Disclaimer: I think pedophilia, if correctly defined, is morally wrong. And anyone who practices it should be thrown in jail to rot for the rest of their life. I don’t condone or support pedophilia in any way.
Normies often shame incels for being attracted to JB. And they often bash older guys who date 17-18 year olds. However, these same normies would accuse anyone who criticises others cultures of being a racist/xenophobe/islamophobe. Most normies are “woke” Neo-liberal NPCs who hold the notion that all cultures and races are equal - they even go as far as to claim that IQ differences between races don’t exist. Any criticism of say, African tribes or middle eastern desert fighters is immediately labelled as racism and any “immoral” act is often explained away by saying “it’s their culture”. This postmodernist, Marxist trap is one that many normies fall into. And as a result, they’re often left unable to explain why certain things are wrong or immoral. So, what if we find a culture where the majority of men marry 11 year olds and where sleeping with pre-pubescent girls is encouraged? Isn’t that pedophilia (the definition normies have is a bit loose and has nothing to do with pedophilia. I’m working with the actual definition of pedophilia here which is the attraction to pre-pubescent kids). How does a normalfag explain this obvious contradiction. I mean, as a normie, you don’t want to be called a racist for saying that what these people do is immoral, right? That’s basically social suicide. Well, they don’t. They keep living in denial. So, by normie logic, saying that certain aspects of foreign cultures ( which might include pedophilia) is utterly racist and xenophobic — i.e. criticising pedos is racist and xenophobic . To me that’s hypocritical. Yet, you have many normies calling us racist. But by their logic, we’re in the same category as them. To be frank, I’m not surprised. Those are the same people who use #KillAllMen on Twitter but freak out when a man that belongs to a (((marginalised))) group gets shot. Those are the same people who can’t shut up about “muh patriarchy” while ignoring the biological and social differences between men and women.
Moreover, normies are not able to justify why pedophilia is morally wrong. Their entire view on morality is utterly subjective (and so is mine for that matter, but I don’t calming to be morally superior to others). By saying pedophilia is wrong since they have no objective moral basis, they’re merely offering their own opinion. Why should we go by their moral values? Who are they to say that Islamic values are wrong, or that the moral system of African tribes or the vikings is wrong?
Normie arguments are usually something along the lines of “because it traumatises the victim”. But why should we value the well-being of the victim? if they say “because that’s the things are” they are essentially getting an ought from an is, which, as you know, is philosophically problematic. In conclusion, the postmodernist “woke” ideology that most normies adhere to claims that all races/cultures are equal, but at the same time they call certain aspects of other cultures immoral, implying that these cultures are morally inferior, solely based on subjective moral values.
Thoughts?
Normies often shame incels for being attracted to JB. And they often bash older guys who date 17-18 year olds. However, these same normies would accuse anyone who criticises others cultures of being a racist/xenophobe/islamophobe. Most normies are “woke” Neo-liberal NPCs who hold the notion that all cultures and races are equal - they even go as far as to claim that IQ differences between races don’t exist. Any criticism of say, African tribes or middle eastern desert fighters is immediately labelled as racism and any “immoral” act is often explained away by saying “it’s their culture”. This postmodernist, Marxist trap is one that many normies fall into. And as a result, they’re often left unable to explain why certain things are wrong or immoral. So, what if we find a culture where the majority of men marry 11 year olds and where sleeping with pre-pubescent girls is encouraged? Isn’t that pedophilia (the definition normies have is a bit loose and has nothing to do with pedophilia. I’m working with the actual definition of pedophilia here which is the attraction to pre-pubescent kids). How does a normalfag explain this obvious contradiction. I mean, as a normie, you don’t want to be called a racist for saying that what these people do is immoral, right? That’s basically social suicide. Well, they don’t. They keep living in denial. So, by normie logic, saying that certain aspects of foreign cultures ( which might include pedophilia) is utterly racist and xenophobic — i.e. criticising pedos is racist and xenophobic . To me that’s hypocritical. Yet, you have many normies calling us racist. But by their logic, we’re in the same category as them. To be frank, I’m not surprised. Those are the same people who use #KillAllMen on Twitter but freak out when a man that belongs to a (((marginalised))) group gets shot. Those are the same people who can’t shut up about “muh patriarchy” while ignoring the biological and social differences between men and women.
Moreover, normies are not able to justify why pedophilia is morally wrong. Their entire view on morality is utterly subjective (and so is mine for that matter, but I don’t calming to be morally superior to others). By saying pedophilia is wrong since they have no objective moral basis, they’re merely offering their own opinion. Why should we go by their moral values? Who are they to say that Islamic values are wrong, or that the moral system of African tribes or the vikings is wrong?
Normie arguments are usually something along the lines of “because it traumatises the victim”. But why should we value the well-being of the victim? if they say “because that’s the things are” they are essentially getting an ought from an is, which, as you know, is philosophically problematic. In conclusion, the postmodernist “woke” ideology that most normies adhere to claims that all races/cultures are equal, but at the same time they call certain aspects of other cultures immoral, implying that these cultures are morally inferior, solely based on subjective moral values.
Thoughts?
Last edited:
