Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Cope National pride - the most pathetic cope there is

ColdLightOfDay

ColdLightOfDay

Serge’s alt.
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 18, 2018
Posts
5,717
My favourite quote on this comes from Schopenhauer;

The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.
For example; if you speak of the stupid and degrading bigotry of the English nation with the contempt that it deserves, you will hardly find one Englishman in fifty to agree with you, but if you should find one, he should happen to be an intelligent man.


There are far better ways to cope than with national pride, or pride of any kind for that matter. If you truly believe in genetic determinism - as all who are blackpilled should - then all pride is rendered a lower form of cope. I believe egodeath is the noblest and most productive path for those born into lives with so little to be proud about, this allows you to laugh at those who consider themselves better than you simply for having been born into a different type of body.
 
just allow genocide of your people br0
 
just allow genocide of your people br0
My people were the first who rejected and shunned me. They cast the first stone and they deserve my purest hatred.
 
High IQ

Why should I give a fuck about the area of land I live on and the people who happen to live near me when it has done nothing for me, and rejected me because of my looks?

Schopenhauer = best philosopher
 
"
The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.
For example; if you speak of the stupid and degrading bigotry of the English nation with the contempt that it deserves, you will hardly find one Englishman in fifty to agree with you, but if you should find one, he should happen to be an intelligent man.

"

What Schopenhauer means here is that the facade of national pride is being based on a faulty representation of the state, while ignoring the needs of one's inner sentimentalism. National Socialism perfectly recognizes this facade under statehood, along with many other fascista movements. Their primary directives were aimed at ensuring the collective expression of one's universally applicable spirit would reveal itself and cast away the statehood prejudices that encompass it.
 
I hate my people they can die
 
High IQ

Why should I give a fuck about the area of land I live on and the people who happen to live near me when it has done nothing for me, and rejected me because of my looks?

Schopenhauer = best philosopher
You're directly contradicting Schopenhauer's sophomoric proposition. The state is t collectively represent individuals based on their collective spiritual qualities if the state is done proper. What he's referring to, is that individuals who take national pride have no inner QUALITIES to embrace e.g., aestheticism, pluralism, etc.
 
National/racial pride is a cope.

But, so is national/racial hatred. And that seems to be a popular one here, lately, amongst certain 'cels.
 
Stopped reading after the first sentence, I can tell you from it that it's a logical fallacy and a massive cope. There are plenty of men with great qualities who also happen to be proud of their nation.
 
National/racial pride is a cope.

But, so is national/racial hatred. And that seems to be a popular one here, lately, amongst certain 'cels.
Can you provide a reasoned argument proving this?
 
You're directly contradicting Schopenhauer's sophomoric proposition. The state is t collectively represent individuals based on their collective spiritual qualities if the state is done proper. What he's referring to, is that individuals who take national pride have no inner QUALITIES to embrace e.g., aestheticism, pluralism, etc.

I don’t see how that’s a direct contradiction. It’s not the same as his reasoning, but it’s not a direct contradiction.
 
I don’t see how that’s a direct contradiction. It’s not the same as his reasoning, but it’s not a direct contradiction.
It contradicts what the meaning of statehood is. If you have a loose tribe of personalities interacting, then inevitably the rules of aesthetics will apply. If the state is effective, it will ensure equal and fair male representation based on civil order.
 
Incels are the niggers of their race.
 
Lithuanians had chance, but where illiterate barbarians, unable to assimilate gained nations, so tfu on that pathetic hopeless small nation of roasties and cucks what lithuania is now. All pride is in past, today is just shame

113579
 
It contradicts what the meaning of statehood is. If you have a loose tribe of personalities interacting, then inevitably the rules of aesthetics will apply. If the state is effective, it will ensure equal and fair male representation based on civil order.
No, it certainly will not. Natural order accounts for the unequal representation observable in the modern world. What we see today is actually more reminiscent of ancient societies (where as we all know only 1/17 men were able to mate.) Here we are speaking about a time when identifying with one’s ‘own people’ was even more culturally ingrained than in the 20th century examples you refer to.
 
No, it certainly will not. Natural order accounts for the unequal representation observable in the modern world. What we see today is actually more reminiscent of ancient societies (where as we all know only 1/17 men were able to mate.) Here we are speaking about a time when identifying with one’s ‘own people’ was even more culturally ingrained than in the 20th century examples you refer to.
You're misrepresenting a historical class of aesthetically gifted individuals mating amongst each other. This has always existed in every socio-sexual hierarchy, and will not ever cease to exist entirely. In some ways, I'd argue, this could be beneficial to the state. However, this archaic world was filled with serfdom classes that would produce in mass quantities through mating with each other. Sufferage causes more of a necessity for mating, thus ridding of inceldom. Furthermore, the serf classes were encouraged by the aesthetically gifted classes to procreate for new stock. The struggle was taken away from finding a mate to producing for the family, which led to a diversion of class instincts towards preservation of the family unit.
 
You're misrepresenting a historical class of aesthetically gifted individuals mating amongst each other. This has always existed in every socio-sexual hierarchy, and will not ever cease to exist entirely. In some ways, I'd argue, this could be beneficial to the state. However, this archaic world was filled with serfdom classes that would produce in mass quantities through mating with each other. Sufferage causes more of a necessity for mating, thus ridding of inceldom. Furthermore, the serf classes were encouraged by the aesthetically gifted classes to procreate for new stock. The struggle was taken away from finding a mate to producing for the family, which led to a diversion of class instincts towards preservation of the family unit.
Civil order and totalitarianism wasn’t what kept hypergamy in check during Nazi Germany, it was the combination of social pressure, less vapid culture and reduced sexual impetus as a result of fewer opportunities - this was present throughout all European countries at the time.
 
Civil order and totalitarianism wasn’t what kept hypergamy in check during Nazi Germany, it was the combination of social pressure, less vapid culture and reduced sexual impetus as a result of fewer opportunities - this was present throughout all European countries at the time.
This was exactly what I said.
 
This was exactly what I said.
Either way, national pride has nothing to do with it though? Also - If anything ethnic minorities are usually more sexually conservative than the native white populations they share a country with.
 
Either way, national pride has nothing to do with it though? Also - If anything ethnic minorities are usually more sexually conservative than the native white populations they share a country with.
National pride, or rather, authority has everything to do with forcefully putting individuals in circumstances in which they will need to gravitate to those within a certain social class regardless of their socio-sexual function. The best group we know that constructs hierarchies are those of Caucasoid origin. Particularly Nordic and Alpine.
Either way, national pride has nothing to do with it though? Also - If anything ethnic minorities are usually more sexually conservative than the native white populations they share a country with.
That's because their peoples have remained unmolested internally by the foreign elements i.e., jews.
 
National pride, or rather, authority has everything to do with forcefully putting individuals in circumstances in which they will need to gravitate to those within a certain social class regardless of their socio-sexual function. The best group we know that constructs hierarchies are those of Caucasoid origin. Particularly Nordic and Alpine.
I don’t see why national pride is necessary for such social traditions to exist.
 
My people were the first who rejected and shunned me. They cast the first stone and they deserve my purest hatred.

Failed normie fakecel stormfags don't feel the same way. Because they are fakecels who don't even know what being universally hated by everyone around them for years feels like.


just allow genocide of your people br0

Fuck off back to /pol/ stormcuck
 
youre retarded tbh I was Impersonating insomniac

That's a worse excuse. Do you really have so tenuous of a personality that you can't even bother to post and behave in your own way? Why would you feel the need to imitate someone else on a fucking incel forum? Insomniac was a retard and only a bigger retard would imitate him.
 
That's a worse excuse. Do you really have so tenuous of a personality that you can't even bother to post and behave in your own way? Why would you feel the need to imitate someone else on a fucking incel forum? Insomniac was a retard and only a bigger retard would imitate him.

youre being disingenuous, youre implying as if I did as a form of admiration and because I am incapable of forming my own personality. When in reality in it only takes a few brain cells to realize that i was imitating him for the sake of entertainment,otherwise why would I change my signature and title ifI I at least would understand this point of view if I only were to change my avi an were more subtle about it, insomniac was the second most prominent poster meaning people got accustomed to his avi, signature and style of writing making it easy for me to confuse people. you really are retarded
 
Last edited:
I don’t see why national pride is necessary for such social traditions to exist.
National Pride isn't really a thing, it's a form of brand recognition. You package identitarianism up in a nice little ideological box with principles and appeal. That's all something really is at its core in ideology.
 
"
The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.
For example; if you speak of the stupid and degrading bigotry of the English nation with the contempt that it deserves, you will hardly find one Englishman in fifty to agree with you, but if you should find one, he should happen to be an intelligent man.

"

What Schopenhauer means here is that the facade of national pride is being based on a faulty representation of the state, while ignoring the needs of one's inner sentimentalism. National Socialism perfectly recognizes this facade under statehood, along with many other fascista movements. Their primary directives were aimed at ensuring the collective expression of one's universally applicable spirit would reveal itself and cast away the statehood prejudices that encompass it.
This is the whole problem what is the example of the nation in question that shopenhauer is referring to? If it's america then obviously yea nations are pointless and nationalism is a flawed idea because america as a nation is just a political border where the people only share money. A real nation based on an ethos and race is something more rare in the modern world but serving your own kind to the fullest potential is not a cope.
 
also being proud of your ethnicity/roots is stupid as well. Not like you got to choose it. well i speak from my viewpoint, getting the short end of the stick.
 
Do you think that Inceldom would exist if all men were blue eyed, blonde and tall?
 
Do you think that Inceldom would exist if all men were blue eyed, blonde and tall?
[/QUOTEYes. The hypergamous desires would just shift to formulate new wants and means to satisfaction.
 
Yeah man, the Ancient Greeks were such losers and cucks for finally coming together and defeating the Persians. Man, what losers, haha.
 
Yeah man, the Ancient Greeks were such losers and cucks for finally coming together and defeating the Persians. Man, what losers, haha.
‘Greece’ as we know it was in no way a nation in ancient times. Ancient Greek city states where individual nations with separate forms of government. If anything they put aside their national pride to work together for a common goal, although it wasn’t very long before they went back to fighting against each other...

 
‘Greece’ as we know it was in no way a nation in ancient times. Ancient Greek city states where individual nations with separate forms of government. If anything they put aside their national pride to work together for a common goal, although it wasn’t very long before they went back to fighting against each other...


They united as Hellens (Greeks) Greeks (Hellens) saw themselves as superior to non-Hellens (non Greeks). The Persian invasion was stopped by a united-Greek force. Yes after the wars they went back to fighting among each other, but the point stands.

Barbarian literally means,"a person who is not Greek" , Romans and Christians were later added to the definition.
 
They united as Hellens (Greeks) Greeks (Hellens) saw themselves as superior to non-Hellens (non Greeks). The Persian invasion was stopped by a united-Greek force. Yes after the wars they went back to fighting among each other, but the point stands.

Barbarian literally means,"a person who is not Greek" , Romans and Christians were later added to the definition.
This is not comparable to modern day national pride.
 
National pride means nothing when your people are cucks.
 
NoFap is a better cope
 

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
10
Views
277
Biowaste Removal
Biowaste Removal
Vlarke
Replies
44
Views
656
lifesucksandyoudie
lifesucksandyoudie
Da_Yunez
Replies
29
Views
866
gotet
gotet
Samurai
Replies
6
Views
359
wastedcodeine
wastedcodeine

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top