me for me, not my ability to provide. I grew up in a traditional orthodox Jewish community and my parents expected me to court and eventually marry one of the traditional girls in our community and become her provider. That sounded like slavery to me. I didn't want that. I'm ugly so none of the girls were dying to get to know me anyway, but I figure that if I would've actually tried hard to make something of myself and court those girls they would've been interested in my resources. But I never tried. I was shy and reclusive and was always hoping to leave the community one day and find an independent woman who loves me for who I am, not what I can provide. One of the girls in my community who was a family friend ended up leaving the community herself to go to college. When she came back from college, she was a feminist and had given up her religion, and ended up moving out of the community. I got quite close with her and wanted to be with her. I thought this educated woman will like me for my personality and the fact that I respect her independence and see her as an equal. But she just viewed me as a brother. With her degree and high paying career, she only wanted to date good looking men. They were often better looking than her. She ended up having kids with a random man who didn't even stick by her. She became a single mom. Now she's old and nobody wants her I offered to be with her a few years ago. But even being an old hag single mother, she thought she was too good for me. She is not the only example. I've gotten to know other independent, educated women over the years, and they could never look past my short stature and ugly face. It doesn't matter if we had things in common or had good chemistry. My looks were a deal breaker. The moral of the story is that if I could go back in time and work on my education and accumulating resources to attract a woman the old fashioned way, I would. I was delusional to think that women are equal to men and that I could attract a woman who loves me for my personality. NO!! Women are only attracted to two things: looks and money. If you aren't in the top 10% lookswise then it's OVER for you and you have to find a way to become financially attractive. However, from what I understand, it's getting harder and harder for men to attract women nowadays even if they DO have the money and resources. Since more and more women are becoming educated and making their own money, they no longer rely on men for money and thus they place more of an emphasis on looks. Ok, the REAL moral of the story is: IT'S A MISTAKE THAT WOMEN WERE EVER GIVEN THE RIGHT TO WORK!
 
Genetic Dead End

Genetic Dead End

I want out
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
Posts
1,912
Online
37d 19h 43m
Good post.
 
Mahlo

Mahlo

Lost time is never found again.
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
1,997
Online
41d 20h 35m
Seems like you're confusing reality for what you want reality to be
 
TheSecondComing

TheSecondComing

no looks no life
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
23,573
Online
121d 16h 43m
wall of cope probably
 
B

BRCel123

Officer
★★★★
Joined
May 13, 2018
Posts
856
Online
11d 10h 3m
Women were always visual
 
ScornedStoic

ScornedStoic

Archaeologist
-
Joined
Apr 5, 2018
Posts
15,546
Online
52d 5h 59m
Well that's because it's never just been all about looks unlike what 99% of what this forum thinks. Looks have always been like between a third and a half of it.
 
S

Silverandgold

Recruit
Joined
Jul 14, 2019
Posts
53
Online
7h 51m
They are visual but not in the same way we are. Men NEED to be visual to procreate. Women don’t. We have to experience sexual attraction to get an erection and to impregnate someone. A woman does not have to be sexually attracted to someone to have sex and get pregnant. Most of our ancestors were conceived through rape. So a woman by nature is not visual in the same way a man is. Her sexual preferences don’t matter. Life goes on if she doesn’t find a man sexually attractive. She’ll still get pregnant.
 
grondilu

grondilu

Legend
★★★★
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Posts
3,831
Online
72d 11h 24m
Beware when you use the word "natural", it's charged.

Anyway, women have probably always picked men on looks, but not for long term relationships, rather for cuckolding.

I agree though that if looks becomes the only criteria for forming mating couples, our species is doomed.

Overall, good post, greycel. Welcome to the forum.
 
Last edited:
littlemanhikicel

littlemanhikicel

Incel trait: not have a life
★★★
Joined
Feb 3, 2019
Posts
5,207
Online
18d 14h 48m
You're right. For women it is better to have a strong man (regardless of face or size) and intelligent than in a hostile environment is more useful to protect the offspring.
 
grondilu

grondilu

Legend
★★★★
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Posts
3,831
Online
72d 11h 24m
Men NEED to be visual to procreate. Women don’t. We have to experience sexual attraction to get an erection and to impregnate someone. A woman does not have to be sexually attracted to someone to have sex and get pregnant.
Agreed.

Basically, desire is only required on the male part.
 
happiless

happiless

genetic trash
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
5,738
Online
60d 7h 5m
No, it's natural but uncivilized.
 
grondilu

grondilu

Legend
★★★★
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Posts
3,831
Online
72d 11h 24m
No, it's natural but uncivilized.
This.

There is no point criticizing anything by saying "it's not natural". We live in an artificial environment and we obey cultural rules, and we've been doing so ever since we discovered fire, basically.
 
Legendarywristcel

Legendarywristcel

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
6,226
Online
90d 13h 54m
They are visual but not in the same way we are. Men NEED to be visual to procreate. Women don’t. We have to experience sexual attraction to get an erection and to impregnate someone. A woman does not have to be sexually attracted to someone to have sex and get pregnant. Most of our ancestors were conceived through rape. So a woman by nature is not visual in the same way a man is. Her sexual preferences don’t matter. Life goes on if she doesn’t find a man sexually attractive. She’ll still get pregnant.
Women were never raped (in the same sense as they are now) in our evolutionary history. Its because women werent nearly as picky. The way things played out was the strongest, fittest and most dominant men were able to have their pick of women and prevent access (of women) to the weaker men.

It was a bit like the chimpanzees of today practice social dominance. The female chimps are not picky and would gladly fuck any male chimp during mating season. However, the biggest strongest male chimps drive off the weaker men and male to male violence is extremely high ( as is common to human polyamarous societies btw)

Female pickiness is an evolved trait in response to humans settling down.
 
bananapile69

bananapile69

To swallow the Blackpill separates from emotions
★★★
Joined
Nov 1, 2019
Posts
738
Online
2d 36m
WOMEN, in nature, choose men based on their intelligence, bravery, work ethic, and their ability to protect and provide. Women are not visual like men. They do not need to be sexually attracted to their partners to have sex and get pregnant.
Cope, women do not have any power whatsoever in nature. They just follow commands. In nature it is the males that fight each other and decide who is getting the female. Females don't have any say in the matter.
 
Reddit_is_for_cucks

Reddit_is_for_cucks

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Posts
6,959
Online
31d 22h 13m
Women are not visual like men.
Biggest lie told to men
 
DeathtoallChads

DeathtoallChads

Aspergers. Looking forward to the next Rebellion.
★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
647
Online
10d 14h 29m
And the problem is only getting worse with apps like Tinder.
 
Hate_my_life

Hate_my_life

Genetic Failure - Never began
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 30, 2018
Posts
12,260
Online
66d 22h 57m
OP r u jewish
 
zangano1

zangano1

The truest of cels
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
21,007
Online
62d 19h 21m
I always wanted to make this post but i was too lazy and now I can't do it anymore
 
R

RobustManlet

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Jun 17, 2019
Posts
319
Online
3d 20h 51m
Women choosing men based on their looks = population bottleneck. Which is a good thing, the world needs fewer subhuman. Maybe in the future men will look better because only good looking guys reproduce in modern countries nowadays.
 
Gyros_Pretcel

Gyros_Pretcel

19th c. Church of Hamlossus high priest contender
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Posts
6,040
Online
106d 9h 46m
Well that's because it's never just been all about looks unlike what 99% of what this forum thinks. Looks have always been like between a third and a half of it.
ded srs?
 
ScornedStoic

ScornedStoic

Archaeologist
-
Joined
Apr 5, 2018
Posts
15,546
Online
52d 5h 59m
Ded srs, looks are just as important as demeanor (not personality). Those together make up two thirds of it and one third is resources/status, unless that's not at play like in some situations where it's 50/50

The girls society considers "shallow" go more for the attractiveness, whereas the "beckies" go more for demeanor, resources, status, ect
 
RopeMaXXer

RopeMaXXer

getting dabbed on by waging
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Posts
2,569
Online
37d 17h 36m
Yet they do and are even more aggressive with their demands
 
Top